Truthmatters
Diamond Member
- May 10, 2007
- 80,182
- 2,272
- 1,283
- Banned
- #21
I heard they must be shaped in the form of Sara Palins hair. They also have to hold hands in the urinals.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And tap their feet to announce their presence.I heard they must be shaped in the form of Sara Palins hair. They also have to hold hands in the urinals.
it would require that healthcare be rationed for seniors. In other words -it would require that doctors base their decision to treat someone - on their age.
Link?
I think you are full of shit but here's your chance to prove otherwise.
Um, thanks? That portion was about Information Technology. Could you give me a phrase to search for?Link?it would require that healthcare be rationed for seniors. In other words -it would require that doctors base their decision to treat someone - on their age.
I think you are full of shit but here's your chance to prove otherwise.
here, knock yourself out. the pertinent info is contained between roughly PP440 and 540.
http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=111_cong_bills&docid=f:h1eh.txt.pdf
Um, thanks? That portion was about Information Technology. Could you give me a phrase to search for?Link?
I think you are full of shit but here's your chance to prove otherwise.
here, knock yourself out. the pertinent info is contained between roughly PP440 and 540.
http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=111_cong_bills&docid=f:h1eh.txt.pdf
I did read it.Um, thanks? That portion was about Information Technology. Could you give me a phrase to search for?here, knock yourself out. the pertinent info is contained between roughly PP440 and 540.
http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=111_cong_bills&docid=f:h1eh.txt.pdf
no, read it or not. it's your choice, and it was primarily about health care and IT.
I did read it.Um, thanks? That portion was about Information Technology. Could you give me a phrase to search for?
no, read it or not. it's your choice, and it was primarily about health care and IT.
It has worked in the past and will work this time if its NOT watered down too much.
Dont you people ever read history?
Frazz, it's froth. Where are your points?
The start is simple revisionism, the sort of anti-Keynesian revisionism that started with Friedman and the Chicag School and which was adopted as orthodoxy in the 1970s and strengthened. The revisionism has got to the point now where some people are arguing that it was WWII not Keynesianism that saved capitalism. The paucity of that ideology can be seen if you look beyond the US, beyond the New Deal, to look at the policies of other countries that followed Keynes ideas and saved their economies.
Your views on health care are a simple re-hash of tired old arguments. I'll re-state my own views if we're re-hashing. Health care should not be run by private corporations on the basis of profit, health care should be at least single-payer funded and provided as a right to citizens and not a luxury.
Your assertion that "liberalism" (whatever that is) is a mental illness is just a studied insult and needs to be seen as such.
And your post is a simple collection of prejudices glued together and slapped into the forum in your usual wordy style where much is written but no real solid points are made.
It has worked in the past and will work this time if its NOT watered down too much.
Dont you people ever read history?
Scores of economists have said it will work.
Let's just stick with the good old tax cuts.
If passed as is in both houses of Congress, the Senate "stimulus bill" will affect every single person in the country because of the hidden provisions buried deep in the bill. This bill really isn't about stimulating the economy because scores of economists have repeatedly said this bill will not do that because government cannot spend the country out of a recession. Never has, never will. It was about something else all along. I'm sure Obama was hoping to get it passed before anyone read that far into the bill -and see it imposed on all Americans without their approval or even their knowledge. Until too late.
Remember the founders were the same people who thought the fact England was imposing taxes on Americans without their input and consent -was worth violent revolution.
Scores of economists have said it will work.
Let's just stick with the good old tax cuts.
No way! You mean people can say any crazy shit they want and expect us to believe it?I see you don't know either.
If you come up with an original thought , opinion or observation there probably won't be anything on the net to link it to.