danielpalos
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #521
yes or no questions are usually a form of special pleading, in this case, by begging the question of accepting your false dichotomy.It has to do with employment at will; there is no appeal to ignorance of the law. If you refuse to be responsive, that is grounds ending your Standing in any serious discussion, but most especially, in legal venues.dude; argumentum ad hominem is a fallacy. why not argue the point, unless you want to cede the argument.simply resorting to fallacy is an "abomination" against philosophy if not religion.
So, that's you failing to answer my question.
Given your behavior, and the consensus on it, I think my question is very fair.
If you are somehow unaware that you are being rude, that goes back to my suggestions that there is really something wrong with you.
I do not believe that is the case.
IMO, you are likely just a very pretentious communist who is trying to cloak his real agenda with unclear jargon and poor sentence structure.
With various rationalizations as to why it is ok of your to be dishonest in avoiding real dialog well trolling those few who are willing to talk with you.
I have repeatedly explained why I cannot argue the point. Because you do not present your point in a understandable manner.
I am not attacking you personally. I am seriously and constructively pointing out that either your communication skills or your purposeful obtuseness is making communication difficult if not impossible.
For example. From what you have presented, it appears to me that you are a communist.
I have repeatedly asked you if this is true.
Your response has, at best, been incoherent gibberish.
I ask again, are you a communist?
And you failed to answer a simple yes or no question.
You are either messed up, or very rude.
The non answer you did post is nothing but gibberish and self serving blather.
What do you think you are doing?
can you re-phrase your question?