Should we go back to the early 19th century immigration policy?

[danielpalos]

not dumb enough for the right wing; why should we take right wingers seriously in Any serious venue.

Because they won the Presidency? (btw, I'm a Libertarian)

thank Goodness for our doctrine of separation of powers. we know right wingers have a First Amendment when it is merely and only politics.

You should seriously think of taking a break from the net, you're incoherent.

projecting much? i am not the one who has to make excuses.

What excuses have I made?

every fallacy is an Excuse.

 

[Taz]

Because they won the Presidency? (btw, I'm a Libertarian)

thank Goodness for our doctrine of separation of powers. we know right wingers have a First Amendment when it is merely and only politics.

You should seriously think of taking a break from the net, you're incoherent.

projecting much? i am not the one who has to make excuses.

What excuses have I made?

every fallacy is an Excuse.

What fallacy?

 

[danielpalos]

thank Goodness for our doctrine of separation of powers. we know right wingers have a First Amendment when it is merely and only politics.

You should seriously think of taking a break from the net, you're incoherent.

projecting much? i am not the one who has to make excuses.

What excuses have I made?

every fallacy is an Excuse.

What fallacy?

you need a valid argument or a question.

 

[Taz]

You should seriously think of taking a break from the net, you're incoherent.

projecting much? i am not the one who has to make excuses.

What excuses have I made?

every fallacy is an Excuse.

What fallacy?

you need a valid argument or a question.

Securing our borders for any reason is a valid argument.

 

[danielpalos]

projecting much? i am not the one who has to make excuses.

What excuses have I made?

every fallacy is an Excuse.

What fallacy?

you need a valid argument or a question.

Securing our borders for any reason is a valid argument.

we have a refugee problem not a common defense problem; upgrading Ellis Island is more efficient and humane.

 

[Taz]

What excuses have I made?

every fallacy is an Excuse.

What fallacy?

you need a valid argument or a question.

Securing our borders for any reason is a valid argument.

we have a refugee problem not a common defense problem; upgrading Ellis Island is more efficient and humane.

But what if we don't want any more beaners in the US? Wouldn't securing our borders make sense?

 

[danielpalos]

every fallacy is an Excuse.

What fallacy?

you need a valid argument or a question.

Securing our borders for any reason is a valid argument.

we have a refugee problem not a common defense problem; upgrading Ellis Island is more efficient and humane.

But what if we don't want any more beaners in the US? Wouldn't securing our borders make sense?

this is an Express power: To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization,

 

[Taz]

What fallacy?

you need a valid argument or a question.

Securing our borders for any reason is a valid argument.

we have a refugee problem not a common defense problem; upgrading Ellis Island is more efficient and humane.

But what if we don't want any more beaners in the US? Wouldn't securing our borders make sense?

this is an Express power: To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization,

Go back to Tacoville, you don't know what you're talking about.

 

[danielpalos]

you need a valid argument or a question.

Securing our borders for any reason is a valid argument.

we have a refugee problem not a common defense problem; upgrading Ellis Island is more efficient and humane.

But what if we don't want any more beaners in the US? Wouldn't securing our borders make sense?

this is an Express power: To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization,

Go back to Tacoville, you don't know what you're talking about.

it must take morals to resort to the fewest fallacies.

 

[Taz]

Securing our borders for any reason is a valid argument.

we have a refugee problem not a common defense problem; upgrading Ellis Island is more efficient and humane.

But what if we don't want any more beaners in the US? Wouldn't securing our borders make sense?

this is an Express power: To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization,

Go back to Tacoville, you don't know what you're talking about.

it must take morals to resort to the fewest fallacies.

So you admit that you have no morals then. Good for you. Now go pick some fruit, I’m hungry.

 

[danielpalos]

we have a refugee problem not a common defense problem; upgrading Ellis Island is more efficient and humane.

But what if we don't want any more beaners in the US? Wouldn't securing our borders make sense?

this is an Express power: To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization,

Go back to Tacoville, you don't know what you're talking about.

it must take morals to resort to the fewest fallacies.

So you admit that you have no morals then. Good for you. Now go pick some fruit, I’m hungry.

you need a superior argument.

 

[Taz]

But what if we don't want any more beaners in the US? Wouldn't securing our borders make sense?

this is an Express power: To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization,

Go back to Tacoville, you don't know what you're talking about.

it must take morals to resort to the fewest fallacies.

So you admit that you have no morals then. Good for you. Now go pick some fruit, I’m hungry.

you need a superior argument.

You mean a better argument?

 

[danielpalos]

this is an Express power: To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization,

Go back to Tacoville, you don't know what you're talking about.

it must take morals to resort to the fewest fallacies.

So you admit that you have no morals then. Good for you. Now go pick some fruit, I’m hungry.

you need a superior argument.

You mean a better argument?

you only have inferior arguments.

 

[Taz]

Go back to Tacoville, you don't know what you're talking about.

it must take morals to resort to the fewest fallacies.

So you admit that you have no morals then. Good for you. Now go pick some fruit, I’m hungry.

you need a superior argument.

You mean a better argument?

you only have inferior arguments.

You have NO arguments against securing a border, any border, of any country. I bet your family can't even speak English.

 

[danielpalos]

it must take morals to resort to the fewest fallacies.

So you admit that you have no morals then. Good for you. Now go pick some fruit, I’m hungry.

you need a superior argument.

You mean a better argument?

you only have inferior arguments.

You have NO arguments against securing a border, any border, of any country. I bet your family can't even speak English.

nobody takes right wingers seriously; they just like to tell stories in political forums.

Where is this alleged, border security clause?

We have a Commerce Clause.

 

[Flash]

I think we need to close the US to general immigration now. With over 300 million people we are full.

We should only have legal immigration to accommodate legitimate marriages. After all if a guy up to Canada and finds some cute Canadian chick he should be able to bring her back.

Maybe we could have a couple of thousand slots each year for really successful people. Individuals that would be job producers and would bring in a lot more than they would ever take out.

 

[Taz]

So you admit that you have no morals then. Good for you. Now go pick some fruit, I’m hungry.

you need a superior argument.

You mean a better argument?

you only have inferior arguments.

You have NO arguments against securing a border, any border, of any country. I bet your family can't even speak English.

nobody takes right wingers seriously; they just like to tell stories in political forums.

Where is this alleged, border security clause?

We have a Commerce Clause.

Your family isn't getting in, we have enough maids and fruit pickers.

 

[danielpalos]

I think we need to close the US to general immigration now. With over 300 million people we are full.

We should only have legal immigration to accommodate legitimate marriages. After all if a guy up to Canada and finds some cute Canadian chick he should be able to bring her back.

Maybe we could have a couple of thousand slots each year for really successful people. Individuals that would be job producers and would bring in a lot more than they would ever take out.

The entire US population fits into the State of Texas. We need new Cities in more Optimal locations.

 

[danielpalos]

you need a superior argument.

You mean a better argument?

you only have inferior arguments.

You have NO arguments against securing a border, any border, of any country. I bet your family can't even speak English.

nobody takes right wingers seriously; they just like to tell stories in political forums.

Where is this alleged, border security clause?

We have a Commerce Clause.

Your family isn't getting in, we have enough maids and fruit pickers.

in modern times? some of them are getting an education. Cheaper management not cheaper labor!

 

[pinqy]

For those who didn’t get it:

THE UNITED STATES HAD OPEN BORDERS UNTIL 1875.

The 14th amendment cannot exclude illegal aliens because there none then...it was written under the assumption of open borders.