Should Mueller be fired because of the compromised "INVESTIGATION" stacked with biased agents?

ColonelAngus

Diamond Member
Feb 25, 2015
52,332
52,309
3,615
Shouldn't the investigation be non-partisan?

Should one of the top investigators be texting his mistress about how much he hates Trump?

The real collusion is not Trump/Putin.

It's between the DOJ and FBI with the Hillary and Obama camps to remove Trump from office.

THAT'S THE COLLUSION.

It's BANANA REPUBLIC or SOVIET ERA TYPE SEDITION.
 
Shouldn't the investigation be non-partisan?

Should one of the top investigators be texting his mistress about how much he hates Trump?

The real collusion is not Trump/Putin.

It's between the DOJ and FBI with the Hillary and Obama camps to remove Trump from office.

THAT'S THE COLLUSION.

It's BANANA REPUBLIC or SOVIET ERA TYPE SEDITION.
I think they should shoot him.
 
Rod Rothstein appointed Mueller.

Mueller got CLINTON APOLOGISTS and DONORS on his team.

This is 3rd world type shit.

Sessions needs to step back in and start tearing shit up.

This isn't about Trump and Putin rigging the election.
 
Looks like the recent tendency in the world is: the crooks are "investigating" innocent people. Look how crooked Hillary and her Deep Sate bosses have been (with both financial and war crimes) but somehow who is under "investigation"? Trump.

Same thing with Russia and Putin. All the main enemies of Deep State are under investigations, sanctions etc. We, the people, should find the ways to turn it against those who ARE crooked somehow, don't we? Deep State is the enemy of all the people in the world (who don't actually belong to Deep State) and the enemies of our enemy are our friends.
 
Last edited:
Mueller should not be fired. The investigation should be shut down and a new investigator appointed. One not so partisan.
 
At a minimum he needs to answer the question: Why did you pick such obvious Democratic partisans for your investigative team when you could have picked anyone?


One would want AT LEAST THE APPEARANCE of an impartial investigation, surely these assholes were taught that when they got their criminal justice and law degrees.

Aren't investigations supposed to be unbiased and focused on facts, not with an END GAME OF IMPEACHMENT IN MIND?
 
The thing is Republicans hold both congress and the White House and could put an end to the "Investigation" at any time. Many republicans would love to see Trump out of the White House.
 
"Fire" is a strong word but the investigation should be completed by now and almost nobody thinks the original non criminal allegation of "collusion" was verified.
 
Fired an have a Special Counsel assigned to investigate HIM!
 
Shouldn't the investigation be non-partisan?

Should one of the top investigators be texting his mistress about how much he hates Trump?

The real collusion is not Trump/Putin.

It's between the DOJ and FBI with the Hillary and Obama camps to remove Trump from office.

THAT'S THE COLLUSION.

It's BANANA REPUBLIC or SOVIET ERA TYPE SEDITION.

:lol:

This is the most entertaining desperate attempt you guys have made so far.

Why in the fuck should "investigators" be "non-partisan"?

We have an adversarial justice system in this country. The prosecution isn't supposed to be on the defendant's side.
 
If the OP were correct, sure, but it is a lie. The OP wants the investigation to be stacked with Trumpers.
 
Not only should he be fired, he and Comey should be investigated, along with Hillary Clinton, and Barak Obama, for The Uranium One Deal, Fusion GPS Fake Russian Dossier, Unmasking and Classified Intel Leaks.

Susan Rice, Loretta Lynch and others all need to be made accountable. McCabe, Rosenstein, and Terry McCauliff too.
 
Shouldn't the investigation be non-partisan?

Should one of the top investigators be texting his mistress about how much he hates Trump?

The real collusion is not Trump/Putin.

It's between the DOJ and FBI with the Hillary and Obama camps to remove Trump from office.

THAT'S THE COLLUSION.

It's BANANA REPUBLIC or SOVIET ERA TYPE SEDITION.

:lol:

This is the most entertaining desperate attempt you guys have made so far.

Why in the fuck should "investigators" be "non-partisan"?

We have an adversarial justice system in this country. The prosecution isn't supposed to be on the defendant's side.
When there has been no Crime Committed, you have to have an unbiased investigator, otherwise, they will manufacture crimes, and cover actual crimes up, just like Comey, and Mueller have been doing.

To launch a witch hunt based on Opposition Research that was obviously fake and paid for by Obama The DNC and Hillary Clinton, who willingly colluded with RUSSIA and other Foreign Agents to do so, is absurd.

Never in History has a sitting president put a rival campaign, his entire staff and family on 24-7 surveillance in order to win an election.

Think about that for a minute, and think about how far Obama and Clinton were willing to go to win...

Is that an "American Value" we want to embrace, and then simultaneously refuse to hold anyone accountable for such acts?

It's like Nazi Germany. This is how The Nazis took over The Democratic Wiemar Republic of Germany. They slowly gained power, and then weaponized The Government against their rivals, until there was nothing left BUT THE NAZI PARTY.
 
Last edited:
Shouldn't the investigation be non-partisan?

Should one of the top investigators be texting his mistress about how much he hates Trump?

The real collusion is not Trump/Putin.

It's between the DOJ and FBI with the Hillary and Obama camps to remove Trump from office.

THAT'S THE COLLUSION.

It's BANANA REPUBLIC or SOVIET ERA TYPE SEDITION.

:lol:

This is the most entertaining desperate attempt you guys have made so far.

Why in the fuck should "investigators" be "non-partisan"?

We have an adversarial justice system in this country. The prosecution isn't supposed to be on the defendant's side.
When there has been no Crime Committed, you have to have an unbiased investigator, otherwise, they will manufacture crimes, and cover actual crimes up, just like Comey, and Mueller have been doing.

:lol:

So, you're basing your argument on the presupposition that there are no crimes to be found?

If the prosecution is "manufacturing" crimes, then I'm sure the various defendants will be able to prove so during their trials. That's how our justice system works.
 
THIS WHOLE THING IS A BULLSHIT SCAM.

https://nypost.com/2017/12/05/lates...ire-collusion-probe-look-like-a-partisan-hit/

Mueller knew this guy was in the tank for Hillary and ANTI TRUMP.

Strzok was the one who changed then-FBI chief Jim Comey’s draft language on Clinton’s use of that private server from “grossly negligent” to “extremely careless” in the final version.

Strzok also conducted the FBI interviews of Clinton and her top aides, Cheryl Mills and Huma Abedin, in the email probe.

More, he was reportedly one of the major FBI figures urging investigations on the basis of the “Steele dossier” of Russian-sourced scurrilous anti-Trump allegations, which we now know was commissioned by the Clinton campaign.
 
Shouldn't the investigation be non-partisan?

Should one of the top investigators be texting his mistress about how much he hates Trump?

The real collusion is not Trump/Putin.

It's between the DOJ and FBI with the Hillary and Obama camps to remove Trump from office.

THAT'S THE COLLUSION.

It's BANANA REPUBLIC or SOVIET ERA TYPE SEDITION.

The answer?

No, and you're mentally retarded for trying to make that argument.
 

Forum List

Back
Top