- Dec 6, 2009
- 77,845
- 4,176
- 1,815
Like the false premise that the Mandate was a state.Now, dear. All of the above, on multiple occasions, in excruciating detail has been delineated for you. You make the same fallacious comments and sputter the same tired slogans.So you post more meaningless clutter.You should require the prayer leader at your madrassah to write a strongly worded email in protest. Have it written in all caps.Kontorovich is an overpaid political hack. He bases his arguments on false premise.OK, but Kontorovich has.
Shirley, you can cut and paste a press TV produced YouTube video to refute the paper.
While you're scouring YouTube, bear in mind that the work by Mr. Kontorovich is an opinion that is subject to peer review. Outside of islamic fear societies, there is this thing called academic freedom where published works aren't subject to islamo-goons / islamo-mobs deciding over a bloody corpses what is allowed to be published outside of the egregious sin of hurting Moslems feelings™
He says that a successor state acquires the borders of the predecessor state. Of course this part is true. He says that the Mandate was the predecessor state and they left all of Palestine to the Jews as it was inside the Mandate's borders. Therefore all of Palestine is Israel. There are no occupied territories. Therefore there are no illegal settlements.
His false premise is that the Mandate was a predecessor state. It was not. It could not leave any territory to anyone because it had no territory to give. It had no authority over any territory.
It has become known as The Tinmore Vortex.