Hi. this might be a little sophisticated. Whithout any rating which system might be better, i like to ask the question to which level a state should gives his citizens social safety. Would a "right of food" or a "right of a place to live", a "right of free studies" or "right of health care" be useful? On the one hand, it would be a reason to do so because the people could put more power into personal development, when they needn´t to be afraid to fall down anytime. On the other hand, the danger is given to produce a society of lazy and demotivated citizens, which aren´t interested in any personal development anyway. How much responsibility should a state take from his citizens? How much freedom could been handled by a single man-inside a community?