SEX ROBOT conference featuring STEVE BANNON causes him to lose more speaking gigs

[CarlinAnnArbor]

A warning from the future ... rama.

I'm waiting for a Kate Uptonbot

 

[EvilCat Breath]

For their next performance liberals will demand an end to the sale of all sex toys.

 

[bodecea]

Where the fuck do you start? Yes, we all know about AI sex and 'robots' for sex. Okay, we got. But this particular speaker at a 'sex robot' conference sat in the Oval Office as a key (and WACKO deep stater) senior White House policymaker. Wonder if he made any policy or consulted on ROBOTIC SEX?

Now remember this is Montana who is outraged. Who would have thought that MONTANA would cause a batshit winger to lose business gigs?

(First off I can't believe I'm even typing this shit. BUT he did come out of the TRUMP WH! And it might not be too surprising that this guy might need 'alternative' methods of "satisfaction"?)

Sex robot conference featuring Steve Bannon implodes as he loses multiple Montana speaking gigs

NOOR AL-SIBAI
04 DEC 2018 AT 16:31 ET

Breitbart executive Steve Bannon wearing a "Guy Fawkes/Anonymous" mask on his head. Image via Twitter.

Former White House adviser Steve Bannon was supposed to headline a sex robot conference — and has lost multiple speaking gigs since it was announced.

The Montana Kaimin, a student newspaper at the University of Montana, reported Tuesday that the Athenian Parrhesia Free Speech Forum, a debate event Bannon was supposed to participate in, was cancelled after a growing outcry from the UM community.

It was, as the Kaimin noted, the third of his appearances that has been cancelled since news broke that he was to be a keynote speaker at the Fourth Annual Congress on Love and Sex with Robots.

The sex robot conference itself was cancelled alongside the 15th International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology, the Missoula Currentreported.

Both conferences were organized by Adrian Cheok, the director of the Malaysia-based Imagineering Institute...


https://www.rawstory.com/2018/12/sex...speaking-gigs/

INCEL likes their sex robots.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Better a sex robot than an unwilling woman.

 

[fncceo]

Where the fuck do you start? Yes, we all know about AI sex and 'robots' for sex. Okay, we got. But this particular speaker at a 'sex robot' conference sat in the Oval Office as a key (and WACKO deep stater) senior White House policymaker. Wonder if he made any policy or consulted on ROBOTIC SEX?

Now remember this is Montana who is outraged. Who would have thought that MONTANA would cause a batshit winger to lose business gigs?

(First off I can't believe I'm even typing this shit. BUT he did come out of the TRUMP WH! And it might not be too surprising that this guy might need 'alternative' methods of "satisfaction"?)

Sex robot conference featuring Steve Bannon implodes as he loses multiple Montana speaking gigs

NOOR AL-SIBAI
04 DEC 2018 AT 16:31 ET

Breitbart executive Steve Bannon wearing a "Guy Fawkes/Anonymous" mask on his head. Image via Twitter.

Former White House adviser Steve Bannon was supposed to headline a sex robot conference — and has lost multiple speaking gigs since it was announced.

The Montana Kaimin, a student newspaper at the University of Montana, reported Tuesday that the Athenian Parrhesia Free Speech Forum, a debate event Bannon was supposed to participate in, was cancelled after a growing outcry from the UM community.

It was, as the Kaimin noted, the third of his appearances that has been cancelled since news broke that he was to be a keynote speaker at the Fourth Annual Congress on Love and Sex with Robots.

The sex robot conference itself was cancelled alongside the 15th International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology, the Missoula Currentreported.

Both conferences were organized by Adrian Cheok, the director of the Malaysia-based Imagineering Institute...


https://www.rawstory.com/2018/12/sex...speaking-gigs/

INCEL likes their sex robots.

And people drive cars because they can't handle a horse.

All intimate relationships come down to a equation.

Is the fornication you're getting equal to or greater than the fornication you're getting?

 

[mdk]

 

[fncceo]

I'm glad to see I'm not the only one who thinks sex with a robot is wrong.

The fact that robot technology has hit a wall in that each robot can only do one job so one would need multiple robots for different sex positions.

Plus, would the key parts be "dishwasher safe?"

True Companion and Real Doll disagree with you. There are robot brothels that would disagree with you.

Liberals surely would not oppose porn. Nor would they be so narrow minded as to oppose prostitution or sex toys. Yet they gasp and grab their pearls over a robot.

Where are these fictional "robot brothels?"

A robot brothel would be pointless. A brothel worker is already an emotionally detached sex machine what supplies gratification without the trouble of emotional maintenance.

A robot wife ... ever young, never contrary, ever appealing, never manipulative ... that is the true market for a sufficiently intelligent, sufficiently realistic robot partner.

 

[sparky]

I'm glad to see I'm not the only one who thinks sex with a robot is wrong.

can't imagine being that desperate.....

~S~

 

[fncceo]

I'm glad to see I'm not the only one who thinks sex with a robot is wrong.

can't imagine being that desperate.....

~S~

Desperation is being in a toxic relationship just to keep from being alone.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

I'm glad to see I'm not the only one who thinks sex with a robot is wrong.

The fact that robot technology has hit a wall in that each robot can only do one job so one would need multiple robots for different sex positions.

Plus, would the key parts be "dishwasher safe?"

True Companion and Real Doll disagree with you. There are robot brothels that would disagree with you.

Liberals surely would not oppose porn. Nor would they be so narrow minded as to oppose prostitution or sex toys. Yet they gasp and grab their pearls over a robot.

Where are these fictional "robot brothels?"

A robot brothel would be pointless. A brothel worker is already an emotionally detached sex machine what supplies gratification without the trouble of emotional maintenance.

A robot wife ... ever young, never contrary, ever appealing, never manipulative ... that is the true market for a sufficiently intelligent, sufficiently realistic robot partner.

Like this?

 

[sparky]

A robot wife

w/my luck.....>>>

 

[fncceo]

I'm glad to see I'm not the only one who thinks sex with a robot is wrong.

The fact that robot technology has hit a wall in that each robot can only do one job so one would need multiple robots for different sex positions.

Plus, would the key parts be "dishwasher safe?"

True Companion and Real Doll disagree with you. There are robot brothels that would disagree with you.

Liberals surely would not oppose porn. Nor would they be so narrow minded as to oppose prostitution or sex toys. Yet they gasp and grab their pearls over a robot.

Where are these fictional "robot brothels?"

A robot brothel would be pointless. A brothel worker is already an emotionally detached sex machine what supplies gratification without the trouble of emotional maintenance.

A robot wife ... ever young, never contrary, ever appealing, never manipulative ... that is the true market for a sufficiently intelligent, sufficiently realistic robot partner.

Like this?

I don't think we're anywhere near to there yet. It would require two things. First, an AI that can provide stimulating conversation and legitimate shared experiences. Second, the ability to replicate the human appearance without triggering an 'uncanny valley' reaction.

I think that the first sexual surrogates will be extensions of the gaming industry, not the robotics industry.

 

[fncceo]

A robot wife

w/my luck.....>>>

Rosie got back (plane).

 

[EvilCat Breath]

People don't like personal relationships with such robots but can't say why. It becomes even more puzzling when these folks want to make these very personal decisions for others. It's icky. You know like butt sex is icky.

 

[BULLDOG]

I'm glad to see I'm not the only one who thinks sex with a robot is wrong.

can't imagine being that desperate.....

~S~

Are you kidding? When I was a teenager, I would have had sex with a knot hole in a pine tree if I thought I could get away with it. I moved past that when I discovered real woman sex, but I don't think young guys are any different now than they were then.

 

[CarlinAnnArbor]

If I get time, I'm gonna build this. Better than the leg lamp

 

[Bob Blaylock]

Nope. Conception and gestation will merely be mechanized as well. Then there is always the ignorance of the third world.

Did you just describe traditional marriage, family, and parenthood as “the ignorance of the third world”?

 

[Bob Blaylock]

What part of the 2 sources that RAW STORY drew from do you NOT understand? A COLLEGE newspaper and a newspaper newspaper. Yepper, they even have a newspaper in Missoula, which is only about an hour from the STATE CAPITAL.

This isn't hard, so don't be stupid.

What would be the point? Any sane person knows that when they see RawStory as a source, that the story is almost certainly going to be complete bullshit. Even if they cite other sources, more credible than themselves, it is far more likely that they are flat-out lying about what those sources say, than that they are giving any kind of honest account based on those sources.

And anyone who treats anything from RawStory as credible is in no position to tell anyone else “don't be [U]stupid[/U].”

 

[CarlinAnnArbor]

Nope. Conception and gestation will merely be mechanized as well. Then there is always the ignorance of the third world.

Did you just describe traditional marriage, family, and parenthood as “the ignorance of the third world”?

Even I know, NO, she didn't.

 

[Vastator]

I'm glad to see I'm not the only one who thinks sex with a robot is wrong.

One might as well have sex with a floor lamp.

While I’m inclined to agree with you... A floor lamp doesn’t fit in the nightstand drawer as handily as a dildo, or vibrator. Odd how many see women fucking objects as normal; but only get alarmed when guys do. I think they’re both nuts...