acludem said:The U.S. agreed to this when they signed the treaty. Why are all you Righties so afraid? Are you afraid that Jeb Bush and Katharine Harris won't be able to steal the election if you need them to again?
ROFLMFAO!!!!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
acludem said:The U.S. agreed to this when they signed the treaty. Why are all you Righties so afraid? Are you afraid that Jeb Bush and Katharine Harris won't be able to steal the election if you need them to again?
acludem said:The U.S. agreed to this when they signed the treaty. Why are all you Righties so afraid? Are you afraid that Jeb Bush and Katharine Harris won't be able to steal the election if you need them to again?
Gore fought tooth and nail because the election was decided only by a handful of votes (well 5 on the Supreme Court to be exact). If the shoe had been on the other foot, Dubya would've done the same. Once the election was decided, Gore accepted his fate and moved on. He even presided over the actual count of the electoral votes in Congress.
acludem
ScreamingEagle said:So the UN becomes the tie-breaker if the election is close?
That's POWER we are giving away to the outside the world. I can't believe that Bush invited them to "observe". What's up with that?!
Of course the left wants us to become "acclimated" to the idea of UN or world power. They will do it in baby steps like this. The clash of the last election is NO reason for bringing in outside observers. Either our system works or it doesn't. This invitation of other countries is almost a tacit agreement that it doesn't.
Just because the liberals raised a BIG STINK last election does not mean that our system is not working. This is almost like rewarding the liberals for being sore losers. The liberals are so disrespectful of our U.S. system of government! Besides they WANT world government. This is just giving them what they want.
We must NEVER allow other countries to observe our elections with the purpose of being a referee.
acludem said:The U.S. agreed to this when they signed the treaty. Why are all you Righties so afraid? Are you afraid that Jeb Bush and Katharine Harris won't be able to steal the election if you need them to again?
Gore fought tooth and nail because the election was decided only by a handful of votes (well 5 on the Supreme Court to be exact). If the shoe had been on the other foot, Dubya would've done the same. Once the election was decided, Gore accepted his fate and moved on. He even presided over the actual count of the electoral votes in Congress.
acludem
Brown has left a trail of unpaid bills from businesses she owned in Gainesville, Jacksonville and Tallahassee during the early 1990s.
In 1994, a consortium of airlines sued Brown for $94,000 in because her company, Springfield Travel Agency Inc., falsified sales reports and did not pay its bills. Delta Air Lines revoked her authority to write tickets because of an unpaid $7,237 bill. She also owed $5,697 to the University of Florida and tried to pay part of the bill with a bad check.
The IRS also went after Brown for $14,228 in unpaid taxes and the Whirlpool Corp. had to go to court to try and collect $10,227 in unpaid bills for appliances
Jimmyeatworld said:I don't know what treaty you're talking about, but nobody is afraid of anything. I think it's quite obvious that President Bush isn't afraid. It's just a shame that a bunch of whiny, bitchy Democrats and conspiracy theorists have driven things to the point that something like this is even considered. When Kerry loses in November, I hope all the Dems remember this was their idea and it's their own fault they won't be able to scream about the election being stolen.
dilloduck said:I see you are as uneasy about nov 3 as I am.
DKSuddeth said:I look at it this way, If GW wins in a landslide then the dems need to shut up and rethink their ideas. If Kerry wins by a landslide then not only the repubs, but america itself needs to rethink what it is that they want. If its close in one state and they hash it out once and the results are the same, leave it. If theres a need to investigate it, fine, do so quickly. If theres malicious intent on rigging the outcome, shoot the bastards.
tim_duncan2000 said:These people have no business doing this. I hate this idea.
fubar said:People will accept anything nowadays. Which is one big reason why Bush better win, or we'll be seeing the UN run our military, the rich taxed into oblivion, the illegal immigrants getting bussed in by the Californis mass transit system, the second ammendment redefined to mean only the ATF and rich Dems.
Does anyone know the tax rate increase that made Sam & John Adams decide to start shooting ?
Kathianne said:I have to agree with you Dillo. Totally out of control. Where are the grown-ups?