Snopes has had a busy year

[Gadawg73]

I'd like to hear what sites you DO think are credible CMike and Avatar. (since so far you two are the only ones commenting on this saying it's not credible.)

SarahPalin.com

 

[CMike]

Still a left-wing organization.

Why am I suppose to trust Free Republic? Last I checked, nobody at Snopes had murdered a man in cold blood. Free Republic can't say the same.

Link?

 

[CMike]

All sources are biased. Since humans are biased, everything they write or say is biased.

The trick is to have the brains to research something for yourself and see whom said what.

I remember in another forum a left wing mod chick ended threads by posting from factcheck, yet another left wing organization that claims to be unbiased.

 

[CMike]

And I care what snopes says because?

Snopes is one of the most non-partisan myth busters on the internet. I think it says something about each side when Obama has more than double the false rumors being spread about in less than two years then Bush in eight years.

As someone that has held an investigative agency license for 30 years and investigated over 5000 cases, over 750 for trial, I second this post.

Some of you still believe Obama is a Muslim born in Kenya. Jesus could come again and tell you otherwise and you would still believe wnd.

You had cases about Obama, bush, and Clinton?

 

[xsited1]

Rumors and Partisan Politics Sociological Images
...

Snopes has a proven Left-wing bias, which is unfortunate since it would be nice to have a neutral source. In any case, the Republicans don't need to make stuff up about Obama. He is already on his way to being remembered as a President worse than Jimmy Carter, why the need to fabricate anything?

 

[rightwinger]

Rumors and Partisan Politics Sociological Images
...

Snopes has a proven Left-wing bias, which is unfortunate since it would be nice to have a neutral source. In any case, the Republicans don't need to make stuff up about Obama. He is already on his way to being remembered as a President worse than Jimmy Carter, why the need to fabricate anything?

Then why do you do it day in, day out?

Why the nonstop lies and half truths?

 

[Gadawg73]

All sources are biased. Since humans are biased, everything they write or say is biased.

The trick is to have the brains to research something for yourself and see whom said what.

I remember in another forum a left wing mod chick ended threads by posting from factcheck, yet another left wing organization that claims to be unbiased.

True but sometimes bias leads to outright LIES and sometimes not.
Obama claims that he is a Muslim and born in Kenya are biased LIES.
My bias that Big Ben is an over rated QB is not a lie. It is opinion only.
Knowing the difference is an intelligent thought process.
Some go the extra mile to do that and some rely on IDEOLOGY only.

 

[paperview]

Rumors and Partisan Politics Sociological Images
...

Snopes has a proven Left-wing bias...

It's a well known fact: Truth has a liberal bias.

 

[Gadawg73]

Snopes is one of the most non-partisan myth busters on the internet. I think it says something about each side when Obama has more than double the false rumors being spread about in less than two years then Bush in eight years.

As someone that has held an investigative agency license for 30 years and investigated over 5000 cases, over 750 for trial, I second this post.

Some of you still believe Obama is a Muslim born in Kenya. Jesus could come again and tell you otherwise and you would still believe wnd.

You had cases about Obama, bush, and Clinton?

Obama no
Bush no
Clinton No comment

 

[CMike]

All sources are biased. Since humans are biased, everything they write or say is biased.

The trick is to have the brains to research something for yourself and see whom said what.

I remember in another forum a left wing mod chick ended threads by posting from factcheck, yet another left wing organization that claims to be unbiased.

True but sometimes bias leads to outright LIES and sometimes not.
Obama claims that he is a Muslim and born in Kenya are biased LIES.
My bias that Big Ben is an over rated QB is not a lie. It is opinion only.
Knowing the difference is an intelligent thought process.
Some go the extra mile to do that and some rely on IDEOLOGY only.

That michelle Obama said that Baraks home country is Kenya is a fact, I can prove it.

That home country means the country that you were born in is a fact. I can prove it.

There is certainly reasonable doubt where Obama was born.

The problem is that libs rely solely on their left wing organizations for their conclusions . The libs want to believe these conclusions and are extremely gullible.

I have found very little that libs say is true, I just assume it's false.

With libs I use the don't trust and and show it philosophy .

 

[Modbert]

Link?

Free Republic - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

James von Brunn, the white supremacist who killed the guard at the Holocaust Museum in Washington, DC on June 10, 2009, had a post that was copied from another site pasted into a topic which was an article claiming that President Barack Obama had no birth certificate, a view held by so-called "birthers" such as von Brunn.[55] The thread was deleted by moderators after the shooting but later restored when a review found that it had not violated any posting guidelines.[56]

I wonder if you or any of your pals had linked to here on USMB from that murderer.

Oh and this:

Despite this willingness to ban users, however, critics have charged that the lack of moderating on the site has allowed some users to advertise underage pornography: "One thing that apparently won't result in a ban: using the site solely to boost Web ranking for your child porn site."[61]

So CMike gets his news from a website that has posts by murderers and child porn advocates who advertise on FR.

 

[xsited1]

Rumors and Partisan Politics Sociological Images
...

Snopes has a proven Left-wing bias, which is unfortunate since it would be nice to have a neutral source. In any case, the Republicans don't need to make stuff up about Obama. He is already on his way to being remembered as a President worse than Jimmy Carter, why the need to fabricate anything?

Then why do you do it day in, day out?

Why the nonstop lies and half truths?

That's pretty funny coming from you!

 

[Meister]

Snopes has a proven Left-wing bias, which is unfortunate since it would be nice to have a neutral source. In any case, the Republicans don't need to make stuff up about Obama. He is already on his way to being remembered as a President worse than Jimmy Carter, why the need to fabricate anything?

Then why do you do it day in, day out?

Why the nonstop lies and half truths?

That's pretty funny coming from you!

Xsited has a point there, Leftwinger.

 

[CMike]

Link?

Despite this willingness to ban users, however, critics have charged that the lack of moderating on the site has

So CMike gets his news from a website that has posts by murderers and child porn advocates who advertise on FR.

So a post that has a link to another post is supposed to mean something about the magazine?

While we are on the topic Obama s campaign web site had the endorsement of the black panthers. Yet, you voted for someone who displayed the endorsement of a terrorist organization?

 

[Modbert]

So a post that has a link to another post is supposed to mean something about the magazine?

While we are on the topic Obama s campaign web site had the endorsement of the black panthers. Yet, you voted for someone who displayed the endorsement of a terrorist organization?

Link? And hey, you're the one who gets his news from a website that bans you if you're left of Sarah Palin but won't ban you for posting CP. Don't blame me or drag in Obama on that one.

 

[CMike]

I get news straight from the sources: actual documents, YouTube, transcripts etc.

 

[Modbert]

I get news straight from the sources: actual documents, YouTube, transcripts etc.

So that means you can't give me a link? And I don't think so, especially since you posted a Free Republic post for this thread.

 

[CMike]

So a post that has a link to another post is supposed to mean something about the magazine?

While we are on the topic Obama s campaign web site had the endorsement of the black panthers. Yet, you voted for someone who displayed the endorsement of a terrorist organization?

Link? And hey, you're the one who gets his news from a website that bans you if you're left of Sarah Palin but won't ban you for posting CP. Don't blame me or drag in Obama on that one.

Not at the moment, I will later. I'm not on my computer.

 

[Si modo]

Still a left-wing organization.

Why am I suppose to trust Free Republic? Last I checked, nobody at Snopes had murdered a man in cold blood. Free Republic can't say the same.

Wanna link to the story about this 'murder of a man in cold blood' by an internet forum?

 

[Modbert]

Wanna link to the story about this 'murder of a man in cold blood' by an internet forum?

Obviously I was saying that nobody at Snopes has killed anyone, Free Republic can't say the same. Linking from Free Republic is no different then someone linking from a different thread here at USMB and calling it a source.