Someone must say No. I will (Bachmann)

lol.. no surprises that tea loons would vote against anything that doesn't destroy the economy.

I disagree with the premise of an editorial in the NYT, from Krugman, that asserts Obama surrendered. I think he got what he could get, keeping in mind he is dealing with dogma in the House. I have seen surrender editorials on both sides of the isle. It is what it is...
 
Way to go Tea Bagger.....drive us off that cliff

Just to prove a point
 
lol.. no surprises that tea loons would vote against anything that doesn't destroy the economy.

I disagree with the premise of an editorial in the NYT, from Krugman, that asserts Obama surrendered. I think he got what he could get, keeping in mind he is dealing with dogma in the House. I have seen surrender editorials on both sides of the isle. It is what it is...

Obama caved big time

As usual, there were no concessions from the right
 
lol.. no surprises that tea loons would vote against anything that doesn't destroy the economy.

I disagree with the premise of an editorial in the NYT, from Krugman, that asserts Obama surrendered. I think he got what he could get, keeping in mind he is dealing with dogma in the House. I have seen surrender editorials on both sides of the isle. It is what it is...

Obama caved big time

As usual, there were no concessions from the right

The problem is... Democrats have a large disparity in their caucus. they range from far left socialists to blue dogs Conservatives... and they vote their conscience. The GOP on the other hand, has it's disparities too... but they tend to have their shit together a little better and vote pretty much in unison. I don't know how they do it so consistently, but I gotta give them credit where credit is due. Their party is the most organized.

Of course, Boehner is now getting a taste of dissent in his own caucus, something that Dems have been dealing with forever.
 

Forum List

Back
Top