Questioner
Senior Member
- Nov 26, 2019
- 1,593
- 84
- 50
- Banned
- #1
Scientific propaganda as used in the mass media (e.x. popsi articles as a form of advertising or the perpetuation of scientific or scientist superstitions to the masses) relies on the average 100 IQ and 6th grade reading level of its misinformed consumers, via its childish spread of scientific mythology, popular superstitions, and false historical methods, associated with either as an industry or system, primarily for the purpose of consumerist 'marketing' and the selling of frivolous and fatuous consumer products, such as cell phones, washing machines, and things of that nature.
Higher education and intellectual inquisitiveness whether historical, methododical, logical, philosophical, anything else more or less renders all of these urban legends, modern superstitions, fables, narratives, and nonsensical predictions irrelevant and not taken seriously above the 100 IQ or 6th grade reading level to begin with (many of whom uneducated 'bubbas' aren't even so much as able deconflate the actual scientific information and the reading and subject matter comprehension thereof, from the archaic, simplistic 6th grade reading level low entry level-education methodologies and rote repetition which even a 5 year old could do, devoid of any deeper level learning(s) or comphension, archaic holdovers and relics from the 19th century they are to begin with, and an outdated, 'fast food' substitute for higher level intellectual education and or learning methodologies and systems, like those of Rhodes Scholar Edward De Bono...), nor within any contemporary higher-level academic industry, being primarily driving and filled with outdated 19th century scientific information and associated axioms to begin with, many if not most of which have been debunked or rendered obsolete within more contemporary, higher level research and or developments within those and / or other fields (such as the "systems sciences" by physicist Fritjof Capra, and his other writings such as the Dao of physics).
In other nonsensical instances, the propaganda and marketing in question even relies on popular and mass education on the bare basis of their own law, medical and /or legal institutions, and so on (such as falsely conflating "medicine" as an industry and its history thereof with natural sciences, or the use of 'scientific' jargon in propaganda and advertising to sell snake oil to the uninformed and superstitious).
Banning and eliminating scientific propaganda in America, Britain, and Western Europe (or other nations as well) would be a huge progressive step forward, as it would all thinking men and women of some contemporary intelligence or affinity for reading and learning the ability to read about the natural sciences, the history of them and their founder Francis Bacon's, as well as what said inductive method is limited to in practice and scope, with the use and abuse of anti-intellectual scientific propaganda and said mass media pedagogues thereof, whether childish and intellectually vapid idiots, liars, charlatans or demagogues. like Bill Nye, Richard Dawkins or anyone else, demonstrating a bare basic lack of knowledge about the rudiments of their own institutions, whether scientific, legal, political or otherwise, whether by an archaic 19th century standard or a contemporary 21st century and Information Age one, whose career would be out of business if anyone read or wrote at above a 6th grade reading level, or if the average national IQs in America and Britain were a paltry 10 points higher.
Higher education and intellectual inquisitiveness whether historical, methododical, logical, philosophical, anything else more or less renders all of these urban legends, modern superstitions, fables, narratives, and nonsensical predictions irrelevant and not taken seriously above the 100 IQ or 6th grade reading level to begin with (many of whom uneducated 'bubbas' aren't even so much as able deconflate the actual scientific information and the reading and subject matter comprehension thereof, from the archaic, simplistic 6th grade reading level low entry level-education methodologies and rote repetition which even a 5 year old could do, devoid of any deeper level learning(s) or comphension, archaic holdovers and relics from the 19th century they are to begin with, and an outdated, 'fast food' substitute for higher level intellectual education and or learning methodologies and systems, like those of Rhodes Scholar Edward De Bono...), nor within any contemporary higher-level academic industry, being primarily driving and filled with outdated 19th century scientific information and associated axioms to begin with, many if not most of which have been debunked or rendered obsolete within more contemporary, higher level research and or developments within those and / or other fields (such as the "systems sciences" by physicist Fritjof Capra, and his other writings such as the Dao of physics).
In other nonsensical instances, the propaganda and marketing in question even relies on popular and mass education on the bare basis of their own law, medical and /or legal institutions, and so on (such as falsely conflating "medicine" as an industry and its history thereof with natural sciences, or the use of 'scientific' jargon in propaganda and advertising to sell snake oil to the uninformed and superstitious).
Banning and eliminating scientific propaganda in America, Britain, and Western Europe (or other nations as well) would be a huge progressive step forward, as it would all thinking men and women of some contemporary intelligence or affinity for reading and learning the ability to read about the natural sciences, the history of them and their founder Francis Bacon's, as well as what said inductive method is limited to in practice and scope, with the use and abuse of anti-intellectual scientific propaganda and said mass media pedagogues thereof, whether childish and intellectually vapid idiots, liars, charlatans or demagogues. like Bill Nye, Richard Dawkins or anyone else, demonstrating a bare basic lack of knowledge about the rudiments of their own institutions, whether scientific, legal, political or otherwise, whether by an archaic 19th century standard or a contemporary 21st century and Information Age one, whose career would be out of business if anyone read or wrote at above a 6th grade reading level, or if the average national IQs in America and Britain were a paltry 10 points higher.