Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm not sure why the right is so dead against Snopes. They try to claim it's biased because it's owned by (insert democrats/Soros/etc)....it's not. It's a good source. It's non-partisan. It becomes partisan when it doesn't agree with you.
What you are doing is stating that Snopes factchecking can't be accurate because they are run by rabid leftists according to a site run by rabid rightists. Do you see the issue with logic here?
Why is it so hard for people like you to look beyond the headlines to actually READ the information provided? Regardless of where this came from, there are links to other sources to prove what is being reported. Sadly, people like you are incapable of accepting the truth that doesn't fit with your views.
Well, to reply to the "people like you" claim...let me state this.
Why is it so hard for people like you to look beyond the headlines and actually READ what Snopes writes? Regardless of what you think of them, their analysis is completely right on.
Now, that is all I'm going to say about people like you because people like you can't seem to accept anything that doesn't conform to your partisan view.
I've read what Snopes writers and there can be no doubt of the ultra-left bias in every single article.
Oh? What did they get wrong?
Snopes Caught Lying For Hillary Again, Questions Raised @ Snopes Caught Lying For Hillary Again, Questions Raised
All one has to do is conduct a Google or Bing search to find example after example of biased pieces published in Snopes. Try it for yourself - if you dare.
Many on the Left still get their news from sources proven to be biased toward the D party. Apparently they like their news biased, since none of the so called journalists or reporters exposed by Wikileaks, have been fired.Why is it so hard for people like you to look beyond the headlines to actually READ the information provided? Regardless of where this came from, there are links to other sources to prove what is being reported. Sadly, people like you are incapable of accepting the truth that doesn't fit with your views.
Well, to reply to the "people like you" claim...let me state this.
Why is it so hard for people like you to look beyond the headlines and actually READ what Snopes writes? Regardless of what you think of them, their analysis is completely right on.
Now, that is all I'm going to say about people like you because people like you can't seem to accept anything that doesn't conform to your partisan view.
I've read what Snopes writers and there can be no doubt of the ultra-left bias in every single article.
Oh? What did they get wrong?
Snopes Caught Lying For Hillary Again, Questions Raised @ Snopes Caught Lying For Hillary Again, Questions Raised
All one has to do is conduct a Google or Bing search to find example after example of biased pieces published in Snopes. Try it for yourself - if you dare.
So you're trying to use a fake news site to discredit Snopes. That's just pathetic.
Many on the Left still get their news from sources proven to be biased toward the D party. Apparently they like their news biased, since none of the so called journalists or reporters exposed by Wikileaks, have been fired.Well, to reply to the "people like you" claim...let me state this.
Why is it so hard for people like you to look beyond the headlines and actually READ what Snopes writes? Regardless of what you think of them, their analysis is completely right on.
Now, that is all I'm going to say about people like you because people like you can't seem to accept anything that doesn't conform to your partisan view.
I've read what Snopes writers and there can be no doubt of the ultra-left bias in every single article.
Oh? What did they get wrong?
Snopes Caught Lying For Hillary Again, Questions Raised @ Snopes Caught Lying For Hillary Again, Questions Raised
All one has to do is conduct a Google or Bing search to find example after example of biased pieces published in Snopes. Try it for yourself - if you dare.
So you're trying to use a fake news site to discredit Snopes. That's just pathetic.
Little Upchuck Todd is still doing Meet the Press....amazingly.
Apparently you are uninformed.Many on the Left still get their news from sources proven to be biased toward the D party. Apparently they like their news biased, since none of the so called journalists or reporters exposed by Wikileaks, have been fired.I've read what Snopes writers and there can be no doubt of the ultra-left bias in every single article.
Oh? What did they get wrong?
Snopes Caught Lying For Hillary Again, Questions Raised @ Snopes Caught Lying For Hillary Again, Questions Raised
All one has to do is conduct a Google or Bing search to find example after example of biased pieces published in Snopes. Try it for yourself - if you dare.
So you're trying to use a fake news site to discredit Snopes. That's just pathetic.
Little Upchuck Todd is still doing Meet the Press....amazingly.
It's noted that Russia only released names to wiki that don't fall into the Alex Jones / Hannity fake news category..
Apparently you are uninformed.Many on the Left still get their news from sources proven to be biased toward the D party. Apparently they like their news biased, since none of the so called journalists or reporters exposed by Wikileaks, have been fired.Oh? What did they get wrong?
Snopes Caught Lying For Hillary Again, Questions Raised @ Snopes Caught Lying For Hillary Again, Questions Raised
All one has to do is conduct a Google or Bing search to find example after example of biased pieces published in Snopes. Try it for yourself - if you dare.
So you're trying to use a fake news site to discredit Snopes. That's just pathetic.
Little Upchuck Todd is still doing Meet the Press....amazingly.
It's noted that Russia only released names to wiki that don't fall into the Alex Jones / Hannity fake news category..
Emails by those listed above prove collusion. Those listed were actively working for Clinton's election and against Trump.
That is the problem with some lefties. You are generally uninformed so facts surprise you.
One does have to be able to put 2 and 2 together. Amazingly, lefties can only do this with Rs.Apparently you are uninformed.Many on the Left still get their news from sources proven to be biased toward the D party. Apparently they like their news biased, since none of the so called journalists or reporters exposed by Wikileaks, have been fired.Snopes Caught Lying For Hillary Again, Questions Raised @ Snopes Caught Lying For Hillary Again, Questions Raised
All one has to do is conduct a Google or Bing search to find example after example of biased pieces published in Snopes. Try it for yourself - if you dare.
So you're trying to use a fake news site to discredit Snopes. That's just pathetic.
Little Upchuck Todd is still doing Meet the Press....amazingly.
It's noted that Russia only released names to wiki that don't fall into the Alex Jones / Hannity fake news category..
Emails by those listed above prove collusion. Those listed were actively working for Clinton's election and against Trump.
That is the problem with some lefties. You are generally uninformed so facts surprise you.
Of course a fake news junkie like you would think that
This is good too...if you care to be informed...from months ago.One does have to be able to put 2 and 2 together. Amazingly, lefties can only do this with Rs.Apparently you are uninformed.Many on the Left still get their news from sources proven to be biased toward the D party. Apparently they like their news biased, since none of the so called journalists or reporters exposed by Wikileaks, have been fired.So you're trying to use a fake news site to discredit Snopes. That's just pathetic.
Little Upchuck Todd is still doing Meet the Press....amazingly.
It's noted that Russia only released names to wiki that don't fall into the Alex Jones / Hannity fake news category..
Emails by those listed above prove collusion. Those listed were actively working for Clinton's election and against Trump.
That is the problem with some lefties. You are generally uninformed so facts surprise you.
Of course a fake news junkie like you would think that
WikiLeaks Revelation: MSNBC’s Chuck Todd Takes Marching Orders from DNC
WikiLeaks Revelation: MSNBC’s Chuck Todd Takes Marching Orders from DNC
This is good too...if you care to be informed...from months ago.One does have to be able to put 2 and 2 together. Amazingly, lefties can only do this with Rs.Apparently you are uninformed.Many on the Left still get their news from sources proven to be biased toward the D party. Apparently they like their news biased, since none of the so called journalists or reporters exposed by Wikileaks, have been fired.
Little Upchuck Todd is still doing Meet the Press....amazingly.
It's noted that Russia only released names to wiki that don't fall into the Alex Jones / Hannity fake news category..
Emails by those listed above prove collusion. Those listed were actively working for Clinton's election and against Trump.
That is the problem with some lefties. You are generally uninformed so facts surprise you.
Of course a fake news junkie like you would think that
WikiLeaks Revelation: MSNBC’s Chuck Todd Takes Marching Orders from DNC
WikiLeaks Revelation: MSNBC’s Chuck Todd Takes Marching Orders from DNC
No doubt the fake lib MSM failed to inform you.
WikiLeaks Reveals Media Collusion
WikiLeaks Reveals Media Collusion
I'm not sure why the right is so dead against Snopes. They try to claim it's biased because it's owned by (insert democrats/Soros/etc)....it's not. It's a good source. It's non-partisan. It becomes partisan when it doesn't agree with you.
Who is Alex Jones?This is good too...if you care to be informed...from months ago.One does have to be able to put 2 and 2 together. Amazingly, lefties can only do this with Rs.Apparently you are uninformed.It's noted that Russia only released names to wiki that don't fall into the Alex Jones / Hannity fake news category..
Emails by those listed above prove collusion. Those listed were actively working for Clinton's election and against Trump.
That is the problem with some lefties. You are generally uninformed so facts surprise you.
Of course a fake news junkie like you would think that
WikiLeaks Revelation: MSNBC’s Chuck Todd Takes Marching Orders from DNC
WikiLeaks Revelation: MSNBC’s Chuck Todd Takes Marching Orders from DNC
No doubt the fake lib MSM failed to inform you.
WikiLeaks Reveals Media Collusion
WikiLeaks Reveals Media Collusion
You keep talking, but all I hear is more Alex Jones inspired crap, and a healthy dose of bla-bla-bla
Who is Alex Jones?This is good too...if you care to be informed...from months ago.One does have to be able to put 2 and 2 together. Amazingly, lefties can only do this with Rs.Apparently you are uninformed.
Emails by those listed above prove collusion. Those listed were actively working for Clinton's election and against Trump.
That is the problem with some lefties. You are generally uninformed so facts surprise you.
Of course a fake news junkie like you would think that
WikiLeaks Revelation: MSNBC’s Chuck Todd Takes Marching Orders from DNC
WikiLeaks Revelation: MSNBC’s Chuck Todd Takes Marching Orders from DNC
No doubt the fake lib MSM failed to inform you.
WikiLeaks Reveals Media Collusion
WikiLeaks Reveals Media Collusion
You keep talking, but all I hear is more Alex Jones inspired crap, and a healthy dose of bla-bla-bla
Your shrink?
What you are doing is stating that Snopes factchecking can't be accurate because they are run by rabid leftists according to a site run by rabid rightists. Do you see the issue with logic here?
Why is it so hard for people like you to look beyond the headlines to actually READ the information provided? Regardless of where this came from, there are links to other sources to prove what is being reported. Sadly, people like you are incapable of accepting the truth that doesn't fit with your views.
Well, to reply to the "people like you" claim...let me state this.
Why is it so hard for people like you to look beyond the headlines and actually READ what Snopes writes? Regardless of what you think of them, their analysis is completely right on.
Now, that is all I'm going to say about people like you because people like you can't seem to accept anything that doesn't conform to your partisan view.
I've read what Snopes writers and there can be no doubt of the ultra-left bias in every single article.
Oh? What did they get wrong?
Snopes Caught Lying For Hillary Again, Questions Raised @ Snopes Caught Lying For Hillary Again, Questions Raised
All one has to do is conduct a Google or Bing search to find example after example of biased pieces published in Snopes. Try it for yourself - if you dare.