Senate border deal would allow 5,000 illegal immigrants a day

This is what Democrats, and some RINOs mean by immigration reform. Just keep shoveling the turd world in.

Dumb ass Republicans playing with evil Democrats. No need, no need.


Conservative activists are recoiling as details leak from the immigration deal being negotiated in the Senate suggesting illegal border crossers will be immediately eligible for work permits and the government will allow up to 5,000 illegal immigrants a day before new expulsion powers kick in.
Talks have been going on for weeks and the plans have been tightly guarded by the negotiators, but Rosemary Jenks, government relations director at the Immigration Accountability Project, said she’s been briefed by multiple people familiar with the negotiations and has been sharing details online.
She said the current framework includes a right to government-funded lawyers for illegal immigrant children struggling through the immigration courts, and would also expand legal immigration, both priorities for President Biden. In exchange, Republicans have won new limits on attempts to claim asylum and expanded speedy deportation powers, but no significant new restrictions on Homeland Security’s power to “parole” illegal immigrants directly into the U.S.
Ms. Jenks said the deal, based on those outlines, will do little to derail the unprecedented number of illegal immigrants pouring in.
“I think we’d be lucky if it didn’t increase,” she told The Washington Times. “There’s nothing in this that I have seen or been told about that stops catch-and-release.”
Her version of the bill has scorched through conservative circles and activists are now rallying to demand the GOP back out of the talks. Their chief target is Sen. James Lankford, the Oklahoma lawmaker who is serving as Republicans’ lead negotiator.
...



5,000 a day for illegals?
Oh, that is a totally different Magilla.



Obama far west color LR cens.jpg
 
What do deportations have to do with total immigration?

Immigration? I'm talking about illegal aliens flooding across the border.

Good catch.

Poor choice of words on my part.

The graph is based on unauthorized immigration.

I dug up the actual link that reflects the graph I posted earlier.

FYI, if you click on the graph in the link it will open up to show a greater time period.


Yet securing the border is very difficult when they know their are jobs available, they can simply claim asylum

Yeah, we need to turn down ridiculous asylum claims. Shouldn't take more than a minute or two.

Well the required legislation would take more then a minute or two but yeah, I agree; that is what they should do.

or they can get VISAs in a program with little enforcement.

What programs are like that?
The VISA program is like that.

That is why nearly half of illegals arrived legally and overstayed VISAS. (Just for transparency, this statement is based on aged data but certainly to this day a large portion of illegals still arrived legally.)

Did you know the fed is even aware of these illegals working? They flag the fake SS numbers but just keep collecting the money. Then when the worker is old and done working the SS office says to bad so sad no SS for you, and keep the money? Check the link below amd tell me it doesn't piss you off.


This is fine in my opinion but the point is we know where many are...we have for years but we do nothing because lobbyists own politicians from the president on down.

In my opinion, the only reason Trump is touting a wall is because lobbyists who benefit from illegal labor know it won't be effective enough to matter.
 
From your own link.

According to CBS News Chicago, at a recent community forum on the West Side held by Alderman Chris Taliaferro, one concerned resident said, “We’re not anti-migrants, but it should not be on our backs.”

I agree. If Republican border governors are going to ship migrants to Chicago there should be federal funds diverted from border security in their states to help pay for it.
 
From your own link.

According to CBS News Chicago, at a recent community forum on the West Side held by Alderman Chris Taliaferro, one concerned resident said, “We’re not anti-migrants, but it should not be on our backs.”

I agree. If Republican border governors are going to ship migrants to Chicago there should be federal funds diverted from border security in their states to help pay for it.
Federal (taxpayer) money should not be used allowing Dems / Socialists to break tbe law by importing illegals.

Aren't Republican border governors assisting sanctuary cities by sending them sanctuary'ees?
 
From your own link.

According to CBS News Chicago, at a recent community forum on the West Side held by Alderman Chris Taliaferro, one concerned resident said, “We’re not anti-migrants, but it should not be on our backs.”

I agree. If Republican border governors are going to ship migrants to Chicago there should be federal funds diverted from border security in their states to help pay for it.
 

I don't get my thoughts from stupid youtube videos. Should Chicago residents be pissed? Sure. But Democrats need to do a better job directing that anger at Republicans who don't want to fund any border security or increase funding to process and house migrants. They just want to cause chaos.
 
I don't get my thoughts from stupid youtube videos. Should Chicago residents be pissed? Sure. But Democrats need to do a better job directing that anger at Republicans who don't want to fund any border security or increase funding to process and house migrants. They just want to cause chaos.

Why should anyone fund Dem / Marxist border security that continues the mass importation of illegals?
 
Why should anyone fund Dem / Marxist border security that continues the mass importation of illegals?
Well for one it's the law. People are allowed to come here to seek asylum which most showing people showing up at the border are. Secondly, you don't have the votes to change that law so the best you have is a compromise on increased border funding and increased funding for housing and courts to be able to process these asylum claims quicker. Or Republicans can continue to do what they are doing now which is to sew chaos which only serves to allow more people to sneak in or for asylum seekers to remain here longer waiting for their cases to be heard which honestly is fine by me because the longer they're here and the more chaos Republicans sew the more babies that are born here as full American citizens and the more your demographic demise is hastened.
 
I don't get my thoughts from stupid youtube videos. Should Chicago residents be pissed? Sure. But Democrats need to do a better job directing that anger at Republicans who don't want to fund any border security or increase funding to process and house migrants. They just want to cause chaos.
The problem is that every migrants costs money for some American taxpayer somewhere

If not black people in chicago then a white person in atlanta or an asian in houston will have to pay for them

You just want the spread the pain rather than solve the problem

America does not need these migrants, period.
 
Well for one it's the law. People are allowed to come here to seek asylum which most showing people showing up at the border are. Secondly, you don't have the votes to change that law so the best you have is a compromise on increased border funding and increased funding for housing and courts to be able to process these asylum claims quicker. Or Republicans can continue to do what they are doing now which is to sew chaos which only serves to allow more people to sneak in or for asylum seekers to remain here longer waiting for their cases to be heard which honestly is fine by me because the longer they're here and the more chaos Republicans sew the more babies that are born here as full American citizens and the more your demographic demise is hastened.

You have so much of that backwards. Biden is importing third worlders as future voters. Asylum is a fraud as Mayorkas is ignoring current law

Border funding which is a part of
extortion for defending Ukraine's borders is nothing more than an attempt to import more Dem / Socialist voters at a faster pace.

In terms of demographics, you apparently missed the screeching from blacks in inner cities who feel they are being pushed aside as the class of illegals is now the privileged group.
 
The problem is that every migrants costs money for some American taxpayer somewhere

If not black people in chicago then a white person in atlanta or an asian in houston will have to pay for them
That seems like a complaint about tax structure. I think we should tax businesses and the wealthy more and the poor and the working class less.
You just want the spread the pain rather than solve the problem
Funding more border security and processing centers on the backs of the wealthy would solve the problem.
America does not need these migrants, period.
It's birth rates say otherwise.
 

Forum List

Back
Top