daveman
Diamond Member
They mean well...and that's all that matters.American Liberals want to rule like Nazis....yeah, why should anyone worry about that?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They mean well...and that's all that matters.American Liberals want to rule like Nazis....yeah, why should anyone worry about that?
More lies from a pathological liar. Not at all surprising.I have done none of that, you lying sack of shit. I proved the OP's passionate defense of Nazism is bullshit.
Yup, every time you cry about legitimate law making and citizens having to open laws we have here you open up with "nazi" and "socialist" and "boot licking" and so forth and so on.
Logic? You know nothing of logic.I have done none of that, you lying sack of shit. I proved the OP's passionate defense of Nazism is bullshit.
Where is the OP defending Nazis?
That's a pretty major leap of logic without a kernel of evidence.
I do!Sorry, Gun Nuts: Hitler Actually Relaxed Most Gun Laws
Here's the deal, oh, sweet, stupid gun nuts: Have a history lesson. Gun control laws had nothing to do with the rise of the Nazis or the Holocaust. In fact, they were initially part of the Treaty of Versailles at the end of World War I, punishing Germany by eliminating private ownership of guns. In the Weimar Republic, new laws liberalized gun ownership, allowing hunting rifles and more. The other gun control laws in Germany post-WWI were specifically put in to prevent armed takeover of the government by groups like the Nazi Party, which did not, in fact, stage a coup, but used electoral power to solidify its hold on the government (along with the Gestapo and the repression of demonized Communist groups). In fact, Hitler and the Third Reich opened up gun ownership even more, even if they did ban all Jews from owning guns. Yeah, the 1938 law said "a hunting license entitles the holder to carry firearms and handguns." That was new. It also lowered the age of gun ownership from 20 to 18 and changed one-year permits to three-year.
Oh, by the way, the law also took away any "stabbing weapons" from Jews. And if the Jews had been more strongly armed and attacked the government, all that would have happened is that even more people would have turned on them because the propaganda that said that evil Jews wanted to enslave the country would have appeared to be proven true. No, the Holocaust wouldn't have been worse. But it would still have happened. (This leaves out the enormous amount of armed Jewish resistance against the Nazis.)
The Rude Pundit understands that there's a lot of people out there who like to fellate their guns and call it love. He understands that there's so many who are jonesing for that first rampaging black man to come bursting in during a race riot so they can finally find out what really happens when Bushmaster fire hits human flesh. He understands that there's a whole lot of people invested in chasing the phantoms of resistance, as if they could actually survive if the government turns on us.
If you think you need to be armed with assault weapons because you might have to fight a government that wants to take your assault weapons away through laws passed by a legally-elected body, you are a traitor and kind of a dick. And if that's the best you've got for your argument on why you need to have military style weapons, then you, dear, dumb friend, are believing a whole heaping shovelful of lies.
Come, fantasize for a moment about something other than Jesus with a strap-on shaped like a Ruger reaming your asshole. Fantasize that many non-Jewish Germans opposed Hitler and wanted to rise up against him. You know what would have happened? The enormous Nazi army would have massacred them. The Third Reich existed because the German people wanted it to exist. Give it up.
Fantasize now that the American government wants you dead. Fantasize about the sound of that drone carrying missiles. It's a nearly silent whoosh. You hear it? You think your semi-automatic whatever could stop it? Now imagine being turned into blood vapor.
Really, though, it's never gonna happen. And neither is the race war. And chances are pretty damn good that you're never gonna get to point a gun at anyone other than a family member or yourself.
But, if nothing else, give up the Nazi analogy. Considering all the Nazi shit that shows up at gun shows in an approving way, you just look like hypocritical yahoos attempting to be smart, and that's just fuckin' pathetic.
You don't see anything wrong with playing the Hitler card?
I guess you missed the legally-elected body part.If you think you need to be armed with assault weapons because you might have to fight a government that wants to take your assault weapons away through laws passed by a legally-elected body, you are a traitor and kind of a dick
When I see this in bold and someone truly believing in what they are typing, I'm almost speechless. What in the heck???? Where in the hell did we go wrong to even have one US Citizen state and believe in what he just stated above?
.
I guess you missed the legally-elected body part.It is the people who would pass such laws and lemmings like yourself who support government authoritarianism and oppression who are the traitors and far worse than a dick. Are you really this much of a coward?
Perhaps you would be more comfortable living in Cuba.
Why do you assume I missed it. It's irrelevant. Being legally elected has nothing to do with the ability to be treasonous. I guess you missed out on the education part.
I've never used the Nazi's gun laws argument, you retard.I guess he doesn't dave.
More likely, he recognizes that he has a losing argument.
Nevertheless, you're just going to have to accept that not everyone joins you in mindless, slavish worship of your little tin god.
He's a retard, still butthurt from Obama's landslide victory.daveman compares our democratic Rule of Law country to Nazi Germany, compares our elected officials to Nazis. That is pure crazy evil on daveman's part. He sounds as wack as bripat.
I have done none of that, you lying sack of shit. I proved the OP's passionate defense of Nazism is bullshit.
Where is the OP defending Nazis?
That's a pretty major leap of logic without a kernel of evidence.
Wingnuts think that paying for the society that lets you prosper is a punishment.Paying a tax.And face punishment by the government.
That's freedom to you, huh, bootlicker?
What punishment?
Dumbass.
ASK 6 MILLION GERMAN JEWS HOW RELAXED HITLERS GUN CONTROL LAWS WERE.
No wait you can't he murdered them.
There is one thing I've learned in reading the threads on this site: many of the people who are pro-guns are not really interested in the 2nd Amendment, they are salivating to kill someone.....to be judge, jury and executioner....to kill someone they don't like....to just experience the thrill and power of killing someone, anyone...they'll manufacture any reason they think that will allow them to get away with it.
There is one thing I've learned in reading the threads on this site: many of the people who are pro-guns are not really interested in the 2nd Amendment, they are salivating to kill someone.....to be judge, jury and executioner....to kill someone they don't like....to just experience the thrill and power of killing someone, anyone...they'll manufacture any reason they think that will allow them to get away with it.
No, that's just another assumption. Most people want to keep the means to protect their most fundamental rights. I don't have life insurance because I want to die, and I DO NOT own a gun because I want to kill... You people really do have a narrow mind It's really less about guns and more about understanding the darker side of human nature.