Steve Klein & 'Innocence Of Muslims': Film Promoter Remains Outspoken On Islam

Lakhota

Diamond Member
Jul 14, 2011
159,630
75,968
2,330
Native America
s-STEVE-KLEIN-INNOCENCE-OF-MUSLIMS-large.jpg

Steve Klein, Christian activist.

By GILLIAN FLACCUS

HEMET, Calif. -- The public face for the anti-Muslim film inflaming the Middle East is not the filmmaker, but an insurance agent and Vietnam War veteran whose unabashed and outspoken hatred of radical Muslims has drawn the attention of civil libertarians, who say he's a hate monger.

With the Coptic Christian filmmaker Nakoula Basseley Nakoula in hiding, film promoter Steve Klein has taken center stage in the unfolding international drama. He's given a stream of interviews about the film and the man he says he knew only as Sam Bacile, and is using the attention to talk about his own political views.

The Southern Poverty Law Center says they have been tracking Klein for several years and have labeled two of the organizations he is affiliated with as hate groups.

Klein founded Courageous Christians United, which conducts protests outside abortion clinics, Mormon temples and mosques, and started Concerned Citizens for the First Amendment, which preaches against Muslims and publishes volumes of anti-Muslim propaganda that Klein distributes. He also has helped train paramilitary militias at the church of Kaweah near Three Rivers, about an hour southeast of Fresno, to prepare for what they believe is a coming holy war with Muslim sleeper cells, according to the law center.

"It's extreme, ugly, violent rhetoric and the fact that he's involved in that weapons training at that church, when you combine things like weapons training with hatred of a people, that's very concerning to us. Those are the kind of things that lead to hate crimes," said Heidi Beirich, director of the center's Intelligence Project.

More: Steve Klein & 'Innocence Of Muslims': Film Promoter Remains Outspoken On Islam
 
Hillary Clinton distances US government from anti-Islam film - video

US secretary of state, Hillary Clinton, says the US government had nothing to do with a film about the Prophet Mohammad that has triggered anti-American protests in Egypt, Yemen and other Muslim countries. Speaking with senior Moroccan officials in Washington, she says 'We absolutely reject its content and message'.

Hillary Clinton distances US government from anti-Islam film - video | World news | guardian.co.uk
 
Huh, what?

Senior officials are increasingly convinced, however, that the ferocious nature of the Benghazi attack, in which rocket-propelled grenades were used, indicated it was not the result of spontaneous anger due to the video, called Innocence of Muslims. Patrick Kennedy, Under-Secretary at the State Department, said he was convinced the assault was planned due to its extensive nature and the proliferation of weapons.

There is growing belief that the attack was in revenge for the killing in a drone strike in Pakistan of Mohammed Hassan Qaed, an al-Qa'ida operative who was, as his nom-de-guerre Abu Yahya al-Libi suggests, from Libya, and timed for the anniversary of the 11 September attacks.
 
Oh, for the love of God, does anyone get this outraged when radical Muslims threaten all the time to kill all infidels?

I don't give a shit if some extremists are upset over a damn film. After what the did on 9/11, the last thing I'm worried about is their feelings. If other Muslims are really peaceful, they will let it go the same way other religions do when they are constantly bashed.
 
PolitiFact: Did the U.S. embassy in Cairo make an apology?

By Louis Jacobson

What three apology experts say:

To explore whether the statement represented an apology, we sent it to the four experts we interviewed for our previous fact-check on Romney's claim about Obama's apology tour. Here are the comments of the three who responded:

•John Murphy, a communications professor at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign who studies presidential rhetoric and political language, said Romney was wrong to label it an apology.

"First, the statement does not use the word ‘apology’ or ‘apologize’ and does not use any synonym for that word. There is no statement here that says, ‘We are sorry.’

"Second, the grammar of the statement condemns the actions of a third party. An apology, to be pedantic, is when the first party says to the second party, ‘I have offended you and I am sorry.’ This statement condemns a third party -- misguided individuals -- that does not officially represent the United States. The term ‘individuals’ dissociates them from the U.S. Therefore, it's impossible to say that this is an apology from the U.S. to anyone.

"Third, the statement does not apologize for the right of free speech; it affirms it. It condemns those who abuse the right of free speech, but it claims that this is a universal right, as is religious toleration. So, the statement does not like what the misguided individuals said and did, but recognizes they have a right to do it."

"It's a condemnation," Murphy said, "not an apology."

• Lauren Bloom, an attorney and business consultant who wrote The Art of the Apology, said that Romney is "once again allowing his emotional allergy to apology to interfere with his judgment."

Bloom said that "if there's anything more central to American values than respecting each individual's right to worship as he or she pleases, I'd be hard-pressed to say what it might be. The statement that ‘respect for religious beliefs is a cornerstone of American democracy’ not only is true, but is as clear an expression of one of our most cherished values as I can imagine."

She said the embassy statement is "not an apology -- quite the contrary, it's a confirmation that the American people recognize the right to worship freely and will not accept religious bullying in the name of free speech. To say that someone who deliberately insults others in the name of religion has acted wrongly isn't an apology -- it's simply a recognition that those insults go too far."

• Rhoda E. Howard-Hassmann, a professor who studies international human rights and maintains the website Political Apologies and Reparations, a database of documents on apologies, said the statement is "not an apology."

Rather, she said, "it is a condemnation of ‘abuse’ of the universal value of free speech. A condemnation is not an apology. … The Embassy statement also reaffirms two American values: the American value of respect for religious beliefs and the American value of democracy."

More: PolitiFact: Did the U.S. embassy in Cairo make an apology?
 
Funny how you on the left defend peoples that have done nothing to advance human freedoms or rights. Truly, all you bastards would be bowing to a human god if it wasn't for the white man. Keep on hating!

Islam=force people to shut up and be silent
Blacks=No, I'd still be bowing to the chief of my tribe.



Yet, it's us whites that are the enemy of the left. O'boy, they will scream about how you're taking their freedom of speech away when they're protesting us, but then they will defend the very people that have no drive of it. People that would take it away from them.

Islam would take all of our freedom of speech away. Don't you understand this? I don't think so.
 
Last edited:
so what does the troll think should be done, HANG the filmaker, take away our rights to Freedom of Speech?

man oh man, pass the barf bag for this thread
 
TOTAL THREAD FAIL!!​

Another POLITICALLY CORRECT liberal MORON kissing VIOLENT, BLOODY, MURDERING MUSLIM ASS.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top