St. Louis Cop KILLS Cop: St. Louis City Attorney Involved In COVER-UP

caddo kid

Gold Member
Aug 15, 2018
8,701
710
280
Police officer's death resulted from 'Russian roulette'-style game, authorities say; fellow officer charged

Off duty St. Louis police officer Katlyn Alix was murdered by another St. Louis police officer, Nathaniel Hendren, that was on duty, at Hendren's home.

"Hendren and his partner were working a late shift Wednesday, but traveled to his house two miles away from the southeastern border of the district of their assigned patrol area, the paper reported. They were required to remain in their assigned district at all times, the report said."

So, Hendren & his partner went to Hendren's home, outside of the patrol district, which is a policy violation, then off duty officer Katlyn Alix (deceased) who was married, meet Hendren & his partner at Hendren's home at 1 AM.

So, why would an off duty female officer, who is married, meet Hendren & Hendren's partner at Hendren's home at 1 AM?

St. Louis City Attorney Kim Gardner is involved in a cover-up concerning this crime, IMO.

Also, the charge of involuntary manslaughter is a fvcking joke.
 
St. Louis City Attorney Kim Gardner is involved in a cover-up concerning this crime, IMO.

Also, the charge of involuntary manslaughter is a fvcking joke.

How do you figure anything is being "covered up"? Does the city attorney even know the principals in this case?

Involuntary Manslaughter is the charge that the prosecutors feel they can prove now, they are investigating. Right now, its an accident caused by negligence, it hasn't been proved to be an intentional homicide yet. Maybe let's see what the investigation shows? It is possible that the folks involved in this incident were just assholes and didn't harbor any ill will toward each other at all.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #6
St. Louis City Attorney Kim Gardner is involved in a cover-up concerning this crime, IMO.

Also, the charge of involuntary manslaughter is a fvcking joke.

How do you figure anything is being "covered up"? Does the city attorney even know the principals in this case?

Involuntary Manslaughter is the charge that the prosecutors feel they can prove now, they are investigating. Right now, its an accident caused by negligence, it hasn't been proved to be an intentional homicide yet. Maybe let's see what the investigation shows? It is possible that the folks involved in this incident were just assholes and didn't harbor any ill will toward each other at all.


shit loads of people hitting up the St. Louis City Attorney TWITTER account saying it's bullshit.

Circuit Attorney on Twitter

I guess you are in the minority with your opinion.
 
St. Louis City Attorney Kim Gardner is involved in a cover-up concerning this crime, IMO.

Also, the charge of involuntary manslaughter is a fvcking joke.

How do you figure anything is being "covered up"? Does the city attorney even know the principals in this case?

Involuntary Manslaughter is the charge that the prosecutors feel they can prove now, they are investigating. Right now, its an accident caused by negligence, it hasn't been proved to be an intentional homicide yet. Maybe let's see what the investigation shows? It is possible that the folks involved in this incident were just assholes and didn't harbor any ill will toward each other at all.


shit loads of people hitting up the St. Louis City Attorney TWITTER account saying it's bullshit.

Circuit Attorney on Twitter

I guess you are in the minority with your opinion.


My opinion is to wait for an investigation. The fact that hundreds of people with twitter accounts want to immediate move to execution for the accused here, even though all the facts aren't known, doesn't prove their uninformed opinions are right
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #8
St. Louis City Attorney Kim Gardner is involved in a cover-up concerning this crime, IMO.

Also, the charge of involuntary manslaughter is a fvcking joke.

How do you figure anything is being "covered up"? Does the city attorney even know the principals in this case?

Involuntary Manslaughter is the charge that the prosecutors feel they can prove now, they are investigating. Right now, its an accident caused by negligence, it hasn't been proved to be an intentional homicide yet. Maybe let's see what the investigation shows? It is possible that the folks involved in this incident were just assholes and didn't harbor any ill will toward each other at all.


shit loads of people hitting up the St. Louis City Attorney TWITTER account saying it's bullshit.

Circuit Attorney on Twitter

I guess you are in the minority with your opinion.


My opinion is to wait for an investigation. The fact that hundreds of people with twitter accounts want to immediate move to execution for the accused here, even though all the facts aren't known, doesn't prove their uninformed opinions are right

I didn't read a single Tweet on there that called for any "execution" but it's pretty obvious that the greater majority of Tweets signify a complete disbelief in the 'official' story, and see the cover-up for what is its.

Again; your opinion of the crime is certainly in a minority.
 

Forum List

Back
Top