Discussion in 'Politics' started by MarcATL, Jul 29, 2010.
Is Breitbart ultimately to blame for what happened?
Yes or no? Why/why not?
No more than the Shrub should sue Dan Rather.
She can do whatever she wants. Thats not the question.
The question is "can she win".
IMO, no, she cannot win unless new evidence comes to light.
Lets keep it on Breitbart.
Is HE the one ultimately responsible for all this mess?
No, a butterfly flapping it's wings in China is ultimately responsible. Everybody in this situation should own their choices.
She can sue whomever she wants, but she won't win. Free speech, and all that.
It's the American way...
I don't see how suing Brietbart advances Mrs. Sherrod's interests, in either her career or her lifelong commitment to racial parity. She has a new public platform from which to speak, and a sympathetic audience. It would have been better if she had simply gone forward as a person of integrity and left Brietbart in the dust, where he belongs.
The Black Racist Sherrod got hoisted by her own petard.
Then escaped........with a reward.
Now with the microscope on her, this Black Racist Sherrod turns out to be the POS she gave the impression she was.
Final result: the world knows she is a Black Racist but her fellow leftist loons think she is a fucking martyr who has the bogus right to sue.
Separate names with a comma.