SERIOUS question for all Trump acolytes on this forum....

[jknowgood]

Was Trump charged with something?

MORON......Under DOJ "guidelines" a president CANNOT be charged with anything. He is BEYOND the LAW.

If you read the report even an idiot like you would understand that Mueller is calling for Trump to be charged AFTER he leaves office.

He found nothing dumbass.

 

[playtime]

WHERE......for sanity sake......do you Trump acolytes that Trump was EXONERATED by the Mueller report???

Seriously, you can say that Barr "exonerated" Trump

You can say that Trump, exonerated Trump
You can say that KellyAnn has exonerated Trump
You can say that Hannity has exonerated Trump

BUT, when you state that Mueller has exonerated Trump you are either a fucking idiot.....You did not read the redacted report, or you're beyond sanity in discussing this issue...

READ THE DAMN REPORT and you CANNOT conclude that Mueller "exonerated" Trump.......

READ, COMPREHEND and LEARN, for God's sake.

Was Trump charged with something?

following DOJ policy, mueller refrained & left it up to congress re: obstruction charges - but he did say that if not for DOJ policy, he would have brought forth charges. as far as collusion, he said too much 'documentary' evidence was destroyed & what was left, wasn't enough to prosecute or recommend congress take it up.

 

[Mike473]

Was Trump charged with something?

MORON......Under DOJ "guidelines" a president CANNOT be charged with anything. He is BEYOND the LAW.

If you read the report even an idiot like you would understand that Mueller is calling for Trump to be charged AFTER he leaves office.

Honestly, you have to let this go. It is over. I still cant get over Clinton getting away with deleting her e-mails under subpoena, destroying her devices with a hammer, setting up secret servers and then using bleachbit. But, at least I understand that people at her level never go down for stuff like this. Trump wont either.

 

[playtime]

This report was completed without the possibility of cross examination. It is a prosecutor making his best case to a jury without the defense being able to present their case[/QUOTE]


Dimwit.........Trump REFUSED to stand before a Grand Jury...under oath....to be questioned.......

Trump's "defense" was to NOT show up....

Clinton DID show up before a Grand Jury.

There is no cross examination of witnesses in a grand jury proceeding.

there was no cross examination of trump either by mueller. the whitehouse flat out lied when they said there was complete cooperation.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Let's be honest, not a single one of your Trump sheep have read the report...just admit it

 

[ptbw forever]

Trump: 'Don’t believe what you’re reading or seeing'

Giuliani: 'Truth isn't truth'

Kellyanne Conway : "You're saying it's a falsehood, and they're saying Sean Spicer, our press secretary, gave alternative facts to that."

that's the world they live in.

Only Democrats are dumb enough to think those statements mean anything.

 

[nat4900]

He found nothing dumbass.

Go back to bed..........You're beyond sanity......LOL

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Trump: 'Don’t believe what you’re reading or seeing'

Giuliani: 'Truth isn't truth'

Kellyanne Conway : "You're saying it's a falsehood, and they're saying Sean Spicer, our press secretary, gave alternative facts to that."

that's the world they live in.

Only Democrats are dumb enough to think those statements mean anything.

They do mean something, it means they will tell the public whatever they want to irregardless of the validity of the statements. They openly admit they do not care if what they say is true or based upon facts, or anything at all.

and you cheer for them and ask to be lied to some more.

 

[nat4900]

Let's be honest, not a single one of your Trump sheep have read the report...just admit it

Hannity has been entrusted to read and interpret the report for ALL Trump cult members.....they're a bit too busy drinking kool-aid.

 

[Mac1958]

Standard partisan squabbling and spinning aside, there's nothing in the report that's surprising.

This is the way we figured he operates. He asks people to do things he knows aren't right, he asks people to do things he doesn't understand are wrong (based on his abject ignorance or complete lack of appreciation for the office), he demands simplistic loyalty, he drives people nuts, people have to tell him no, like he's a child.

The wingers can play with the chew toy all they want and get whatever they want out of it. But we all know this is Trump.
.

 

[playtime]

Trump: 'Don’t believe what you’re reading or seeing'

Giuliani: 'Truth isn't truth'

Kellyanne Conway : "You're saying it's a falsehood, and they're saying Sean Spicer, our press secretary, gave alternative facts to that."

that's the world they live in.

Only Democrats are dumb enough to think those statements mean anything.

apparently they mean everything to the liars in trump world ESPECIALLY donny - who has told close to 10K lies since he was installed & couldn't tell the truth even if it could help him.

 

[Hellokitty]

WHERE......for sanity sake......do you Trump acolytes that Trump was EXONERATED by the Mueller report???

Seriously, you can say that Barr "exonerated" Trump

You can say that Trump, exonerated Trump
You can say that KellyAnn has exonerated Trump
You can say that Hannity has exonerated Trump

BUT, when you state that Mueller has exonerated Trump you are either a fucking idiot.....You did not read the redacted report, or you're beyond sanity in discussing this issue...

READ THE DAMN REPORT and you CANNOT conclude that Mueller "exonerated" Trump.......

READ, COMPREHEND and LEARN, for God's sake.

 

[nat4900]

There is no cross examination of witnesses in a grand jury proceeding.

MORON......FIRST, there is cross-examination of a witness by FBI and special prosecutor questioners...

Second, there IS cross-examination of witnesses in a grand jury setting.....IT IS THE FUCKING JURORS WHO CROSS-EXAMINE....

Go back to your GED classes.

 

[jknowgood]

WHERE......for sanity sake......do you Trump acolytes that Trump was EXONERATED by the Mueller report???

Seriously, you can say that Barr "exonerated" Trump

You can say that Trump, exonerated Trump
You can say that KellyAnn has exonerated Trump
You can say that Hannity has exonerated Trump

BUT, when you state that Mueller has exonerated Trump you are either a fucking idiot.....You did not read the redacted report, or you're beyond sanity in discussing this issue...

READ THE DAMN REPORT and you CANNOT conclude that Mueller "exonerated" Trump.......

READ, COMPREHEND and LEARN, for God's sake.

Was Trump charged with something?

following DOJ policy, mueller refrained & left it up to congress re: obstruction charges - but he did say that if not for DOJ policy, he would have brought forth charges. as far as collusion, he said too much 'documentary' evidence was destroyed & what was left, wasn't enough to prosecute or recommend congress take it up.

Unlike Hillary, Trump handed over everything Muller asked for. There is no evidence against Trump. If there was anything Muller would've released it. Trump will be YOUR president till 2024. So put your big boy pants on and shut up.

 

[playtime]

Trump: 'Don’t believe what you’re reading or seeing'

Giuliani: 'Truth isn't truth'

Kellyanne Conway : "You're saying it's a falsehood, and they're saying Sean Spicer, our press secretary, gave alternative facts to that."

that's the world they live in.

Only Democrats are dumb enough to think those statements mean anything.

 

[nat4900]

The wingers can play with the chew toy all they want and get whatever they want out of it. But we all know this is Trump.

ERGO......would you then OPENLY ADMIT that the orange clown is NOT fir to sit in the oval office???

 

[jknowgood]

He found nothing dumbass.

Go back to bed..........You're beyond sanity......LOL

 

[Hale]

You're trying to reverse rule of law. Mueller found no guilt, that is called "innocent".

Saying "There might be guilt somewhere, but we can't find it" is just stupid weasel words.

 

[Hale]

And here's your ribbon, nat4900

 

[Mike473]

This report was completed without the possibility of cross examination. It is a prosecutor making his best case to a jury without the defense being able to present their case[/QUOTE]


Dimwit.........Trump REFUSED to stand before a Grand Jury...under oath....to be questioned.......

Trump's "defense" was to NOT show up....

Clinton DID show up before a Grand Jury.

There is no cross examination of witnesses in a grand jury proceeding.

there was no cross examination of trump either by mueller. the whitehouse flat out lied when they said there was complete cooperation.

Did Hillary Clinton stand before a grand jury against charges of obstruction for deleting all the e-mails under subpoena, bleachbit use on the illegal server, or smashing all her devices with a hammer? I seem to remember the FBI questioning her without her being placed under oath and with fact witnesses in the room, some who were given immunity. I could be wrong.

As for Trump, he had no need to testify. Unlike Bill Clinton, he did not commit any crimes and was not going to be set up for some trap. Which, by the way, they are trying to do with the obstruction arguments anyway.