Soros Promotes UN Control Over Gun Ownership...

[GuyPinestra]

Clearly the treaty covers international arms trading. Of course the NRA is opposed as we are the biggest arms dealer in the world by far and will try and scare the bejesus out of some folks.....

You must've skimmed over this part...

In order to avoid being labeled a “human rights abuser,” the United States (along with all member states) is ordered by the UN to comply with the ATT. To compel this compliance, the ATT empowers the UN to force Congress to:

• Enact internationally agreed licensing requirements for Americans

• Confiscate and destroy unauthorized firearms of Americans while allowing the U.S. government to keep theirs

• Ban the trade, sale, and private ownership of semi-automatic guns

• Create and mandate an international registry to organize an encompassing gun confiscation in America

 

[Charles_Main]

George Soros is financing the fight to give the United Nations control of your guns.

Through his Media Matters organization, Soros is dumping pro-UN gun control propaganda into the mainstream media to coincide with the United Nations Conference on the Arms Trade Treaty being held in New York July 2–27.

In a blog post published on July 3, Timothy Johnson of Media Matters describes the notion that the United Nations would ever try to take away the right of Americans to keep and bear arms “laughable.”

Johnson goes on to promote the passage of the UN’s Arms Trade Treaty (ATT) as a means of “curtailing the illicit arms trade” and thus cracking down on those who use these weapons to deny others their “human rights.”

The blog post assures citizens concerned about the potential eradication of the rights guaranteed in the Second Amendment to the Constitution that they have nothing to fear from the UN’s gun control treaty.

Top officials from the United Nations, the United States, and other high profile supporters have repeatedly and clearly said that the treaty does not aim to restrict anyone’s “freedom to own” a gun. Indeed, the UN General Assembly’s resolution on the treaty makes clear that countries will “exclusively” maintain the right within their borders to “regulate internal transfers of arms and national ownership, including through national constitutional protections on private ownerships.”

Constitutionalists will instantly notice a couple of red flags raised by Media Matters’ word choice...

Read More:
» Soros Promotes UN Control Over Gun Ownership Alex Jones' Infowars: There's a war on for your mind!

The Day I answer to the UN about anything is the Day I become a "rebel"

Just go ahead and send some thug to take my guns, they will get them alright. Bullets first.

 

[tinydancer]

Clearly the treaty covers international arms trading. Of course the NRA is opposed as we are the biggest arms dealer in the world by far and will try and scare the bejesus out of some folks.....

The United Nations has been hell bent for leather over decades to attempt some form of international small arms gun control that would legally bind individual nations to follow their laws.

It's not bullshit. It's not a conspiracy. No one has dreamed this up. They've been straight up front about this for decades.

The UN has been relentlessly pursuing this agenda. It's well known and well broadcast. And not just on conspiracy websites.

"In the text of the ATT, the United Nations specifically calls for the passage of a legally binding instrument that will impose international standards for the ownership, trade, and transfer of weapons.

In another section the ATT includes “controls on a comprehensive list of weaponry, including small arms and light weapons.” Predictably, all these controls are couched comfortably in talk of “human rights” and ending senseless killings by rogue regimes.

In order to avoid being labeled a “human rights abuser,” the United States (along with all member states) is ordered by the UN to comply with the ATT. To compel this compliance, the ATT empowers the UN to force Congress to:

• Enact internationally agreed licensing requirements for Americans

• Confiscate and destroy unauthorized firearms of Americans while allowing the U.S. government to keep theirs

• Ban the trade, sale, and private ownership of semi-automatic guns

• Create and mandate an international registry to organize an encompassing gun confiscation in America"

Soros Promotes UN Control Over Gun Ownership

The ATT would regulate the international trade in conventional weapons and not effect the laws inside the USA. If you have a copy of the text of this proposed treaty please put up a link.

Go to this link that I first put up and you will be able to link to the pdf with the text.

Soros Promotes UN Control Over Gun Ownership

 

[tinydancer]

For anyone who is interested, Heritage (the Foundry) has boots on the ground at this meeting. Here's a bit of the summary of Week 1 with a link.

The gentleman who is observing all of this is not a conspiracy theorist. He is a PHD and well regarded.

"There are many contentious issues left to be resolved at the conference. Should the treaty—please, no—include ammunition, technology, and parts and components?

Should it require so-called capacity building assistance (i.e., lots of easily wasted foreign aid that would dangerously give the U.N. a permanent funding source) from the richer signatories?

Should the treaty make it crystal clear—please, yes—that it really does not apply to anything that goes on inside the U.S.?


The real division at the conference is fourfold. There are (1) nations (mostly in Europe) that do not for a moment intend to stop selling arms or are trying to beat the Americans out of contracts but also want an ATT at least in part because they naively hope to curb a few state-led human rights abuses;

(2) nations (mostly totalitarian or autocratic) that don’t want an ATT at all unless it disarms their opponents, enshrines their right to buy, and does not limit their access to technology;

(3) nations (mostly African) that want capacity-building assistance and whose motto might as well be “show me the money”; and

(4) Russia and China, which don’t really want an ATT but don’t really want to stop it openly either. The U.S. doesn’t fall into any of these camps, which is why it spoke for the Permanent Members.

My own view is that the conference is likely to produce a treaty. But it’s quite clear that all the treaties in the world cannot come close to making up for the insincerity, the incapacity, and a few actually honest differences of opinion on display daily at the United Nations."

A First-Week Roundup from the U.N.'s Arms Trade Treaty Conference

 

[JDzBrain]

Just thought I'd point out to you JACKWAGONS who wander through the world with rose tinted glasses that about HALF of all laws and regulations in this country are to STOP CONSPIRACIES!!!

THOUSANDS of laws and regulations to stop governments, nations, states, businesses or groups of individuals from doing harm or exploiting individuals or groups of individuals. Ever hear of anti-trust laws? Even our damn Constitution addresses conspiracy in a few places.

Why do you think that dumb ass amendment that's led to anchor babies was written? It was because of a CONSPIRACY by several states to circumvent the law and deport blacks back to Africa after the Civil War.

So to claim that the so called "conspiracy nuts' are kooks means YOU are the ones who refuse to see!

I believe Soros to be an evil son of a bitch who is bent on and conspiring with others, both inside and outside the democrat party, to destroy this country for personal gain. Not only WILL he do it...he has done it before to other countries. Ever hear of "The man who broke the Bank of England?" How about his ties to the Malaysian economic and government collapse? And on and on and on. LOOK IT UP!!!

 

[paulitician]

Just thought I'd point out to you JACKWAGONS who wander through the world with rose tinted glasses that about HALF of all laws and regulations in this country are to STOP CONSPIRACIES!!!

THOUSANDS of laws and regulations to stop governments, nations, states, businesses or groups of individuals from doing harm or exploiting individuals or groups of individuals. Ever hear of anti-trust laws? Even our damn Constitution addresses conspiracy in a few places.

Why do you think that dumb ass amendment that's led to anchor babies was written? It was because of a CONSPIRACY by several states to circumvent the law and deport blacks back to Africa after the Civil War.

So to claim that the so called "conspiracy nuts' are kooks means YOU are the ones who refuse to see!

I believe Soros to be an evil son of a bitch who is bent on and conspiring with others, both inside and outside the democrat party, to destroy this country for personal gain. Not only WILL he do it...he has done it before to other countries. Ever hear of "The man who broke the Bank of England?" How about his ties to the Malaysian economic and government collapse? And on and on and on. LOOK IT UP!!!

He's a fellow Socialist/Progressive, and he owns the Democratic Party. So the Bots aren't interested in facts. It is sad but it is what it is.

 

[AmericanFirst]

George Soros is financing the fight to give the United Nations control of your guns.

Through his Media Matters organization, Soros is dumping pro-UN gun control propaganda into the mainstream media to coincide with the United Nations Conference on the Arms Trade Treaty being held in New York July 2–27.

In a blog post published on July 3, Timothy Johnson of Media Matters describes the notion that the United Nations would ever try to take away the right of Americans to keep and bear arms “laughable.”

Johnson goes on to promote the passage of the UN’s Arms Trade Treaty (ATT) as a means of “curtailing the illicit arms trade” and thus cracking down on those who use these weapons to deny others their “human rights.”

The blog post assures citizens concerned about the potential eradication of the rights guaranteed in the Second Amendment to the Constitution that they have nothing to fear from the UN’s gun control treaty.

Top officials from the United Nations, the United States, and other high profile supporters have repeatedly and clearly said that the treaty does not aim to restrict anyone’s “freedom to own” a gun. Indeed, the UN General Assembly’s resolution on the treaty makes clear that countries will “exclusively” maintain the right within their borders to “regulate internal transfers of arms and national ownership, including through national constitutional protections on private ownerships.”

Constitutionalists will instantly notice a couple of red flags raised by Media Matters’ word choice...

Read More:
» Soros Promotes UN Control Over Gun Ownership Alex Jones' Infowars: There's a war on for your mind!

Sorors is a anti-American socialist idiot. If anyone defends him they are also. Idiots.

 

[TakeAStepBack]

It's typical globalist power grabbing. The thing is it wont work. BNot here. First, guns are made by people, by gun smiths. People want fire arms for an assortment of reasons (most are lawful) and when push comes to shove, just like with prohibition or any other attempt to control the markets, a black market will spring up.

I think the black market is great because it chokes off the state in market sectors. (unless the state deliberately creates the black market to keep the profits high...like in the drug war)

The point. This isn't going to work even if the LOLberals sign sucha treaty. It will be a "come take my guns" type thing in the US.

 

[AmericanFirst]

George Soros is financing the fight to give the United Nations control of your guns.

Through his Media Matters organization, Soros is dumping pro-UN gun control propaganda into the mainstream media to coincide with the United Nations Conference on the Arms Trade Treaty being held in New York July 2–27.

In a blog post published on July 3, Timothy Johnson of Media Matters describes the notion that the United Nations would ever try to take away the right of Americans to keep and bear arms “laughable.”

Johnson goes on to promote the passage of the UN’s Arms Trade Treaty (ATT) as a means of “curtailing the illicit arms trade” and thus cracking down on those who use these weapons to deny others their “human rights.”

The blog post assures citizens concerned about the potential eradication of the rights guaranteed in the Second Amendment to the Constitution that they have nothing to fear from the UN’s gun control treaty.

Top officials from the United Nations, the United States, and other high profile supporters have repeatedly and clearly said that the treaty does not aim to restrict anyone’s “freedom to own” a gun. Indeed, the UN General Assembly’s resolution on the treaty makes clear that countries will “exclusively” maintain the right within their borders to “regulate internal transfers of arms and national ownership, including through national constitutional protections on private ownerships.”

Constitutionalists will instantly notice a couple of red flags raised by Media Matters’ word choice...

Read More:
» Soros Promotes UN Control Over Gun Ownership Alex Jones' Infowars: There's a war on for your mind!

Sorors is a anti-American socialist idiot. If anyone defends him they are also. Idiots.

I notice few idiots defending the idiot soros. Intelligence reigns again.

 

[BlindBoo]

The United Nations has been hell bent for leather over decades to attempt some form of international small arms gun control that would legally bind individual nations to follow their laws.

It's not bullshit. It's not a conspiracy. No one has dreamed this up. They've been straight up front about this for decades.

The UN has been relentlessly pursuing this agenda. It's well known and well broadcast. And not just on conspiracy websites.

"In the text of the ATT, the United Nations specifically calls for the passage of a legally binding instrument that will impose international standards for the ownership, trade, and transfer of weapons.

In another section the ATT includes “controls on a comprehensive list of weaponry, including small arms and light weapons.” Predictably, all these controls are couched comfortably in talk of “human rights” and ending senseless killings by rogue regimes.

In order to avoid being labeled a “human rights abuser,” the United States (along with all member states) is ordered by the UN to comply with the ATT. To compel this compliance, the ATT empowers the UN to force Congress to:

• Enact internationally agreed licensing requirements for Americans

• Confiscate and destroy unauthorized firearms of Americans while allowing the U.S. government to keep theirs

• Ban the trade, sale, and private ownership of semi-automatic guns

• Create and mandate an international registry to organize an encompassing gun confiscation in America"

Soros Promotes UN Control Over Gun Ownership

The ATT would regulate the international trade in conventional weapons and not effect the laws inside the USA. If you have a copy of the text of this proposed treaty please put up a link.

Ok slugger time is up, name one treaty, just one, passed by the UN that was never violated. I will make it easy, how about an embargo, can you name one that was not violated?

Funny how someone thinks for one minute that Russia, China, or the US, for that mater, will ever stop selling arms. Someone fell down the rabbit hole and has not found their way out.

First of all I never claimed their effort would be sucessfull did I? My claim is that they are not going to try and take guns away from US Citizens with this treaty.

 

[BlindBoo]

Clearly the treaty covers international arms trading. Of course the NRA is opposed as we are the biggest arms dealer in the world by far and will try and scare the bejesus out of some folks.....

You must've skimmed over this part...

In order to avoid being labeled a “human rights abuser,” the United States (along with all member states) is ordered by the UN to comply with the ATT. To compel this compliance, the ATT empowers the UN to force Congress to:

• Enact internationally agreed licensing requirements for Americans

• Confiscate and destroy unauthorized firearms of Americans while allowing the U.S. government to keep theirs

• Ban the trade, sale, and private ownership of semi-automatic guns

• Create and mandate an international registry to organize an encompassing gun confiscation in America

Nothing in the treaty about any of those.

This was from the 2010 proposed treaty.

"Acknowledging also the right of States to regulate internal transfers of arms
and national ownership, including through national constitutional protections on
private ownership, exclusively within their territory,...."

United Nations Official Document

Now if you have a link to a newer treaty, feel free to post it.

Furthermore Article 2 of the UN Charter.

7. Nothing contained in the present Charter shall authorize the United Nations to intervene in matters which are essentially within the domestic jurisdiction of any state or shall require the Members to submit such matters to settlement under the present Charter; ....

Charter of the United Nations: Chapter I: Purposes and Principles

 

[JDzBrain]

First of all I never claimed their effort would be sucessfull did I? My claim is that they are not going to try and take guns away from US Citizens with this treaty.

Son...they have tried to take and/or restrict the use of our guns using every means they can come up with. From suing the makers of ammunition, to using the EPA to restrict the use of lead in BULLETS...not just shot shells for water fowl...and more recently to selling assault weapons to Mexican drug cartels to be used in the murder of HUNDREDS of innocent Mexicans and at least 2 US officers in an effort to turn public sentiment against guns.

Progressive's ends justifies the means philosophy means they will use or do ANYTHING. And this is just one more part of a death by a thousand cuts strategy.

If anyone honestly believes that this is not just one more step along the road to a one world order that leads to the US and therefore it's citizens being subjugated to a global governance...they are naive in the extreme.

If they believe that the notion of a one world government is a good thing and are just providing cover fire by defending this UN STUPIDITY...then they need to move their ass to Europe and start earning Euros. Cause it is NEVER going to happen.

Too many people have given their lives for our freedom for the average American to EVER allow that to happen!

 

[Staidhup]

First of all I never claimed their effort would be sucessfull did I? My claim is that they are not going to try and take guns away from US Citizens with this treaty.

Son...they have tried to take and/or restrict the use of our guns using every means they can come up with. From suing the makers of ammunition, to using the EPA to restrict the use of lead in BULLETS...not just shot shells for water fowl...and more recently to selling assault weapons to Mexican drug cartels to be used in the murder of HUNDREDS of innocent Mexicans and at least 2 US officers in an effort to turn public sentiment against guns.

Progressive's ends justifies the means philosophy means they will use or do ANYTHING. And this is just one more part of a death by a thousand cuts strategy.

If anyone honestly believes that this is not just one more step along the road to a one world order that leads to the US and therefore it's citizens being subjugated to a global governance...they are naive in the extreme.



If they believe that the notion of a one world government is a good thing and are just providing cover fire by defending this UN STUPIDITY...then they need to move their ass to Europe and start earning Euros. Cause it is NEVER going to happen.

Too many people have given their lives for our freedom for the average American to EVER allow that to happen!

So, lets hope congress still has the backbone to tell them to shove it! Fuck these pussies, let them play their pathetic games elsewhere. Someone put a shock collar on and a rag in Hillary's mouth, her ideology has stepped off the edge of the cliff.

 

[Clementine]

George Soros is financing the fight to give the United Nations control of your guns.

Through his Media Matters organization, Soros is dumping pro-UN gun control propaganda into the mainstream media to coincide with the United Nations Conference on the Arms Trade Treaty being held in New York July 2–27.

In a blog post published on July 3, Timothy Johnson of Media Matters describes the notion that the United Nations would ever try to take away the right of Americans to keep and bear arms “laughable.”

Johnson goes on to promote the passage of the UN’s Arms Trade Treaty (ATT) as a means of “curtailing the illicit arms trade” and thus cracking down on those who use these weapons to deny others their “human rights.”

The blog post assures citizens concerned about the potential eradication of the rights guaranteed in the Second Amendment to the Constitution that they have nothing to fear from the UN’s gun control treaty.

Top officials from the United Nations, the United States, and other high profile supporters have repeatedly and clearly said that the treaty does not aim to restrict anyone’s “freedom to own” a gun. Indeed, the UN General Assembly’s resolution on the treaty makes clear that countries will “exclusively” maintain the right within their borders to “regulate internal transfers of arms and national ownership, including through national constitutional protections on private ownerships.”

Constitutionalists will instantly notice a couple of red flags raised by Media Matters’ word choice...

Read More:
» Soros Promotes UN Control Over Gun Ownership Alex Jones' Infowars: There's a war on for your mind!

Soros is a evil piece of shit who has too much control over this country because he's pulling the puppet's strings.

 

[Lakhota]

George Soros is financing the fight to give the United Nations control of your guns.

Through his Media Matters organization, Soros is dumping pro-UN gun control propaganda into the mainstream media to coincide with the United Nations Conference on the Arms Trade Treaty being held in New York July 2–27.

In a blog post published on July 3, Timothy Johnson of Media Matters describes the notion that the United Nations would ever try to take away the right of Americans to keep and bear arms “laughable.”

Johnson goes on to promote the passage of the UN’s Arms Trade Treaty (ATT) as a means of “curtailing the illicit arms trade” and thus cracking down on those who use these weapons to deny others their “human rights.”

The blog post assures citizens concerned about the potential eradication of the rights guaranteed in the Second Amendment to the Constitution that they have nothing to fear from the UN’s gun control treaty.

Top officials from the United Nations, the United States, and other high profile supporters have repeatedly and clearly said that the treaty does not aim to restrict anyone’s “freedom to own” a gun. Indeed, the UN General Assembly’s resolution on the treaty makes clear that countries will “exclusively” maintain the right within their borders to “regulate internal transfers of arms and national ownership, including through national constitutional protections on private ownerships.”

Constitutionalists will instantly notice a couple of red flags raised by Media Matters’ word choice...

Read More:
» Soros Promotes UN Control Over Gun Ownership Alex Jones' Infowars: There's a war on for your mind!

OMG, there is no end to Soros evil. The ole gun control boogeyman...

 

[Stephanie]

Well well, we told you so..

 

[freedombecki]

George Soros is financing the fight to give the United Nations control of your guns.

Through his Media Matters organization, Soros is dumping pro-UN gun control propaganda into the mainstream media to coincide with the United Nations Conference on the Arms Trade Treaty being held in New York July 2–27.

In a blog post published on July 3, Timothy Johnson of Media Matters describes the notion that the United Nations would ever try to take away the right of Americans to keep and bear arms “laughable.”

Johnson goes on to promote the passage of the UN’s Arms Trade Treaty (ATT) as a means of “curtailing the illicit arms trade” and thus cracking down on those who use these weapons to deny others their “human rights.”

The blog post assures citizens concerned about the potential eradication of the rights guaranteed in the Second Amendment to the Constitution that they have nothing to fear from the UN’s gun control treaty.

Top officials from the United Nations, the United States, and other high profile supporters have repeatedly and clearly said that the treaty does not aim to restrict anyone’s “freedom to own” a gun. Indeed, the UN General Assembly’s resolution on the treaty makes clear that countries will “exclusively” maintain the right within their borders to “regulate internal transfers of arms and national ownership, including through national constitutional protections on private ownerships.”

Constitutionalists will instantly notice a couple of red flags raised by Media Matters’ word choice...

Read More:
» Soros Promotes UN Control Over Gun Ownership Alex Jones' Infowars: There's a war on for your mind!

OMG, there is no end to Soros evil. The ole gun control boogeyman...

You really need to keep guns out of the hands of Eric Holder. He doesn't know what he's doing. Holder Justice Dept: Rule of Law at Risk

 

[BlindBoo]

First of all I never claimed their effort would be sucessfull did I? My claim is that they are not going to try and take guns away from US Citizens with this treaty.

Son...they have tried to take and/or restrict the use of our guns using every means they can come up with. From suing the makers of ammunition, to using the EPA to restrict the use of lead in BULLETS...not just shot shells for water fowl...and more recently to selling assault weapons to Mexican drug cartels to be used in the murder of HUNDREDS of innocent Mexicans and at least 2 US officers in an effort to turn public sentiment against guns.

Progressive's ends justifies the means philosophy means they will use or do ANYTHING. And this is just one more part of a death by a thousand cuts strategy.

If anyone honestly believes that this is not just one more step along the road to a one world order that leads to the US and therefore it's citizens being subjugated to a global governance...they are naive in the extreme.

If they believe that the notion of a one world government is a good thing and are just providing cover fire by defending this UN STUPIDITY...then they need to move their ass to Europe and start earning Euros. Cause it is NEVER going to happen.

Too many people have given their lives for our freedom for the average American to EVER allow that to happen!

Say Pops, I hear that President Obama is not a natutral born citizen too. The majority of the American public has never given a flying rodents butt about the consequenses of the fascist War on Drugs and the violence it has produced. Most of the casualties are Mexicans or foriegners so we don't hear about it much. As oppossed to the violence in America alcohol prohibition created. They certianly are not going to turn against their constitutional right to own a gun because of it.

The UN's mission is to stop the scourge or war ("to save succeeding generations from the scourge of war"). Regulating international weapon sales is hardly a move towards the dreaded One World Government.

Personally I don't think they will be successful by regulating it because, just like the Drug War, there will be a lucrative black market for weapons.

 

[Stephanie]

omg, the Un's mission is to stop the scourge of war..

this administration would sell us out in a heartbeat..but vote for them again people

 

[uscitizen]

Clearly the treaty covers international arms trading. Of course the NRA is opposed as we are the biggest arms dealer in the world by far and will try and scare the bejesus out of some folks.....

You must've skimmed over this part...

In order to avoid being labeled a “human rights abuser,” the United States (along with all member states) is ordered by the UN to comply with the ATT. To compel this compliance, the ATT empowers the UN to force Congress to:

• Enact internationally agreed licensing requirements for Americans

• Confiscate and destroy unauthorized firearms of Americans while allowing the U.S. government to keep theirs

• Ban the trade, sale, and private ownership of semi-automatic guns

• Create and mandate an international registry to organize an encompassing gun confiscation in America

All this relates to international sales of weapons.
Not internal ownership and purchases.