So why did the left change their minds

[Fair&Balanced]

TWO TIMES IN A ROW the left has nominated a neocon to take their political party to the WH. The first time, they didn't know... Obama was so full of shit.. But now, they do KNOW but they don't fuckin care.

Only this time, they are doubling down on their stupidity by nominating a CRIMINAL.

 

[HappyJoy]

And the GOP, the party stereotyped as the party of old, rich white men, has chosen the oldest, richest white man in the history of American politics to be their nominee

See, I get what you are saying, but my POINT is that the left actually talks shit about those qualities.
So, what about the OP?

No, the left talks shit about those qualities when those are the only qualities a political party fights for.

dude, are you fuckin retarded?

The Democratic party is more diverse. Wants a higher minimum wage, raise taxes on the very wealthy, provide a strong social safety net and invest in our infrastructure there by creating jobs for those other than the super rich.

You're questions was retarded and you're doing what the right always claims the left is doing and playing identity politics.

Hillary Clinton is a goddamn corporatist, you fuckin retard.
diverse = old white socialist and old white rich corrupt neocon

Diverse = we accept all ages and races.

 

[HappyJoy]

"creating jobs for those other than the super rich"

Yeah, didn't work so well under Bush. When was the last time the Republican Congress tried to push through a jobs bill?

 

[OldLady]

TWO TIMES IN A ROW the left has nominated a neocon to take their political party to the WH. The first time, they didn't know... Obama was so full of shit.. But now, they do KNOW but they don't fuckin care.

I don't know what a neocon is, in your world.

 

[OldLady]

See, I get what you are saying, but my POINT is that the left actually talks shit about those qualities.
So, what about the OP?

No, the left talks shit about those qualities when those are the only qualities a political party fights for.

dude, are you fuckin retarded?

The Democratic party is more diverse. Wants a higher minimum wage, raise taxes on the very wealthy, provide a strong social safety net and invest in our infrastructure there by creating jobs for those other than the super rich.

You're questions was retarded and you're doing what the right always claims the left is doing and playing identity politics.

Hillary Clinton is a goddamn corporatist, you fuckin retard.
diverse = old white socialist and old white rich corrupt neocon

Diverse = we accept all ages and races.

And histories of criminal involvement

 

[Pogo]

TWO TIMES IN A ROW the left has nominated a neocon to take their political party to the WH. The first time, they didn't know... Obama was so full of shit.. But now, they do KNOW but they don't fuckin care.

Here's your problem.

When you say "the left" ---- what you're really trying to say is "the Democratic Party".
"The left" doesn't nominate anybody. If you think the DP is "the left", I've got some Pacific Ocean property. In Tennessee.

Say what you mean. You'll make more sense.

 

[Fueri]

and decide and old, white, rich, corrupt, neocon is their best choice? I thought those were all marks of evil and bush?

Hillary's latest campaign slogan:

Yes, she's an old, white, rich, corrupt, neocon, but she's OUR old, white, rich, corrupt, neocon!

 

[Fair&Balanced]

"creating jobs for those other than the super rich"

Yeah, didn't work so well under Bush. When was the last time the Republican Congress tried to push through a jobs bill?

Congress can't pass a bill that creates private sector jobs you fucking fool.

 

[TNHarley]

See, I get what you are saying, but my POINT is that the left actually talks shit about those qualities.
So, what about the OP?

No, the left talks shit about those qualities when those are the only qualities a political party fights for.

dude, are you fuckin retarded?

The Democratic party is more diverse. Wants a higher minimum wage, raise taxes on the very wealthy, provide a strong social safety net and invest in our infrastructure there by creating jobs for those other than the super rich.

You're questions was retarded and you're doing what the right always claims the left is doing and playing identity politics.

Hillary Clinton is a goddamn corporatist, you fuckin retard.
diverse = old white socialist and old white rich corrupt neocon

Diverse = we accept all ages and races.

so do you have an actual comment to the OP or are you just going to continue hacking it up?

 

[Tuatara]

I've never seen the Democratic Party as left. There have been some left-leaning candidates like Kucinich or Saunders but most have had more central political leanings. When it comes to foreign policy, every Democratic leader has been conservative.

 

[TNHarley]

TWO TIMES IN A ROW the left has nominated a neocon to take their political party to the WH. The first time, they didn't know... Obama was so full of shit.. But now, they do KNOW but they don't fuckin care.

I don't know what a neocon is, in your world.

what is a neocon in your world?

 

[TNHarley]

TWO TIMES IN A ROW the left has nominated a neocon to take their political party to the WH. The first time, they didn't know... Obama was so full of shit.. But now, they do KNOW but they don't fuckin care.

Here's your problem.

When you say "the left" ---- what you're really trying to say is "the Democratic Party".
"The left" doesn't nominate anybody. If you think the DP is "the left", I've got some Pacific Ocean property. In Tennessee.

Say what you mean. You'll make more sense.

mr semantics is here to argue absolutely nothing.

 

[NightFox]

and decide and old, white, rich, corrupt, neocon is their best choice? I thought those were all marks of evil and bush?

Because she's their old,white,rich,corrupt, neocon AND she's got the right letter behind her name.

Partisanship; the drug that makes you forget your principles, your ethics and your entire past.

 

[Fair&Balanced]

See, I get what you are saying, but my POINT is that the left actually talks shit about those qualities.
So, what about the OP?

No, the left talks shit about those qualities when those are the only qualities a political party fights for.

dude, are you fuckin retarded?

The Democratic party is more diverse. Wants a higher minimum wage, raise taxes on the very wealthy, provide a strong social safety net and invest in our infrastructure there by creating jobs for those other than the super rich.

You're questions was retarded and you're doing what the right always claims the left is doing and playing identity politics.

Hillary Clinton is a goddamn corporatist, you fuckin retard.
diverse = old white socialist and old white rich corrupt neocon

Diverse = we accept all ages and races.

what a racist comment. Why do you liberals racists assume that all minorities agree with your liberal agenda? They don't. Oh I realize you think blacks are inferior and therefor can't think for themselves, but they can and many of them no longer fall for the liberal bullshit.

Same with women, they are smart enough to see through the "you should vote Dem b/c we're running a woman for God's sakes. "

See, you liberals think women are stupid and will just blindly vote for Hillary for no other reason than she is a woman , nevermind the actual qualities she possesses which would help her do the job (which she doesn't have) there is a special place in hell for all women who don't vote for Hillary, just like any person who didn't vote for Obama was a racist, according to you idiots.

 

[Fair&Balanced]

TWO TIMES IN A ROW the left has nominated a neocon to take their political party to the WH. The first time, they didn't know... Obama was so full of shit.. But now, they do KNOW but they don't fuckin care.

Here's your problem.

When you say "the left" ---- what you're really trying to say is "the Democratic Party".
"The left" doesn't nominate anybody. If you think the DP is "the left", I've got some Pacific Ocean property. In Tennessee.

Say what you mean. You'll make more sense.

mr semantics is here to argue absolutely nothing.

You'd be well served to just pretend Pogo doesn't exist. He truly is stupid.

 

[Pogo]

TWO TIMES IN A ROW the left has nominated a neocon to take their political party to the WH. The first time, they didn't know... Obama was so full of shit.. But now, they do KNOW but they don't fuckin care.

Here's your problem.

When you say "the left" ---- what you're really trying to say is "the Democratic Party".
"The left" doesn't nominate anybody. If you think the DP is "the left", I've got some Pacific Ocean property. In Tennessee.

Say what you mean. You'll make more sense.

mr semantics is here to argue absolutely nothing.

You're actually gonna plant your flag on the premise that "the left" is the same thing as "the Democratic Party"? That there are real differences between the Duopoly Party?

Kinda shoots your whole OP premise in the foot, doncha think? Which way you wanna play this, Ace?

By the way --- when was this nomination? Did I oversleep?

 

[NYcarbineer]

and decide and old, white, rich, corrupt, neocon is their best choice? I thought those were all marks of evil and bush?

The 'left' didn't. The center and right of the Democratic party is where Hillary's support comes from.

 

[Pogo]

I've never seen the Democratic Party as left. There have been some left-leaning candidates like Kucinich or Saunders but most have had more central political leanings. When it comes to foreign policy, every Democratic leader has been conservative.

Apparently the OP doesn't want that level of complexity. And yet he wants to imagine what "the left" is. From what I gather "the left" had a convention somewhere. Even nominated somebody.
Doublethink lives.

 

[Grizz]

and decide and old, white, rich, corrupt, neocon is their best choice? I thought those were all marks of evil and bush?

And the GOP, the party stereotyped as the party of old, rich white men, has chosen the oldest, richest white man in the history of American politics to be their nominee

See, I get what you are saying, but my POINT is that the left actually talks shit about those qualities.
So, what about the OP?

No, the left talks shit about those qualities when those are the only qualities a political party fights for.

dude, are you fuckin retarded?

The Democratic party is more diverse. Wants a higher minimum wage, raise taxes on the very wealthy, provide a strong social safety net and invest in our infrastructure there by creating jobs for those other than the super rich.

You're questions was retarded and you're doing what the right always claims the left is doing and playing identity politics.

The Left has had 16 of the last 24 years to get those things done. They've done nothing but further enrich themselves (the political leaders) except use those same tired old talking points that STILL fool you into voting for them.

 

[TNHarley]

and decide and old, white, rich, corrupt, neocon is their best choice? I thought those were all marks of evil and bush?

The 'left' didn't. The center and right of the Democratic party is where Hillary's support comes from.

so the center and right side of the democrat party don't mind old, rich, white, corrupt neocons?