So, anti gunners who say no one wants to take our guns...what about the 4th circuit gun ban?

[there4eyeM]

Dredd Scott just goes to demonstrate the evolution of thought, morals and social consciousness.

 

[2aguy]

This is how vile the left is.....when they wanted to ban Stun guns...they said that they could be banned because they couldn't be used by the military, and weren't covered by the Second Amendment....now, they say that AR-15s, a civilian rifle, is a weapon of war, and can't be covered by the 2nd Amendment......

This is the ruling from Caetano..

Caetano v. Massachusetts - Wikipedia

Opinion of the Court[edit]

In a per curiam decision, the Supreme Court vacated the ruling of the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court.[7] Citing District of Columbia v. Heller[8] and McDonald v. City of Chicago,[9] the Court began its opinion by stating that "the Second Amendment extends, prima facie, to all instruments that constitute bearable arms, even those that were not in existence at the time of the founding" and that "the Second Amendment right is fully applicable to the States".[6]


The Court then identified three reasons why the Massachusetts court's opinion contradicted prior rulings by the United States Supreme Court.[1]

First, the Massachusetts court said that stun guns could be banned because they "were not in common use at the time of the Second Amendment’s enactment", but the Supreme Court noted that this contradicted Heller's conclusion that Second Amendment protects "arms ... that were not in existence at the time of the founding”.[10]


Second, the Massachusetts court said that stun guns were "dangerous per se at common law and unusual" because they were "a thoroughly modern invention", but the Supreme Court held that this was also inconstant with Heller.[11]



Third, the Massachusetts court said that stun guns could be banned because they were not "readily adaptable to use in the military", but the Supreme Court held that Heller rejected the argument that "only those weapons useful in warfare" were protected by the Second Amendment.[12]

 

[2aguy]

Dredd Scott just goes to demonstrate the evolution of thought, morals and social consciousness.

Yep.......but the democrats still haven't outgrown their ignorance on race.....they are stil the racist party.....


And the 2nd Amendment has history and law and common sense on it's side.....but the left wing social justice warriors in robes do not care about any of those things...they are democrats, again......trying to deny another fundamental Right to the American people......they are always on the wrong side of individual freedom...

 

[Skull Pilot]

You have guns.

You don't have a constitutional right to weapons of war.

Then i assume you are against NYC's law that makes me wait 6 months and pay $1000 in fees to get a revolver, right?

I am against the "negligence" of a State, that fails to provide wellness of regulation free of charge, to the unorganized militia, in a more easy and convenient manner.

Can you ever answer a question simply?

he's too simple to do that

Only the simples don't understand the question was answered.

you haven't traded posts with DP much have you?

 

[danielpalos]

]So your poor language and your behavior kicking your heels on the floor and crying merely means you don't like the law. Work to change it.

The real issue is that you are a libertarian, a lame brained political philosophy if ever one existed, where the strong torture the weak who have no protection of law.

Answer the question. And the law should have been overturned decades ago.

And that's anarchy, something your side of the aisle has on their fringe element.

ANSWER THE QUESTION YOU DIME STORE HACK.

Your question was easily answered and more easily dismissed.

You didn't answer it, and you can never dismiss it.

Answer the question.

what is the question?

 

[JakeStarkey]

He does not understand the 2d Amendment is the problem.

Marty filters his beliefs through a libertarian philosophy and gets very, very lost.

 

[danielpalos]

He does not understand the 2d Amendment is the problem.

Marty filters his beliefs through a libertarian philosophy and gets very, very lost.

what is the question?

 

[Uncensored2008]

Robert King needs to be impeached, and impeached today. Write your congress critter and demand he be impeached for flagrant violation of his oath of office to uphold the Constitution of the United States.

Until some of these scum are removed from office, they will continue to press the boundaries and defecate on the bill of rights at every opportunity.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Down, boy, not going to happen.