CurveLight
Rookie
- Oct 16, 2009
- 9,768
- 317
- 0
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #101
However when representing yourself as a member of the military and saying these things it is no longer considered protected speech. It is considered mutiny at the extreme edge and derelection of duty/failure to maintain good order and dicipline at the least.
He didn't do the song to represent the military. He did it to represent himself in protest for being forced to stay in the military a full year past his contract.
His contract was for 8 YEARS. 4 on active duty and 4 more where he could be CALLED to active DUTY. Guess what? They called him. You may want to actually learn what you are talking about before you sound off like an idiot.
It's always funny when people like yourself make assumptions them do a little soap box parade based o your owm ignorance. If you had paid attention at all to the thread you would know I'm aware of the IRR. Maybe you don't have the balls to be honest about it but I know for the longest time it was commonly understood the chances of being called up on IRR were very slim. Many Troops, over 180,000 have been hit with Stop Loss. I'm not complaining about the program itself. I'm saying all soldiers should share in the responsibility. Instead of doing a stop loss on all active duty we should rotate a certain percentage of the RR. Why only activate those on active duty? Why not hold the RRs accountable for their obligation?
(btw, did you ever come to terms with the fact it was the CPA that gave Blackwater full immunity and not any Treaty with Iraq? Yeah. It pisses me off when you bitch up and down about being informed but refuse to admit when you are guilty of ignorance. I'll call you out every time.)