Political Junky
Gold Member
- May 27, 2009
- 25,793
- 3,990
- 280
Hitler was violently opposed to Marxism .. Marx was a Jew.Well I didn't think that's what she was doing, but I can't interpret the fraulein's threads....I think I generally think she's saying the exact opposite of what I initially think she's saying.
The Nazi Party is a socialist party, for the person who wanted to know how they were "liberal".
"The National Socialist program also contained a number of points that supported democracy and even called for wider democratic rights. These, like much of the program, lost their importance as the Party evolved, and were ignored by the Nazis after they rose to power."
National Socialist Program - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Like all things liberal, the so-called desire for increased rights was simply a way to pull the wool over the eyes of the public until they could effectively seize power.
Way to miss the idea that "those things were ignored after the Nazi's rose to power". They voted for people who would expand rights, but instead they got the Nazis. They were not, and are not, the same thing.
Yeah...a desire for more rights was simply a way to pull the wool over the eyes of the public until they could effectively seize power...what the hell do you think the founders were fighting for? Decreased rights? What a tool you are.
The point is, a corrupt regime who violated human rights was able to seize power using a liberal facade and appealing to people by telling them that by giving up their rights and allowing certain people to be targeted, they were really INCREASING freedom.
Typical liberal hogwash, and as usual a complete lie.