Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
This is all so simple. A wealthy organization donates to a political party. The political party starts to move in a direction that the donor does not like. The donor threatens to withhold donation. This is all that it amounts to.
If the Republicans start to advocate more restrictions on gun ownership, it might lose some support from the NRA. The same principal applies.
Anyway, the Democrats have a choice to make. Make concessions to Bush and possibly lose support from move.on and Soros / or stand firm and continue to receive support from move.on and Soros.
That is all that there is to it.
Buying government is cool?
ANTI-W. $OROS: I QUIT POLITICS
By MAGGIE HABERMAN
September 29, 2006 -- Billionaire liberal financier George Soros, who spent millions of his fortune trying to oust President Bush in 2004, yesterday said he hopes to stay out of politics from now on.
"In the future, I'd very much like to get disengaged from politics," Soros said at a Council on Foreign Relations meeting on the Upper East Side. "I'm interested in policy and not in politics."
soros dropped out of the picture....move on represents PEOPLE, not a corporation... it is good to HEAR voices of the people, no?
soros dropped out of the picture....move on represents PEOPLE, not a corporation... it is good to HEAR voices of the people, no?
soros dropped out of the picture....move on represents PEOPLE, not a corporation... it is good to HEAR voices of the people, no?
Got a link?
lol j/k u! not about the halliburton...who KNOWS what's up with that...but kidding about him joining your side of the aisle!
The link to what I posted above:
http://usmessageboard.com/newreply.php?do=newreply&p=559853
The google link that has other sources:
http://aolsearch.aol.com/aol/search...ff03&invocationType=keyword_rollover&ie=UTF-8
Soros just spent a bundle and bought 1% of Halliburton a couple of months ago too.... so maybe he has just gone whackos and is burnt out or maybe he is joining your side?
Care
Not when those voices are threatening to cut off funding if the party doesn't march to their drum.
Hmmm..... that cutting off funding seems to be a new toy for you lefties, huh?
hahaha! Yeah, the next thing to be cut off is their noses to spite their faces!
They are willing to sell out their country for political gain - why not?
I am not certain it is all for political gain Red....The citizens that the Democrats REPRESENT and the ones pushing congress on the issue of the putting an end to our occupation in Iraq....and getting the Dems in congress pretty upset with them.....did you see the Congressman Obbey incident where he yells at some anti-warrers?
The Democrats in Congress don't know how to handle it.... they are used to all of us ignoring what they do and not being told what to do...
Well, life has changed for those Dems in power
care
Life was changed, but not for the better for Amercians
The terrorists yes - Americans no
The reason Obbey yelled was because he knew the Dems has to answer to the anti war left that voted for them
Amercia did not vote for Dems to surender in Iraq - they want to win the war
Well, White Flag Harry Reid said we lost
Have mistakes been made - you bet. No war has been fought without mistakes
But the surrender plan the Dems voted on solves nothing - except give the terrorists a victory in Iraq
Harry Reid stuck his foot in his mouth with that comment! grrrrrrrrrrrrrrr!
But you all are doing the EXACT SAME THING, by calling the redeployment a surrender bill...
That can't be good for the troops that hear YOU say they are surrenderers, when they won the war imo, when you could say that you don't agree with the redeployment change in strategy but instead you tell the soldiers that they are going to be FORCED to surrender... that just can't be good for them...
But YOU and your party CHOSE to call it a surrender bill and chose to make the troops feel like shit is how I view it! Honestly, I don't think you should say things like surrender if you REALLY care about the troops and ARE NOT DOING THIS and saying this JUST for POLITICAL GAIN....OR POLITICAL POSTURING. It may make you feel better, but it certainly can not help the moral of the troops red?
By teling the enemy when we will leave is surrender
The troops are not happy with White Flag Harry and they are starting to voice their feelings
http://www.usmessageboard.com/showthread.php?t=48291
According to the residents of Iraq there is no civil war
By leaving, the Dems will turn over Iraq to the terrorists and Iran
They will then have a country to plan their continued terror attacks
They will have money from oil revenues to finance their terror operations
They will then kill millions of people (thise who helped the US, elected oficials, the Police, the militray, ect)
Then it will only be a matter of time before the terrorists and Iran have nukes
Guess what happens next?
I wholeheartedly disagree with your dismal projection of the outcome...
The Iraqis do not want Iran to take over their oil so they won't let that happen...it is in Iran's interest to have a peaceful Iraq...with shiites being the majority rule.
The Iraqis do not want Alqaeda to take over their oil, so that won't happen
Who will kill millions of people? Alqaeda? Seriously....they are not that strong, and if the success that the military has recently had among the Sunni themselves going against Alqaeda for causing havoc then we have made some true progress....
We are also speaking of leaving special forces to go after alqaeda....
Care
