SEX ROBOT conference featuring STEVE BANNON causes him to lose more speaking gigs

I'm glad to see I'm not the only one who thinks sex with a robot is wrong.

The fact that robot technology has hit a wall in that each robot can only do one job so one would need multiple robots for different sex positions.

Plus, would the key parts be "dishwasher safe?"
True Companion and Real Doll disagree with you. There are robot brothels that would disagree with you.

Liberals surely would not oppose porn. Nor would they be so narrow minded as to oppose prostitution or sex toys. Yet they gasp and grab their pearls over a robot.
 
I'm glad to see I'm not the only one who thinks sex with a robot is wrong.

One might as well have sex with a floor lamp.
I understand it is all very realistic but it still ain't a PERSON.

You say that like it's a good thing.

Not being a person is the entire idea.

No, it's a REPLACEMENT for a person. Big difference.

Only if you have a person to replace.

You're making me think you really DO HAVE tickets to the conference. Just a smidge too intense about it.
 
I'm glad to see I'm not the only one who thinks sex with a robot is wrong.

The fact that robot technology has hit a wall in that each robot can only do one job so one would need multiple robots for different sex positions.

Plus, would the key parts be "dishwasher safe?"
True Companion and Real Doll disagree with you. There are robot brothels that would disagree with you.

Liberals surely would not oppose porn. Nor would they be so narrow minded as to oppose prostitution or sex toys. Yet they gasp and grab their pearls over a robot.

They're not liberals. They are leftists. Can't be trusted to be tolerant and open-minded anymore. All that freedom and liberty shit is now "situational"... Depends on if it gives them a winning political advantage.

It's all about the combat and the power with them now. Only real Civil libertarians are Libertarians or a handful of hold-outs cloistered away from the political battles in a couple think tanks..Virtually none left in Congress.
 
Last edited:
Where the fuck do you start? Yes, we all know about AI sex and 'robots' for sex. Okay, we got. But this particular speaker at a 'sex robot' conference sat in the Oval Office as a key (and WACKO deep stater) senior White House policymaker. Wonder if he made any policy or consulted on ROBOTIC SEX?

Now remember this is Montana who is outraged. Who would have thought that MONTANA would cause a batshit winger to lose business gigs?

(First off I can't believe I'm even typing this shit. BUT he did come out of the TRUMP WH! And it might not be too surprising that this guy might need 'alternative' methods of "satisfaction"?)



steve-bannon.jpg



Sex robot conference featuring Steve Bannon implodes as he loses multiple Montana speaking gigs

default.gif

NOOR AL-SIBAI
04 DEC 2018 AT 16:31 ET

bannonguyfawkes-800x430.jpg
Breitbart executive Steve Bannon wearing a "Guy Fawkes/Anonymous" mask on his head. Image via Twitter.

Former White House adviser Steve Bannon was supposed to headline a sex robot conference — and has lost multiple speaking gigs since it was announced.

The Montana Kaimin, a student newspaper at the University of Montana, reported Tuesday that the Athenian Parrhesia Free Speech Forum, a debate event Bannon was supposed to participate in, was cancelled after a growing outcry from the UM community.

It was, as the Kaimin noted, the third of his appearances that has been cancelled since news broke that he was to be a keynote speaker at the Fourth Annual Congress on Love and Sex with Robots.

The sex robot conference itself was cancelled alongside the 15th International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology, the Missoula Currentreported.

Both conferences were organized by Adrian Cheok, the director of the Malaysia-based Imagineering Institute...


https://www.rawstory.com/2018/12/sex...speaking-gigs/

So now the center of the left is all prudish and shit? Gawd, you're conveniently offended aintcha?

Pushing 39 flavors of gender, but COMPLETELY apeshit about a sex with technology conference.. What a jerk.

Well, I guess you're gonna have to tell me WHAT 39 flavors of gender, I'm pushing. I was only aware of 2. Born with, making a choice, or confused between--there are still only 2 that I'm aware of.

Now as for your take on the POINT OF THE THREAD. I'm not apeshit, I'm LMAO. Steve Bannon, a personally repugnant human, should be a LAUGHABLE character, another freak in this circus. But he has Trump's private phone number and vice versa. The fact that he was to be a speaker at a SEXUAL ROBOTIC CONFERENCE is just another side show but from the same circus.

gettyimages-632408944.jpg
 
Last edited:
John Boehner is a Director for a Mega Pot consortium. Steve Bannon is talking at Sex Robot conferences and CenterLeftFl is policing your bedroom.. :ack-1:

What a strange turn of events.
 
Well, I guess you're gonna have to tell me WHAT 39 flavors of gender, I'm pushing. I was only aware of 2. Born with or making a choice, there are still only 2 that I'm aware of.

That's because you're dishonest as well. You know damn well which tribe is pushing that nonsense towards political recognition. Ask any college freshman about their orientation on addressing people properly. Situational ignorance if you want to exact.
 
There was a time when riding a horse was as natural as breathing. The concept of trading in a horse for an automaton horse was ridiculous.

When the convenience of a car exceeded that of of a horse, it became the most natural thing in the world. There are still people who ride horses, but you bet they also own a car.

The state of AI and the uncanny valley make the idea of a robot relationship seem ridiculous, but who know what the future holds?

We may see human relationships go the way of the horse.
 
I'm glad to see I'm not the only one who thinks sex with a robot is wrong.

One might as well have sex with a floor lamp.
I understand it is all very realistic but it still ain't a PERSON.

You say that like it's a good thing.

Not being a person is the entire idea.

No, it's a REPLACEMENT for a person. Big difference.

Only if you have a person to replace.

That's true.
 
There was a time when riding a horse was as natural as breathing. The concept of trading in a horse for an automaton horse was ridiculous.

When the convenience of a car exceeded that of of a horse, it became the most natural thing in the world. There are still people who ride horses, but you bet they also own a car.

The state of AI and the uncanny valley make the idea of a robot relationship seem ridiculous, but who know what the future holds?

We may see human relationships go the way of the horse.
Unless you can get one of them pregnant, you'll find out in very short order. Extinction will be measured in decades not millennia.
 
Last edited:
There was a time when riding a horse was as natural as breathing. The concept of trading in a horse for an automaton horse was ridiculous.

When the convenience of a car exceeded that of of a horse, it became the most natural thing in the world. There are still people who ride horses, but you bet they also own a car.

The state of AI and the uncanny valley make the idea of a robot relationship seem ridiculous, but who know what the future holds?

We may see human relationships go the way of the horse.
Unless you can get one of them pregnant, you'll find out in very short order. Extinction will be measured in decades not millennia.
Nope. Conception and gestation will merely be mechanized as well. Then there is always the ignorance of the third world.
 
There was a time when riding a horse was as natural as breathing. The concept of trading in a horse for an automaton horse was ridiculous.

When the convenience of a car exceeded that of of a horse, it became the most natural thing in the world. There are still people who ride horses, but you bet they also own a car.

The state of AI and the uncanny valley make the idea of a robot relationship seem ridiculous, but who know what the future holds?

We may see human relationships go the way of the horse.
Unless you can get one of them pregnant, you'll find out in very short order. Extinction will be measured in decades not millennia.
Nope. Conception and gestation will merely be mechanized as well. Then there is always the ignorance of the third world.

Not in time for the ALREADY HERE sexual surrogates you have to plug in.
 
Nope. Conception and gestation will merely be mechanized as well. Then there is always the ignorance of the third world.

And THAT is the problem. These people WILL breed us out of existence, and THAT is the stated plan. I don't think they're smart enough to figure out what will actually happen when we're gone. It will be endless cycles of famine and disease. They won't have the brains to recover from it so that will be THEIR future.
 
I'm glad to see I'm not the only one who thinks sex with a robot is wrong.

The fact that robot technology has hit a wall in that each robot can only do one job so one would need multiple robots for different sex positions.

Plus, would the key parts be "dishwasher safe?"
True Companion and Real Doll disagree with you. There are robot brothels that would disagree with you.

Liberals surely would not oppose porn. Nor would they be so narrow minded as to oppose prostitution or sex toys. Yet they gasp and grab their pearls over a robot.

Where are these fictional "robot brothels?"
 

Forum List

Back
Top