She Shudda Been President

When they can't dazzle with brilliance, they try to hit with bullshi*.


i completely understand the problem when california girls quoted post counts as logic.
It does, but you are too dull to see how it does. Read. Unfortunately, experience tells me you are too lazy to even try to understand. Your input is useless, mindless, and idiotic, as usual.

What are you talking about??? Go back and read your own input, bud. There is never anything of any substance. Just insults.
 
There's no way to say how Mrs Clinton would have performed if she had been elected President. That goes for Mr McCain as well. They weren't elected President so it's all in the realm of the hypothetical. However there's a good computer game there so I won't criticise it too much.

Comparing Mr Obama with previous Presidents is also problematic. There's no Spearman's rho that can be applied I think.

Best to judge Mr Obama by his achievements or his failures. How long has he been in office?
 
i completely understand the problem when california girls quoted post counts as logic.
It does, but you are too dull to see how it does. Read. Unfortunately, experience tells me you are too lazy to even try to understand. Your input is useless, mindless, and idiotic, as usual.

What are you talking about??? Go back and read your own input, bud. There is never anything of any substance. Just insults.
:cuckoo:
 
There's no way to say how Mrs Clinton would have performed if she had been elected President. That goes for Mr McCain as well. They weren't elected President so it's all in the realm of the hypothetical. However there's a good computer game there so I won't criticise it too much.

Comparing Mr Obama with previous Presidents is also problematic. There's no Spearman's rho that can be applied I think.

Best to judge Mr Obama by his achievements or his failures. How long has he been in office?
Right. Over nine months, officially.
 
White woman is not what dems wanted.

No, the dem followers just fell for catch phrases instead of content. ;)

Hillary is all about catch phrases. Like Barack, she hasn't really accomplished anything truly commendable, unless one approves of and supports her big government socialist loving ways.

How is it you saw content in her?

No, she hasn't accomplished a thing says the guy who sits around message boards who looks to be an extreme right wing Libertarian. :lol:
 
Last edited:
There's no way to say how Mrs Clinton would have performed if she had been elected President. That goes for Mr McCain as well. They weren't elected President so it's all in the realm of the hypothetical. However there's a good computer game there so I won't criticise it too much.

Comparing Mr Obama with previous Presidents is also problematic. There's no Spearman's rho that can be applied I think.

Best to judge Mr Obama by his achievements or his failures. How long has he been in office?

I enjoy hypothetical hyerbole. It's funny.
 
There's no way to say how Mrs Clinton would have performed if she had been elected President. That goes for Mr McCain as well. They weren't elected President so it's all in the realm of the hypothetical. However there's a good computer game there so I won't criticise it too much.

Comparing Mr Obama with previous Presidents is also problematic. There's no Spearman's rho that can be applied I think.

Best to judge Mr Obama by his achievements or his failures. How long has he been in office?

I enjoy hypothetical hyerbole. It's funny.

I just tried saying that in my best Daffy Duck voice and I must say it was damn difficult :lol:
 
There's no way to say how Mrs Clinton would have performed if she had been elected President. That goes for Mr McCain as well. They weren't elected President so it's all in the realm of the hypothetical. However there's a good computer game there so I won't criticise it too much.

Comparing Mr Obama with previous Presidents is also problematic. There's no Spearman's rho that can be applied I think.

Best to judge Mr Obama by his achievements or his failures. How long has he been in office?

I enjoy hypothetical hyerbole. It's funny.

I just tried saying that in my best Daffy Duck voice and I must say it was damn difficult :lol:
I can't rep you again! LMAO!

I suspect you'll need to clean your computer screen after the attempt, though.
 
No, the dem followers just fell for catch phrases instead of content. ;)

Hillary is all about catch phrases. Like Barack, she hasn't really accomplished anything truly commendable, unless one approves of and supports her big government socialist loving ways.

How is it you saw content in her?

No, she hasn't accomplished a thing says the guy who sits around message boards who looks to be an extreme right wing Libertarian. :lol:

You need to read more carefully. I did not say what you claim I did.

And as to left wing / right wing, you are either confused or ignorant as to what is actually left wing and right wing government. Either way, you are wrong about me.
 
Now, we need someone in the wh with a set. Bush had a set. we forgive your canadianass! you can't help it if you don't know what balls are. :eusa_pray:

Bush had nothing in the way of balls. He lied us into Iraq, he failed to go after Bin Laden, and he kissed ass in Pakistan.

Old Crock, where are you in the geothermal thread, you got nothing in the way of balls and you lied us into believing global warming, old crock failed to support old crocks post

Seriously old crock, I busted you posting pure lies in the geothermal thread


The relevance of your post in geothermal/energy in this thread is it establishes you as being a liar, further when confronted with the truth you run from your own posts.

Everyone should take a look at this liberal/democrat's post and see how the liberal/democrat must lie to further the liberal/democrat agenda.

So Old Crock, you lied and have no balls, the same thing you accuse bush of doing, why must liberal/democrats accuse others of being guilty of the same thing that the liberal/democrat is guilty of.

No balls, liar, liberal/democrat old crock
 
Clinton's Tough Talk in Pakistan Drives Home Message: It's Not a One-Way Street


Secretary of State Hillary Clinton took off the gloves and delivered a no-holds-barred message to Pakistan this week, telling the American ally that it must step up its efforts to apprehend Al Qaeda terrorists and demonstrate a real commitment to democracy.

The secretary's blunt remarks, foreign policy experts say, give Pakistan's leaders a much-needed dose of reality: their relationship with the United States is not a one-way street.

America's top diplomat struck an unusually frank tone when she said Pakistan has squandered opportunities to kill or capture Al Qaeda leaders -- including Usama Bin Laden.

"I find it hard to believe that nobody in your government knows where they are and couldn't get them if they really wanted to," she told a group of Pakistani journalists in Lahore as she wrapped up her three-day visit to Pakistan. "Maybe that's the case. Maybe they're not gettable. I don't know."



Clinton's Tough Talk in Pakistan Drives Home Message: It's Not a One-Way Street - FOXNews.com




Looks like she ain't over there kissy assey donut? :lol:

The irony is that the tough talk she gave was exactly what Bush told other countries yet he was condemed for it by the left. I actually support Hillary for doing her tough talk but can't figure out why it was wrong for Bush to do it.
 
Anyone can talk tough, she did on Iraq in 2003, but if Iraq be our guide when the going gets tough she will hide.
 
Hey--if Hillary were POTUS today--even I would be doing back flips. She's one tough cookie--& one thing for certain--she's no socialist--like you know who.

I imagine there are millions of democrats today--that wish they could change their vote--LOL
 
Jay I will say this, your a good boy and Obama should be proud, you tout the Obama line well.

Let's not talk about the current administration, lets keep making it about Bush, and maybe no one will notice how damn lost we really are.

Bravo Jay, your a good Obamamite.

Willow, your right, she should have been the one running on the DNC ticket and not Obama, at least she had some substance behind her and at least she had proven to be a fighter.

oh I doubt I would have voted for her, but you know, it wasn't ruled out. Obama wasn't even a thought, as there was nothing of substance to vote for!

Mike
 

Forum List

Back
Top