Six Reasons the Mueller Special Counsel Investigation Should be Brought to an End

[JakeStarkey]

slander and partisan shillery are the tools of the JimBowies of the board

the investigation will end when it should, with the complete exposure of Trump as the Great Colluder and Obstructer

 

[JimBowie1958]

slander and partisan shillery are the tools of the JimBowies of the board

the investigation will end when it should, with the complete exposure of Trump as the Great Colluder and Obstructer

roflmao, someone should develop an inverse index on your prognostications, Jakey-poo

 

[JimBowie1958]

LEGAL ANALYSIS: Why Mueller’s Seizure of Transition Emails Likely Violated the Law

Special Counsel Robert Mueller engaged in a mass seizure of all emails of the Trump transition team without even a warrant or a subpoena. In my opinion, a mass seizure – as is alleged here against Mueller – cannot conform to either Fourth Amendment standards or attorney-client privilege protections. The questions boils down to this: was there a reason for the individuals communicating by email, including with their lawyers, to believe their communications were private or privileged? Or, did the individuals forever waive or “implicitly consent” to any future search or seizure of their emails?

The Supreme Court in 2010 “counsels caution” before too soon defining “the existence, and extent, of privacy expectations enjoyed by employees when using employer-provided communication devices” until popular use of the technology used was better developed socially. (City of Ontario, Cal. V. Quon, 560 U.S. 746 (2010). In other words, do most people expect privacy in that use of technology to communicate, or do they assume it is equivalent to talking in an open office where anyone from the public can walk by? The court made clear a government search was not reasonable if not “justified at its inception” or “excessively intrusive” or “not reasonably related to the objectives of the search.”

Put simply, the use of a government server, like the use of an employer’s server, does not control the privilege or privacy analysis. Instead, courts typically employ a four-factor test, that tends to be very fact-intensive, email-specific, and individual-specific. ...

First, whether the government or company maintains a policy banning personal use. Second, whether the government or employer monitors the use of the email. Third, whether third parties have a right of access to the emails beyond technical audits and maintenance. Fourth, whether the government or employer notifies the individual of the limits on privacy in the emails, whether the individual was aware of those policies, the use of those policies, and the monitoring of those policies. It boils down to whether a person in the individual’s shoes would have had no reasonable expectation of privacy in their email communications.

A fifth factor is relevant in the Fourth Amendment context: whether the government gave an individual notice and the individual had knowledge of the right to refuse to give consent to the future search of their emails. Courts held individuals who agreed, as a condition of employment to “any future searches” did not waive their right against such searches because the waiver failed to give them the “right to refuse to give consent to the future search.” For the government to claim implied consent or waiver, “requires clear notice that one’s conduct may result in a search being conducted of areas which the person has been warned are subject to search,” and such notice must ensure an individual “had knowledge of the right to refuse to give consent.”

 

[JakeStarkey]

lawandcrime? You are crazy.

They were obtained legally, and the way the Trumpers are screaming, those emails are very, very important.

 

[JimBowie1958]

lawandcrime? You are crazy.

They were obtained legally, and the way the Trumpers are screaming, those emails are very, very important.

Yeah you know better than actual lawyers who specialize in 4th Amendment procedures.

And then you dont present any facts, you just pose as if you are an authority on the subject.

Dont you have a street to go play in Jakey?

 

[DrLove]

Sorry no -

 

[eddiew37]

lawandcrime? You are crazy.

They were obtained legally, and the way the Trumpers are screaming, those emails are very, very important.

Yeah you know better than actual lawyers who specialize in 4th Amendment procedures.

And then you dont present an facts, you just pose as if you are an authority on the subject.

Dont you have a street to go play in Jakey?

Mueller an expert and his 17 expert helpers know You doubt them and believe the scum trying to take him down??? SHAME on you

 

[Aba Incieni]

Lots of interesting actions breaking out all over the place. Mueller himself is being investigated for the stated bias of his team. Hillary is also under investigation for colluding with Russia and her emails. Jill Stein is under investigation for colluding with Russia.

No telling how it will all fall out.

 

[JakeStarkey]

lawandcrime? You are crazy.

They were obtained legally, and the way the Trumpers are screaming, those emails are very, very important.

Yeah you know better than actual lawyers who specialize in 4th Amendment procedures.

And then you dont present an facts, you just pose as if you are an authority on the subject.

Dont you have a street to go play in Jakey?

I know, FlakeyJim, that lawandacrime is twisting what lawyers say into meanings they don't mean.

Fact: the guy who was supposed to prevent the transfer of those emails did not do it because he died from cancer.

Fact: the completely amateur Trump transition team did not do its due diligence, and the emails transferered iaw the law.

Fact: Mueller has them legally.

Fact: that is not going to change.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Lots of interesting actions breaking out all over the place. Mueller himself is being investigated for the stated bias of his team. Hillary is also under investigation for colluding with Russia and her emails. Jill Stein is under investigation for colluding with Russia.

No telling how it will all fall out.

You better go back and check your source, just saying.

 

[Aba Incieni]

Lots of interesting actions breaking out all over the place. Mueller himself is being investigated for the stated bias of his team. Hillary is also under investigation for colluding with Russia and her emails. Jill Stein is under investigation for colluding with Russia.

No telling how it will all fall out.

You better go back and check your source, just saying.

No telling how it will all fall out.

But feel free to give us your predictions.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Yeah, it is fairly sure your hopes will be blasted, Aba.

 

[Aba Incieni]

Yeah, it is fairly sure your hopes will be blasted, Aba.

Give us your prediction about my hopes lol.

 

[eddiew37]

Yeah, it is fairly sure your hopes will be blasted, Aba.

Give us your prediction about my hopes lol.

Put hope in one hand shit in the other and see which comes true first

 

[JakeStarkey]

I have told you. The prediction is that your hopes will be blasted, Aba.

 

[Aba Incieni]

Yeah, it is fairly sure your hopes will be blasted, Aba.

Give us your prediction about my hopes lol.

Put hope in one hand shit in the other and see which comes true first

Another failed prediction. Gross, filthy, and incorrect.

Just like their candidate.

 

[Aba Incieni]

I have told you. The prediction is that your hopes will be blasted, Aba.

And I told you. Predict my hopes.

 

[JakeStarkey]

^^^ Trolling. You were answered appropriately.

 

[Aba Incieni]

^^^ Trolling. You were answered appropriately.

My hopes will be dashed, but you have no idea what they are.

lol