Second hottest August in recorded history based on Copernicus data

[Old Rocks]

The ‘St. Roch's’ first trip (from West to East) took about 28 months (850 days), starting from Vancouver, B.C. on June 23 1940 and ending at Halifax, N.S. on Oct 11 1942.

The 1940 season was bad, with lots of heavy ice, and they could sometimes see no water : often only small pools with no visible outlet. At times, they used “black gunpowder” (1) to crack floes. On Sep 26 1940 they were frozen in at Walker Bay on the East coast of Victoria Island, and wintered there until July 31 1941.

The Summer of 1941 was also bad with lots of ice, and they didn’t get very far, due to “...ice and violent snow squalls” (2), and a lot of solid ice, so that by Sep 11 they were jammed in by ice close to the beach at Pasley Bay, Boothia Peninsula. In fact, the boat almost capsized within the tight-packed ice :“...nearly lost the ship” (2), according to Larsen. They wintered there from Sep 15 1941 to Aug 04 1942.
..................................................................................................................................................

2007 - Sailing-vessel ‘Cloud Nine’, a 17m Bowman ketch - The first American sailing boat to complete the passage from East to West, containing possibly the oldest man to do the journey ! Completed the journey in 45 days – “There was hardly any ice”, he told the Wall Street Journal.

2007 - James Allison,sailing in the 14.5m fibreglass Bowman 'Luck Dragon', said he felt a bit of a fraud after completing the trip because there wasn’t any ice.

2007 - A lightweight 7.5m x 5m catamaran, the Babouche, successfully navigated the full length of the 5,150km (3,200-mile) waterway. “This is the first time the journey has been completed entirely by sail... Not so long ago, ...this journey would have been impossible because of the ice”.

https://static.skepticalscience.com/images/Transits.png



Flap yap all you want, the graph says it all.

 

[ScienceRocks]

Added trend

Based on this dataset 2017 was only slightly lower then 2017. This will increase the chances of us seeing the second hottest year ever.

What's funny is spencer is a skeptic and even he can't hide the warming!

 

[skookerasbil]

lol......ask any person alive in the northeast if they thought this August was even warm, much less hot!! Oly the bozo alarmists think perceptions of this stuff is immaterial.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Climate "science" is a joke, it has nothing in common with real science. There's no stated theory, no rigerous experiments; instead it's altered data fed into flawed models and absolutely insane, Hari Krishna bleating about "consensus"

Riiiiiiight... all of these educated people dedicating their lives to this field are all liars or incompetent, and a guy like you who knows less than nothing about the topic has managed to figure them all out.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

lol......ask any person alive in the northeast if they thought this August was even warm, much less hot!! Oly the bozo alarmists think perceptions of this stuff is immaterial.

Well, that would be a stupid thing to do. The correct thing to do would be to consult the data, not ask people what they "feel".

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

You're a geologist, eh? Cool. That must be quite an internal struggle for you, given that all of the world's major geological societies endorse the consensus on climate change. You must be a hoot at their cocktail parties.

Ahhh, yet another appeal to authority logical fallacy. The reality is the leadership of those groups is political, and they are populated by the same sorts of people who declared Alfred Wegener and his theory of plate tectonics to be wrong.

That's the thing about groups....they go for the easy money, and believe me, there is nothing easier than prostituting yourself for cold, hard, cash. Leaves a bad taste in the mouth of those with ethics though. That's why we don't do it, and the overwhelming majority of geologists do not agree with the position the leadership has taken. Because we aren't political.

Go figure.

I'm pretty sure you don't understand what the word "fallacy" means. and, predictably, everyone who does not agree with you is either incompetent or lying. You've really rigged the game for yourself... heck, with that kind of protective bubble, you can pretty much declare ANYTHING as true and fool yourself into believing it.


so, let's review:

Self-proclaimed geologist who has demonstrated little to no knowledge of this topic and has said things about it which are incorrect is on the right side of history of science, and all of the world's major geological societies are on the wrong side of history. Seems legit!


Oh, and let's not leave out the most important part: the reason an expert such as yourself is not producing science which undermines the accepted theories is because, well, you just don't feel like it. Oh man, it's hard even to type that without being embarrassed...mostly for you...

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Climate "science" is a joke, it has nothing in common with real science. There's no stated theory, no rigerous experiments; instead it's altered data fed into flawed models and absolutely insane, Hari Krishna bleating about "consensus"

Riiiiiiight... all of these educated people dedicating their lives to this field are all liars or incompetent, and a guy like you who knows less than nothing about the topic has managed to figure them all out.

Here are your "Educated people" This is not a fucking joke or a photoshop, these are climate "Scientists"

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Climate "science" is a joke, it has nothing in common with real science. There's no stated theory, no rigerous experiments; instead it's altered data fed into flawed models and absolutely insane, Hari Krishna bleating about "consensus"

Riiiiiiight... all of these educated people dedicating their lives to this field are all liars or incompetent, and a guy like you who knows less than nothing about the topic has managed to figure them all out.

Here are your "Educated people" This is not a fucking joke or a photoshop, these are climate "Scientists"

Where are the other 100s of 1000s of climate scientists? And why are you showing me a picture of a prop, instead of speaking to published science? What so you think i am.... 5 years old? Embarrassing...

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Climate "science" is a joke, it has nothing in common with real science. There's no stated theory, no rigerous experiments; instead it's altered data fed into flawed models and absolutely insane, Hari Krishna bleating about "consensus"

Riiiiiiight... all of these educated people dedicating their lives to this field are all liars or incompetent, and a guy like you who knows less than nothing about the topic has managed to figure them all out.

Here are your "Educated people" This is not a fucking joke or a photoshop, these are climate "Scientists"

Where are the other 100s of 1000s of climate scientists? And why are you showing me a picture of a prop, instead of speaking to published science? What so you think i am.... 5 years old? Embarrassing...

Those are the Ruth and Gehrig of Climate Science, they dragged down MIT as a serious organization

"Ronald Prinn, director of MIT's Center for Global Change Science, and his group have revised their model that shows how much hotter the Earth's climate will get in this century without substantial policy change. Standing with the group's "roulette wheel" are, from left to right, Mort Webster, professor in the Engineering Systems Division; Adam Schlosser, principal research scientist at the Center for Global Change Science; Prinn, the TEPCO Professor of Atmospheric Chemistry; and Sergey Paltsev, principal research scientist, MIT Energy Initiative"

Climate change odds much worse than thought

 

[skookerasbil]

lol......ask any person alive in the northeast if they thought this August was even warm, much less hot!! Oly the bozo alarmists think perceptions of this stuff is immaterial.

Well, that would be a stupid thing to do. The correct thing to do would be to consult the data, not ask people what they "feel".

But thats not the real world s0n which is exactly my whole point. Nobody cares about the data........less than 1% of people are home tonight mulling through climate data. Why? Because they have about 4 billion better things to do. But they certainly go into wtf mode when they spend their summer freezing their asses off after having experienced years and years of routine 90's and several days of 100's which haven't been seen in the northeast in years. Its sure as shit does have huge impacts on tens of millions of people when shit isn't squaring with the msm presentation that the world is melting. Again.........that's how it works in the real world and all the evidence of alarmists losing huge on the government policy front ( all over the world btw ) is the kick to the nut sacks.

Shit like the Paris Treaty...........a goof. Government's aren't stoopid.......China increasing its coal production 50% higher by 2040. Oh.......and Europe is going to smash its voters with mega-high electricity bills due to renewable energy curbing CO2??!

I don't fucking think so...........because in the real world, none of the fantasy shit from green assholes ever materializes. It cant.....because costs matter. Except to bubble dwelling socialist nutters who show up every day with their bat and ball science idea's and end up sitting in the dugout for 9 innings.

 

[westwall]

You're a geologist, eh? Cool. That must be quite an internal struggle for you, given that all of the world's major geological societies endorse the consensus on climate change. You must be a hoot at their cocktail parties.

Ahhh, yet another appeal to authority logical fallacy. The reality is the leadership of those groups is political, and they are populated by the same sorts of people who declared Alfred Wegener and his theory of plate tectonics to be wrong.

That's the thing about groups....they go for the easy money, and believe me, there is nothing easier than prostituting yourself for cold, hard, cash. Leaves a bad taste in the mouth of those with ethics though. That's why we don't do it, and the overwhelming majority of geologists do not agree with the position the leadership has taken. Because we aren't political.

Go figure.

I'm pretty sure you don't understand what the word "fallacy" means. and, predictably, everyone who does not agree with you is either incompetent or lying. You've really rigged the game for yourself... heck, with that kind of protective bubble, you can pretty much declare ANYTHING as true and fool yourself into believing it.


so, let's review:

Self-proclaimed geologist who has demonstrated little to no knowledge of this topic and has said things about it which are incorrect is on the right side of history of science, and all of the world's major geological societies are on the wrong side of history. Seems legit!


Oh, and let's not leave out the most important part: the reason an expert such as yourself is not producing science which undermines the accepted theories is because, well, you just don't feel like it. Oh man, it's hard even to type that without being embarrassed...mostly for you...

Oh, i understand what the word means quite well. I fear it is you who do not. One thing that ALL AGW supporters seem to have in common is a complete lack of understanding of what the Scientific Method is, and why it was developed over centuries. Here is one of the smartest men I have ever known describing it for you. And it refers specifically to your constant Appeals to Authority.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Climate "science" is a joke, it has nothing in common with real science. There's no stated theory, no rigerous experiments; instead it's altered data fed into flawed models and absolutely insane, Hari Krishna bleating about "consensus"

Riiiiiiight... all of these educated people dedicating their lives to this field are all liars or incompetent, and a guy like you who knows less than nothing about the topic has managed to figure them all out.

I know!
If Michael Mann was a liar, he would never have won the Nobel Prize, right?

 

[ScienceRocks]

Both UAH and RSS shows a warmer August compared to July...

Giss probably will come in around .83-.85 range.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

lol......ask any person alive in the northeast if they thought this August was even warm, much less hot!! Oly the bozo alarmists think perceptions of this stuff is immaterial.

Well, that would be a stupid thing to do. The correct thing to do would be to consult the data, not ask people what they "feel".

But thats not the real world s0n which is exactly my whole point. Nobody cares about the data........less than 1% of people are home tonight mulling through climate data. Why? Because they have about 4 billion better things to do. But they certainly go into wtf mode when they spend their summer freezing their asses off after having experienced years and years of routine 90's and several days of 100's which haven't been seen in the northeast in years. Its sure as shit does have huge impacts on tens of millions of people when shit isn't squaring with the msm presentation that the world is melting. Again.........that's how it works in the real world and all the evidence of alarmists losing huge on the government policy front ( all over the world btw ) is the kick to the nut sacks.

Shit like the Paris Treaty...........a goof. Government's aren't stoopid.......China increasing its coal production 50% higher by 2040. Oh.......and Europe is going to smash its voters with mega-high electricity bills due to renewable energy curbing CO2??!

I don't fucking think so...........because in the real world, none of the fantasy shit from green assholes ever materializes. It cant.....because costs matter. Except to bubble dwelling socialist nutters who show up every day with their bat and ball science idea's and end up sitting in the dugout for 9 innings.

"Nobody cares about the data.."

I think I'll just let this comment by you stand for itself.

By all means, keep talking.

 

[Old Rocks]

Climate "science" is a joke, it has nothing in common with real science. There's no stated theory, no rigerous experiments; instead it's altered data fed into flawed models and absolutely insane, Hari Krishna bleating about "consensus"

Riiiiiiight... all of these educated people dedicating their lives to this field are all liars or incompetent, and a guy like you who knows less than nothing about the topic has managed to figure them all out.

Here are your "Educated people" This is not a fucking joke or a photoshop, these are climate "Scientists"

Where are the other 100s of 1000s of climate scientists? And why are you showing me a picture of a prop, instead of speaking to published science? What so you think i am.... 5 years old? Embarrassing...

You are speaking to Frankie boi who is convinced that the moon is hollow and hiding the reptilians. LOL

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Oh.

Climate "science" is a joke, it has nothing in common with real science. There's no stated theory, no rigerous experiments; instead it's altered data fed into flawed models and absolutely insane, Hari Krishna bleating about "consensus"

Riiiiiiight... all of these educated people dedicating their lives to this field are all liars or incompetent, and a guy like you who knows less than nothing about the topic has managed to figure them all out.

Here are your "Educated people" This is not a fucking joke or a photoshop, these are climate "Scientists"

Where are the other 100s of 1000s of climate scientists? And why are you showing me a picture of a prop, instead of speaking to published science? What so you think i am.... 5 years old? Embarrassing...

You are speaking to Frankie boi who is convinced that the moon is hollow and hiding the reptilians. LOL

Oh.

 

[westwall]

Climate "science" is a joke, it has nothing in common with real science. There's no stated theory, no rigerous experiments; instead it's altered data fed into flawed models and absolutely insane, Hari Krishna bleating about "consensus"

Riiiiiiight... all of these educated people dedicating their lives to this field are all liars or incompetent, and a guy like you who knows less than nothing about the topic has managed to figure them all out.

Here are your "Educated people" This is not a fucking joke or a photoshop, these are climate "Scientists"

Where are the other 100s of 1000s of climate scientists? And why are you showing me a picture of a prop, instead of speaking to published science? What so you think i am.... 5 years old? Embarrassing...

You are speaking to Frankie boi who is convinced that the moon is hollow and hiding the reptilians. LOL

And you're the asshat that laughs at Dr. Feynman, a scientist renowned for making the sort of idiots who's asses you kiss, look like the fools they are.

Here he is showing the NASA scientists to have been locked in their little world and ignoring all other possibilities. EXACTLY like climatologists today who ignore all other climate evidence in favor of their failed theories. Feynman would have crucified them.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Climate "science" is a joke, it has nothing in common with real science. There's no stated theory, no rigerous experiments; instead it's altered data fed into flawed models and absolutely insane, Hari Krishna bleating about "consensus"

Riiiiiiight... all of these educated people dedicating their lives to this field are all liars or incompetent, and a guy like you who knows less than nothing about the topic has managed to figure them all out.

Here are your "Educated people" This is not a fucking joke or a photoshop, these are climate "Scientists"

Where are the other 100s of 1000s of climate scientists? And why are you showing me a picture of a prop, instead of speaking to published science? What so you think i am.... 5 years old? Embarrassing...

You are speaking to Frankie boi who is convinced that the moon is hollow and hiding the reptilians. LOL

And you're the asshat that laughs at Dr. Feynman, a scientist renowned for making the sort of idiots who's asses you kiss, look like the fools they are.

Here he is showing the NASA scientists to have been locked in their little world and ignoring all other possibilities. EXACTLY like climatologists today who ignore all other climate evidence in favor of their failed theories. Feynman would have crucified them.

Dr. Feynman: "I know little about climate science."

His error was not to stop right there.

 

[ScienceRocks]

One of the first things the professor in the statistics class stated is that no model can duplicate nature, but they can be close enough to be useful. Now considering the predictions of the deniers, and the predictions of the professional scientists, one can see that the scientists have been far more accurate than the deniers. The scientists predicted that as the atmosphere and the oceans warmed, we would see far more extreme precipitation events. Harvey was just one example of that that we are seeing today.

So that's why you keep changing the data - to make it more accurately reflect the model.

^ 2 decades, no warming

Really? Someone doesn't know how to read a graph. lol 98+% of the months are above anything we had before 1998 and exluding 1998 you'll find at least 85% of months between 1999 and 2015 below last month.

Not warming? Give me a break.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

One of the first things the professor in the statistics class stated is that no model can duplicate nature, but they can be close enough to be useful. Now considering the predictions of the deniers, and the predictions of the professional scientists, one can see that the scientists have been far more accurate than the deniers. The scientists predicted that as the atmosphere and the oceans warmed, we would see far more extreme precipitation events. Harvey was just one example of that that we are seeing today.

So that's why you keep changing the data - to make it more accurately reflect the model.

^ 2 decades, no warming

View attachment 148121

Really? Someone doesn't know how to read a graph. lol 98+% of the months are above anything we had before 1998 and exluding 1998 you'll find at least 85% of months between 1999 and 2015 below last month.

Not warming? Give me a break.

1998 was the peak, its been downhill from there. 2 decades of failed AGW.

You were saying?