This could work out if Republicans have any balls at all:
The goal is to assign a sponsor to each kid rather than let them dive into the public trough. It goes without saying that sponsors must have respectable incomes. The middle class, and the middle-class, plus the very well-off can provide more than enough candidates.
The first thing to do is gather up the names of everybody who is responsible for open-borders. Every member of the Chamber of Commerce and lobbyists top the list. Next come members of Congress and everybody in the current Administration.
Of course, on-camera media people make the list. Brit Hume tops that list. Let me say that I used to think Hume was okay, but hes lost a lot of points lately. His take on the kids in this video is more than enough to send him down to the minors no pun intended:
How dumb do you have to be to believe that those kids just packed up and walked across Mexico?
Incidentally, the drugs and violence motive Hume cited has been debunked as the primary cause.
Parenthetically, if drugs and violence is reason for a mass migration, black kids in some of our inner-cities would have been outta here a long time ago. In fact, the government obviously cannot stop the drugs and violence; so it would be an act of compassionate to ship American kids to a country where there are no drug and violence problems.
All of the people Ive identified so far cannot cover the number of kids in the sponsor program. The largest number of sponsors will come from the touchy-feely legions who love everything Democrats do.
Heres what Im suggesting:
1. Sponsors will only be chosen from the touchy-feely crowd with a proven record of advocating coerced charity.
2. Give kids to everybody on the list according to income just like the graduated tax on income. Middle class incomes get one kid; $150,000 up to a million get two kids. Millionaires get six. Billionaires get a dozen.
3. Make it mandatory that sponsors house, feed, cloth, educate, etc. out of their own pockets no tax deductions for their compassion.
4. If a sponsor fails to comply without disavowing a love of coerced charity confiscate everything they own to pay for the kids.
My sponsor program can work because the largest obstacle to success has been overcome; i.e., liberals cannot object to government force since force is the foundation of their compassion so long as somebody else is paying for it. This time around make them pay for it.
Serendipitously, sponsors will help educate kids in poor countries. Just ship them back to where they came from after their sponsors pay to raise and educate them here. If Brit Hume is right about them being assets their home countries need them more than does America.
Heres the beautiful part. Even if the number of baby-border-jumpers goes to a million in the next few years, there are more than enough touchy-feely douche bags in this country to pick up the tab.
The goal is to assign a sponsor to each kid rather than let them dive into the public trough. It goes without saying that sponsors must have respectable incomes. The middle class, and the middle-class, plus the very well-off can provide more than enough candidates.
The first thing to do is gather up the names of everybody who is responsible for open-borders. Every member of the Chamber of Commerce and lobbyists top the list. Next come members of Congress and everybody in the current Administration.
Of course, on-camera media people make the list. Brit Hume tops that list. Let me say that I used to think Hume was okay, but hes lost a lot of points lately. His take on the kids in this video is more than enough to send him down to the minors no pun intended:
How dumb do you have to be to believe that those kids just packed up and walked across Mexico?
Incidentally, the drugs and violence motive Hume cited has been debunked as the primary cause.
Parenthetically, if drugs and violence is reason for a mass migration, black kids in some of our inner-cities would have been outta here a long time ago. In fact, the government obviously cannot stop the drugs and violence; so it would be an act of compassionate to ship American kids to a country where there are no drug and violence problems.
All of the people Ive identified so far cannot cover the number of kids in the sponsor program. The largest number of sponsors will come from the touchy-feely legions who love everything Democrats do.
Heres what Im suggesting:
1. Sponsors will only be chosen from the touchy-feely crowd with a proven record of advocating coerced charity.
2. Give kids to everybody on the list according to income just like the graduated tax on income. Middle class incomes get one kid; $150,000 up to a million get two kids. Millionaires get six. Billionaires get a dozen.
3. Make it mandatory that sponsors house, feed, cloth, educate, etc. out of their own pockets no tax deductions for their compassion.
4. If a sponsor fails to comply without disavowing a love of coerced charity confiscate everything they own to pay for the kids.
My sponsor program can work because the largest obstacle to success has been overcome; i.e., liberals cannot object to government force since force is the foundation of their compassion so long as somebody else is paying for it. This time around make them pay for it.
Serendipitously, sponsors will help educate kids in poor countries. Just ship them back to where they came from after their sponsors pay to raise and educate them here. If Brit Hume is right about them being assets their home countries need them more than does America.
Heres the beautiful part. Even if the number of baby-border-jumpers goes to a million in the next few years, there are more than enough touchy-feely douche bags in this country to pick up the tab.
