Should Bolton be allowed to testify, and why?

[lennypartiv]

The difference being Bolton agreed to testify before the senate without a subpoena.

We can no longer trust Bolton, he tried to publish a book containing classified information.

 

[BULLDOG]

The difference being Bolton agreed to testify before the senate without a subpoena.

We can no longer trust Bolton, he tried to publish a book containing classified information.

And we all know Trump's white house would never falsely make that claim just to block release of the book, don't we?

 

[lennypartiv]

We can no longer trust Bolton, he tried to publish a book containing classified information.

And we all know Trump's white house would never falsely make that claim just to block release of the book, don't we?[/QUOTE]
You have evidence of this?

 

[MAGAman]

The difference being Bolton agreed to testify before the senate without a subpoena.

We can no longer trust Bolton, he tried to publish a book containing classified information.

And we all know Trump's white house would never falsely make that claim just to block release of the book, don't we?

Its possible.

But it's a certainty that Democrats are willing to tell any lie.

 

[Ridgerunner]

Should Bolton be allowed to testify, and why?

Nan Nan sez ...

Pelosi has 'no plans right now' to seek John Bolton subpoena

 

[MAGAman]

Should Bolton be allowed to testify, and why?

Nan Nan sez ...

Pelosi has 'no plans right now' to seek John Bolton subpoena

Pelosi lied herself into a corner.

They didn't want to hear from Bolton. They just wanted to whine about a fake coverup.

 

[ColonelAngus]

Simple poll. Obviously Bolton has direct information that is relevant to the trial, but the Trump party is making great efforts to prevent that from happening. Depending on his testimony he could almost single-handedly exonerate the president. I'm particularly interested in why you think he should or shouldn't be allowed to testify.

Where is the bombshell info from the Bolton book?

 

[wamose]

WTF? What's next, bring back Avenotti and Stormy? Maybe we can revisit the dossier. We're fighting for our life in the midst of this crisis and all libs can think to do is regurgitate retarded oldies. You resisters gotta get over it and rejoin our country if you can.

 

[easyt65]

Simple poll. Obviously Bolton has direct information that is relevant to the trial, but the Trump party is making great efforts to prevent that from happening. Depending on his testimony he could almost single-handedly exonerate the president. I'm particularly interested in why you think he should or shouldn't be allowed to testify.

WHY?

Bolton is yet another distraction. The House Democrats held 2 full separate committee hearings, called numerous people to testify, wasted weeks and tax dollars to show they had ZERO crime, ZERO evidence, ZERO witnesses, and to declare they did not need any of those things to carry out the 1st Political Impeachment of a US President...

Like every other person they called to testify, Bolton - who is still butt-hurt from being fired - will give the same testimony: what he THINKS based on hearsay, 2nd and 3rd-hand info, and will give no 1st-hand account info...but would try to sell his book.

The Coup failed. The farce Impeachment failed. It was exposed for what it was and soundly rejected by the Senate...Time to move on.....

While Dems gave the faux Impeachment every bit of their attention, millions of dollars were wasted, the country was divided, House Dems completely missed the epidemic in China rising to a pandemic, and failed to protect / prepare the US for the coming emergency.

As Democrats continue to launch faux attacks / accusations against the President, as the continue to try to re-write the history of how they opposed the President's attempt to keep the US safe, and as they continue to screw Americans hurting from the COVID-19 pandemic (while Pelosi shows of her $25,000 refrigerator-freezer and 13 expensive gallons of gourmet ice cream in 1 of her several homes)...it's time for the Democrats to finally put the COUNTY / US CITIZENS above their partisan hatred and elitist political agenda / desires and start working for and uniting the country again.

 

[White 6]

Simple poll. Obviously Bolton has direct information that is relevant to the trial, but the Trump party is making great efforts to prevent that from happening. Depending on his testimony he could almost single-handedly exonerate the president. I'm particularly interested in why you think he should or shouldn't be allowed to testify.

Where is the bombshell info from the Bolton book?

Last I heard, publicatoin of book was held up by the White House, supposedly on security grounds. Article I read said this was typical of books written by white house insiders and suggested it was a known fact when taking a job there. Bolton is a special case. Would not be surprised if his book is tied up until after November.

 

[ColonelAngus]

Simple poll. Obviously Bolton has direct information that is relevant to the trial, but the Trump party is making great efforts to prevent that from happening. Depending on his testimony he could almost single-handedly exonerate the president. I'm particularly interested in why you think he should or shouldn't be allowed to testify.

Where is the bombshell info from the Bolton book?

Last I heard, publicatoin of book was held up by the White House, supposedly on security grounds. Article I read said this was typical of books written by white house insiders and suggested it was a known fact when taking a job there. Bolton is a special case. Would not be surprised if his book is tied up until after November.

Of course, anything damaging to Trump will be leaked.

 

[White 6]

Simple poll. Obviously Bolton has direct information that is relevant to the trial, but the Trump party is making great efforts to prevent that from happening. Depending on his testimony he could almost single-handedly exonerate the president. I'm particularly interested in why you think he should or shouldn't be allowed to testify.

Where is the bombshell info from the Bolton book?

Last I heard, publicatoin of book was held up by the White House, supposedly on security grounds. Article I read said this was typical of books written by white house insiders and suggested it was a known fact when taking a job there. Bolton is a special case. Would not be surprised if his book is tied up until after November.

Of course, anything damaging to Trump will be leaked.

Maybe, maybe not. National Security advisor is an unusual position with clearance way above anything I ever had in military. It gets blurry sometimes remembering where and how you know something, just to give a threat briefing to your own troops, just to avoid stepping over the lines of levels of clearence. Scrutiny of his book will be very close. You notice, you have not seen any leaks yet? Probably not because he isn't dying to let out tidbits to promote book as some many others have done. I don't like the guy and haven't since before the Bush/Cheney Iraq war, the three of them got us into. Doubt I would have actually bought his book. After election, it will not matter, except to historians.

 

[BULLDOG]

Simple poll. Obviously Bolton has direct information that is relevant to the trial, but the Trump party is making great efforts to prevent that from happening. Depending on his testimony he could almost single-handedly exonerate the president. I'm particularly interested in why you think he should or shouldn't be allowed to testify.

WHY?

Bolton is yet another distraction. The House Democrats held 2 full separate committee hearings, called numerous people to testify, wasted weeks and tax dollars to show they had ZERO crime, ZERO evidence, ZERO witnesses, and to declare they did not need any of those things to carry out the 1st Political Impeachment of a US President...

Like every other person they called to testify, Bolton - who is still butt-hurt from being fired - will give the same testimony: what he THINKS based on hearsay, 2nd and 3rd-hand info, and will give no 1st-hand account info...but would try to sell his book.

The Coup failed. The farce Impeachment failed. It was exposed for what it was and soundly rejected by the Senate...Time to move on.....

While Dems gave the faux Impeachment every bit of their attention, millions of dollars were wasted, the country was divided, House Dems completely missed the epidemic in China rising to a pandemic, and failed to protect / prepare the US for the coming emergency.

As Democrats continue to launch faux attacks / accusations against the President, as the continue to try to re-write the history of how they opposed the President's attempt to keep the US safe, and as they continue to screw Americans hurting from the COVID-19 pandemic (while Pelosi shows of her $25,000 refrigerator-freezer and 13 expensive gallons of gourmet ice cream in 1 of her several homes)...it's time for the Democrats to finally put the COUNTY / US CITIZENS above their partisan hatred and elitist political agenda / desires and start working for and uniting the country again.

The republican senate gave Trump a pass. That is no reason to believe Trump isn't guilty of every charge.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

The republican senate gave Trump a pass. That is no reason to believe Trump isn't guilty of every charge.

The House's failure to actually hold public hearings and question witnesses IS reason to believe Trump is not guilty.

Why did House Democrats fail to publicly question witnesses?

.

 

[easyt65]

The republican senate gave Trump a pass. That is no reason to believe Trump isn't guilty of every charge.

WEINSTEIN-MUELLER REPORT:
'NO ILLEGAL COLLUSION'

US IG / INVESTIGATION ON INVESTIGATION:
Constitution and Rule of Law violations by Democrats to include:
- Obstruction,
- Perjury
- Evidence Altering / Tampering
- Altering Witness Testimony
- Altering Official Documents
- FISA Court Abuses
- Illegal Spying
- Investigative / Prosecutorial Misconduct
- Leaking Classified (Espionage?)
- Sedition
- Conspiracy

SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE:
Impeachment will not proceed without 1) Undeniable evidence & 2) Bipartisanship
-- SHE HAD NEITHER

HOUSE INTEL / HUDICIARY COMMITTEE IMPEACHMENT HEARINGS:
- ZERO Crime
- ZERO Evidence
- ZERO Witnesses: Every one admitted /testified to hearsay, no 1st-hand account information
- House Intel Committee Chairman
... Obstructed Justice
... Manufactured / presented false evidence
- State Dept Rep during House Intel Committee stated President / his administration never committed a crime
... Testified Biden and his son should be investigated / called to testify
- Obama-appointed Ambassadors testified Foreign Policy under Trump BETTER than under Obama

DEMS DECLARE: NO CRIME / EVIDENCE NEEDED I A POLITICAL IMPEACHMENT

Democrats in the House 'rushed to the fastest Impeachment in US history'....the '1st Political Impeachment in US history'....based on 'the weakest case in us history'.

'IMMEDAIATE THREAT TO US' - PELOSI AND DEDMOCRATS, NOT THE P[RESIDENT
Democrats declared the president was SUCH AN IMMEDIATE THREAT TO THE NATION they rushed to Impeach....and after doing so sat on the impeachment for WEEKS attempting to exercise authority over the Senate she DID not have because it DOES NOT EXIST in an attempt to force the US Senate to adopt the House's demanded Rules for Impeachment.......

SENATE IMPEACHMENT HEARING:
The hearing started off by the US Senate asking the hand-picked House Dems if they were prepared to present the case on which they had based their justification for Impeaching the US President 0- the Democrats responded by saying, 'NO WE ARE NOT - WE NEED TO CALL MORE WITNESSES AND LOOK FOR MORE EVIDENCE'.

- The House Democrats opened up the US Senate impeachment hearing by admitting they had Impeached the US President, voted to remove him from office, but DID NOT HAVE THE EVIDENCE TO PRESENT JUSTIFYIJNG THEIR VOTE...and they never did.


...AND YOU DECLARE ALL OF THAT IS 'NO REASON TO BELIEVE TRUMP IS NOT GUILTY'?!


BWUHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.....


Dude, that isn't the 'Senate giving the President a pass' - That is history recording the CRIMINAL House Democrats' attempt to affect a political coup - after Barry and his administration' failed attempt to do so - going up in F*ING FLAMES - IN historically humbling humiliating fashion - before the entire world, recorded for all time in the history books.

 

[BULLDOG]

The republican senate gave Trump a pass. That is no reason to believe Trump isn't guilty of every charge.

The House's failure to actually hold public hearings and question witnesses IS reason to believe Trump is not guilty.

Why did House Democrats fail to publicly question witnesses?

.

They tried to question tose witnesses, but Trump blocked those witnesses from testifying. They could have impelled the testimony through the courts, but that would have taken as much as a year before they got an actual ruling.

 

[BULLDOG]

The republican senate gave Trump a pass. That is no reason to believe Trump isn't guilty of every charge.

View attachment 325799




WEINSTEIN-MUELLER REPORT:
'NO ILLEGAL COLLUSION'

US IG / INVESTIGATION ON INVESTIGATION:
Constitution and Rule of Law violations by Democrats to include:
- Obstruction,
- Perjury
- Evidence Altering / Tampering
- Altering Witness Testimony
- Altering Official Documents
- FISA Court Abuses
- Illegal Spying
- Investigative / Prosecutorial Misconduct
- Leaking Classified (Espionage?)
- Sedition
- Conspiracy

SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE:
Impeachment will not proceed without 1) Undeniable evidence & 2) Bipartisanship
-- SHE HAD NEITHER

HOUSE INTEL / HUDICIARY COMMITTEE IMPEACHMENT HEARINGS:
- ZERO Crime
- ZERO Evidence
- ZERO Witnesses: Every one admitted /testified to hearsay, no 1st-hand account information
- House Intel Committee Chairman
... Obstructed Justice
... Manufactured / presented false evidence
- State Dept Rep during House Intel Committee stated President / his administration never committed a crime
... Testified Biden and his son should be investigated / called to testify
- Obama-appointed Ambassadors testified Foreign Policy under Trump BETTER than under Obama

DEMS DECLARE: NO CRIME / EVIDENCE NEEDED I A POLITICAL IMPEACHMENT

Democrats in the House 'rushed to the fastest Impeachment in US history'....the '1st Political Impeachment in US history'....based on 'the weakest case in us history'.

'IMMEDAIATE THREAT TO US' - PELOSI AND DEDMOCRATS, NOT THE P[RESIDENT
Democrats declared the president was SUCH AN IMMEDIATE THREAT TO THE NATION they rushed to Impeach....and after doing so sat on the impeachment for WEEKS attempting to exercise authority over the Senate she DID not have because it DOES NOT EXIST in an attempt to force the US Senate to adopt the House's demanded Rules for Impeachment.......

SENATE IMPEACHMENT HEARING:
The hearing started off by the US Senate asking the hand-picked House Dems if they were prepared to present the case on which they had based their justification for Impeaching the US President 0- the Democrats responded by saying, 'NO WE ARE NOT - WE NEED TO CALL MORE WITNESSES AND LOOK FOR MORE EVIDENCE'.

- The House Democrats opened up the US Senate impeachment hearing by admitting they had Impeached the US President, voted to remove him from office, but DID NOT HAVE THE EVIDENCE TO PRESENT JUSTIFYIJNG THEIR VOTE...and they never did.


...AND YOU DECLARE ALL OF THAT IS 'NO REASON TO BELIEVE TRUMP IS NOT GUILTY'?!


BWUHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.....


.

So much bullshit. So little desire to argue each of your bullshit claims with an idiot incapable of logic or reason, such as yourself.

 

[easyt65]

o much bullshit. So little desire to argue each of your bullshit claims with an idiot incapable of logic or reason, such as yourself.

In other words you got nothing..... Thanks for playing.

 

[BULLDOG]

o much bullshit. So little desire to argue each of your bullshit claims with an idiot incapable of logic or reason, such as yourself.

In other words you got nothing..... Thanks for playing.

I would have to be almost as stupid as you to indiscriminately wade into your bullShit list. Pick one.