SNAP (food stamps) should be restricted to rice, flour, rolled oats, and sugar

Why do you have to be told to help them is you claim to care so much for them?
equal protection of the law, is a Constitutional issue.
You already have it.
only in right wing fantasy.

Since you provide less than equal effort, you have equal results to that low level effort. See how that works.
only in right wing fantasy; not resorting to fallacy is simply, superior workmanship.

You're inferior to me in every way.
 
subsidies?

yes, it does apply in this case. you are simply, clueless and Causeless, and have no standing, as a result.

equal protection of the law is in our social Contract. only infidels, protestants, and renegades have a problem with it.

only in right wing fantasy; not resorting to fallacy is simply, superior workmanship.
Their religion is socialism which worships big government and social policy. It is based on atheism and deification of man. It proceeds in almost all its manifestations from the assumption that the basic principles guiding the life of an individual and of mankind in general do not go beyond the satisfaction of material needs or primitive instincts. They have no distinction between good and evil, no morality or any other kind of value, save pleasure. Their doctrine is abolition of private property, abolition of family, abolition of religion and communality or equality. The religious nature of socialism explains its extraordinary ability to incite and inflame its adherents and inspire social movements. They practice moral relativity, indiscriminate indiscriminateness, multiculturalism, cultural marxism and normalization of deviance. Their hostility towards traditional religions is that of an animosity towards a rival religion. They can be identified by an external locus of control. They worship science but are the first to reject it.
too lazy to come up with a valid argument?
That's pretty funny coming from the guy who has made no argument. I'm pretty happy with my argument.

"Socialism intentionally denies examination.There is no formal defined dogma of socialism. Instead there is only a vague, rosy notion of something noble and good, of equality, communal ownership, and justice: the advent of these things will bring instant euphoria and a social order beyond reproach. World socialism as a whole, and all the figures associated with it, are shrouded in legend; its contradictions are forgotten or concealed; it does not respond to arguments but continually ignores them--all this stems from the mist of irrationality that surrounds socialism and from its instinctive aversion to scientific analysis. Socialism dismisses its defeats and ignores its incongruities. Socialism is a reaction: Plato as a reaction to Greek culture, and the Gnostics as a reaction to Christianity. They sought to counteract the endeavor of the human spirit to stand erect, and strove to return to the earthbound existence of the primitive states of antiquity. Socialism diametrically opposes the concepts of man held by religion. Socialism seeks to reduce human personality to its most primitive levels and to extinguish the highest, most complex, and "God-like" aspects of human individuality. And even equality itself, that powerful appeal and great promise of socialists throughout the ages, turns out to signify not equality of rights, of opportunities, and of external conditions, but equality qua identity, equality seen as the movement of variety toward uniformity." Solzhenitsyn

Their religion is socialism which worships big government and social policy. It is based on atheism and deification of man. It proceeds in almost all its manifestations from the assumption that the basic principles guiding the life of an individual and of mankind in general do not go beyond the satisfaction of material needs or primitive instincts. They have no distinction between good and evil, no morality or any other kind of value, save pleasure. Their doctrine is abolition of private property, abolition of family, abolition of religion and communality or equality. The religious nature of socialism explains its extraordinary ability to incite and inflame its adherents and inspire social movements. They practice moral relativity, indiscriminate indiscriminateness, multiculturalism, cultural marxism and normalization of deviance. Their hostility towards traditional religions is that of an animosity towards a rival religion. They can be identified by an external locus of control. They worship science but are the first to reject it.

What was your argument again?
a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage and unemployment compensation at fourteen dollars an hour, solves simple poverty in our republic.
 
I would;

but, it will be less expensive than our current regime. we could be improving the efficiency of our economy and lowering our tax burden at the same time.

Why do you have to be told to help them is you claim to care so much for them?
equal protection of the law, is a Constitutional issue.

Doesn't apply to YOU being responsible for supporting YOU.
the law is the law; there is no appeal to ignorance of the law; only illegals, do that.

The law has to be applied properly. Your application of that isn't. Care to try again? You'll fail again as usual.
10USC311 is also, federal law.
 
Why do you have to be told to help them is you claim to care so much for them?
equal protection of the law, is a Constitutional issue.
You already have it.

That asshole doesn't want equal protection and opportunity. He wants equal results despite providing less than equal effort.
equal protection of the law is in our social Contract. only infidels, protestants, and renegades have a problem with it.

Equal results aren't. Only idiots like you believe those two are the same.
equal protection is an equal result, in this case.
 
equal protection of the law, is a Constitutional issue.
You already have it.
only in right wing fantasy.

Since you provide less than equal effort, you have equal results to that low level effort. See how that works.
only in right wing fantasy; not resorting to fallacy is simply, superior workmanship.

You're inferior to me in every way.
i can't be; i don't resort to the inferiority fallacies.
 
subsidies?

yes, it does apply in this case. you are simply, clueless and Causeless, and have no standing, as a result.

equal protection of the law is in our social Contract. only infidels, protestants, and renegades have a problem with it.

only in right wing fantasy; not resorting to fallacy is simply, superior workmanship.
Their religion is socialism which worships big government and social policy. It is based on atheism and deification of man. It proceeds in almost all its manifestations from the assumption that the basic principles guiding the life of an individual and of mankind in general do not go beyond the satisfaction of material needs or primitive instincts. They have no distinction between good and evil, no morality or any other kind of value, save pleasure. Their doctrine is abolition of private property, abolition of family, abolition of religion and communality or equality. The religious nature of socialism explains its extraordinary ability to incite and inflame its adherents and inspire social movements. They practice moral relativity, indiscriminate indiscriminateness, multiculturalism, cultural marxism and normalization of deviance. Their hostility towards traditional religions is that of an animosity towards a rival religion. They can be identified by an external locus of control. They worship science but are the first to reject it.
too lazy to come up with a valid argument?
That's pretty funny coming from the guy who has made no argument. I'm pretty happy with my argument.

"Socialism intentionally denies examination.There is no formal defined dogma of socialism. Instead there is only a vague, rosy notion of something noble and good, of equality, communal ownership, and justice: the advent of these things will bring instant euphoria and a social order beyond reproach. World socialism as a whole, and all the figures associated with it, are shrouded in legend; its contradictions are forgotten or concealed; it does not respond to arguments but continually ignores them--all this stems from the mist of irrationality that surrounds socialism and from its instinctive aversion to scientific analysis. Socialism dismisses its defeats and ignores its incongruities. Socialism is a reaction: Plato as a reaction to Greek culture, and the Gnostics as a reaction to Christianity. They sought to counteract the endeavor of the human spirit to stand erect, and strove to return to the earthbound existence of the primitive states of antiquity. Socialism diametrically opposes the concepts of man held by religion. Socialism seeks to reduce human personality to its most primitive levels and to extinguish the highest, most complex, and "God-like" aspects of human individuality. And even equality itself, that powerful appeal and great promise of socialists throughout the ages, turns out to signify not equality of rights, of opportunities, and of external conditions, but equality qua identity, equality seen as the movement of variety toward uniformity." Solzhenitsyn

Their religion is socialism which worships big government and social policy. It is based on atheism and deification of man. It proceeds in almost all its manifestations from the assumption that the basic principles guiding the life of an individual and of mankind in general do not go beyond the satisfaction of material needs or primitive instincts. They have no distinction between good and evil, no morality or any other kind of value, save pleasure. Their doctrine is abolition of private property, abolition of family, abolition of religion and communality or equality. The religious nature of socialism explains its extraordinary ability to incite and inflame its adherents and inspire social movements. They practice moral relativity, indiscriminate indiscriminateness, multiculturalism, cultural marxism and normalization of deviance. Their hostility towards traditional religions is that of an animosity towards a rival religion. They can be identified by an external locus of control. They worship science but are the first to reject it.

What was your argument again?
a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage and unemployment compensation at fourteen dollars an hour, solves simple poverty in our republic.
No. It doesn't. They are still poor.
 
Why do you have to be told to help them is you claim to care so much for them?
equal protection of the law, is a Constitutional issue.

Doesn't apply to YOU being responsible for supporting YOU.
the law is the law; there is no appeal to ignorance of the law; only illegals, do that.

The law has to be applied properly. Your application of that isn't. Care to try again? You'll fail again as usual.
10USC311 is also, federal law.

Yeah, you failed again.
 
equal protection of the law, is a Constitutional issue.
You already have it.

That asshole doesn't want equal protection and opportunity. He wants equal results despite providing less than equal effort.
equal protection of the law is in our social Contract. only infidels, protestants, and renegades have a problem with it.

Equal results aren't. Only idiots like you believe those two are the same.
equal protection is an equal result, in this case.

Only a piece of shit like you would think so but still be wrong.
 
You already have it.
only in right wing fantasy.

Since you provide less than equal effort, you have equal results to that low level effort. See how that works.
only in right wing fantasy; not resorting to fallacy is simply, superior workmanship.

You're inferior to me in every way.
i can't be; i don't resort to the inferiority fallacies.

You don't have to. Your life, itself, in inferior. You were born that way.
 
subsidies?

yes, it does apply in this case. you are simply, clueless and Causeless, and have no standing, as a result.

equal protection of the law is in our social Contract. only infidels, protestants, and renegades have a problem with it.

only in right wing fantasy; not resorting to fallacy is simply, superior workmanship.
Their religion is socialism which worships big government and social policy. It is based on atheism and deification of man. It proceeds in almost all its manifestations from the assumption that the basic principles guiding the life of an individual and of mankind in general do not go beyond the satisfaction of material needs or primitive instincts. They have no distinction between good and evil, no morality or any other kind of value, save pleasure. Their doctrine is abolition of private property, abolition of family, abolition of religion and communality or equality. The religious nature of socialism explains its extraordinary ability to incite and inflame its adherents and inspire social movements. They practice moral relativity, indiscriminate indiscriminateness, multiculturalism, cultural marxism and normalization of deviance. Their hostility towards traditional religions is that of an animosity towards a rival religion. They can be identified by an external locus of control. They worship science but are the first to reject it.
too lazy to come up with a valid argument?
That's pretty funny coming from the guy who has made no argument. I'm pretty happy with my argument.

"Socialism intentionally denies examination.There is no formal defined dogma of socialism. Instead there is only a vague, rosy notion of something noble and good, of equality, communal ownership, and justice: the advent of these things will bring instant euphoria and a social order beyond reproach. World socialism as a whole, and all the figures associated with it, are shrouded in legend; its contradictions are forgotten or concealed; it does not respond to arguments but continually ignores them--all this stems from the mist of irrationality that surrounds socialism and from its instinctive aversion to scientific analysis. Socialism dismisses its defeats and ignores its incongruities. Socialism is a reaction: Plato as a reaction to Greek culture, and the Gnostics as a reaction to Christianity. They sought to counteract the endeavor of the human spirit to stand erect, and strove to return to the earthbound existence of the primitive states of antiquity. Socialism diametrically opposes the concepts of man held by religion. Socialism seeks to reduce human personality to its most primitive levels and to extinguish the highest, most complex, and "God-like" aspects of human individuality. And even equality itself, that powerful appeal and great promise of socialists throughout the ages, turns out to signify not equality of rights, of opportunities, and of external conditions, but equality qua identity, equality seen as the movement of variety toward uniformity." Solzhenitsyn

Their religion is socialism which worships big government and social policy. It is based on atheism and deification of man. It proceeds in almost all its manifestations from the assumption that the basic principles guiding the life of an individual and of mankind in general do not go beyond the satisfaction of material needs or primitive instincts. They have no distinction between good and evil, no morality or any other kind of value, save pleasure. Their doctrine is abolition of private property, abolition of family, abolition of religion and communality or equality. The religious nature of socialism explains its extraordinary ability to incite and inflame its adherents and inspire social movements. They practice moral relativity, indiscriminate indiscriminateness, multiculturalism, cultural marxism and normalization of deviance. Their hostility towards traditional religions is that of an animosity towards a rival religion. They can be identified by an external locus of control. They worship science but are the first to reject it.

What was your argument again?
a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage and unemployment compensation at fourteen dollars an hour, solves simple poverty in our republic.
No. It doesn't. They are still poor.
Your simple lack of understanding of terms, is Your problem.

Poverty and poor, and not the same thing. Poor is relative, (official) poverty is not.
 
equal protection of the law, is a Constitutional issue.

Doesn't apply to YOU being responsible for supporting YOU.
the law is the law; there is no appeal to ignorance of the law; only illegals, do that.

The law has to be applied properly. Your application of that isn't. Care to try again? You'll fail again as usual.
10USC311 is also, federal law.

Yeah, you failed again.
why be illegal to the law, kettle?
 
You already have it.

That asshole doesn't want equal protection and opportunity. He wants equal results despite providing less than equal effort.
equal protection of the law is in our social Contract. only infidels, protestants, and renegades have a problem with it.

Equal results aren't. Only idiots like you believe those two are the same.
equal protection is an equal result, in this case.

Only a piece of shit like you would think so but still be wrong.
just right wing projection instead of Any clue and Any Cause?
 
only in right wing fantasy.

Since you provide less than equal effort, you have equal results to that low level effort. See how that works.
only in right wing fantasy; not resorting to fallacy is simply, superior workmanship.

You're inferior to me in every way.
i can't be; i don't resort to the inferiority fallacies.

You don't have to. Your life, itself, in inferior. You were born that way.
those who resort to fallacy, are worse, dear.
 
Doesn't apply to YOU being responsible for supporting YOU.
the law is the law; there is no appeal to ignorance of the law; only illegals, do that.

The law has to be applied properly. Your application of that isn't. Care to try again? You'll fail again as usual.
10USC311 is also, federal law.

Yeah, you failed again.
why be illegal to the law, kettle?

Yeah, you failed another time.
 
Since you provide less than equal effort, you have equal results to that low level effort. See how that works.
only in right wing fantasy; not resorting to fallacy is simply, superior workmanship.

You're inferior to me in every way.
i can't be; i don't resort to the inferiority fallacies.

You don't have to. Your life, itself, in inferior. You were born that way.
those who resort to fallacy, are worse, dear.

It's no fallacy you're inferior to me.
 
only in right wing fantasy; not resorting to fallacy is simply, superior workmanship.

You're inferior to me in every way.
i can't be; i don't resort to the inferiority fallacies.

You don't have to. Your life, itself, in inferior. You were born that way.
those who resort to fallacy, are worse, dear.

It's no fallacy you're inferior to me.
just your inferiority talking.
 
You're inferior to me in every way.
i can't be; i don't resort to the inferiority fallacies.

You don't have to. Your life, itself, in inferior. You were born that way.
those who resort to fallacy, are worse, dear.

It's no fallacy you're inferior to me.
just your inferiority talking.

How does it feel for you to be on a lower level than the Spics?
 
i can't be; i don't resort to the inferiority fallacies.

You don't have to. Your life, itself, in inferior. You were born that way.
those who resort to fallacy, are worse, dear.

It's no fallacy you're inferior to me.
just your inferiority talking.

How does it feel for you to be on a lower level than the Spics?
doesn't matter to me; as long as you are the one who is inferior enough to resort to fallacy.
 
You don't have to. Your life, itself, in inferior. You were born that way.
those who resort to fallacy, are worse, dear.

It's no fallacy you're inferior to me.
just your inferiority talking.

How does it feel for you to be on a lower level than the Spics?
doesn't matter to me; as long as you are the one who is inferior enough to resort to fallacy.

Since you are and don't care, so much for your fallacy claim. How does it feel to be inferior to me?
 

Forum List

Back
Top