Fort Fun Indiana
Diamond Member
- Mar 10, 2017
- 92,902
- 60,314
- 2,645
That didn't happen.The beaches that the liberals said would be gone in 2020
See what happens when you wank it to a headline, but don't read the details?
Got anything else?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
That didn't happen.The beaches that the liberals said would be gone in 2020
The investigation is far from over. Scientists reach different conclusions based upon the datasets they review. Arguing the science is settled to try to halt investigation is unhelpful and the antithesis of science.Check it out.
Yet another denier butthurt hysterics thread.
We just don't have enough of those here.
But then, it's not like they can do anything else. They're all 'effin imbeciles who are incapable of discussing the topic. They spend their days trying to stop the adults from having adult discussions, by way of constant deflections and weirdass conspiracy theories.
Now do what you do best, deniers. Run back to your masters, lick their fascist boots with gusto, and beg for more lies that you can repeat.
Remember, follow the money. All the corrupting money goes into denier pockets, which is why all of the corruption is on the denier side. They then project their own festering corruption on to ethical people as a way of covering it up. Any honest scientist could double their salary by lying for the deniers. They don't. They effectively take a pay cut by refusing to lie, which gives them even more cred.
And by the way, the fact that the climate scientists have been correct with all their predictions shouldn't give them credibility. Oh wait, it should. That is, if you're not a cult imbecile.
Which isn't happening anywhere except for in your mind. 10s of 1000s of scientists are conducting research as I type this. And they do so with a safe degree of confidence that yes, AGW is real.Arguing the science is settled to try to halt investigation is unhelpful and the antithesis of science.
Which isn't happening anywhere except for in your mind. 10s of 1000s of scientists are conducting research as I type this. And they do so with a safe degree of confidence that yes, AGW is real.
Referring to others as deniers says otherwise.Which isn't happening anywhere except for in your mind. 10s of 1000s of scientists are conducting research as I type this. And they do so with a safe degree of confidence that yes, AGW is real.
Great. See ya.Whether AGW is real or not doesnt matter.
No, that doesn't follow. You are just describing your own, emotional reaction to that.Referring to others as deniers says otherwise.
The science is far from settled. The emotional response is calling someone a denier for no other reason than they hold a different opinion.No, that doesn't follow. You are just describing your own, emotional reaction to that.
If the deniers want to graduate to skeptics, then they can produce some evidence to be considered. Until then, deniers will do.
Ah yes, stay overly general and say nothing. Then you can never be wrong.The science is far from settled. The emotional response is calling someone a denier for no other reason than they hold a different opinion.
Within 30 years everything you believe will be proven wrong by colder temperatures. Increased climate fluctuations and environmental uncertainty are hallmarks of the icehouse world (bipolar glaciation) we live in where the thresholds for extensive continental glaciation are different for both poles and the current temperature is close the threshold for northern hemisphere glaciation.Ah yes, stay overly general and say nothing. Then you can never be wrong.
The idea that the current rapid, observed warming is due to mankind's actions is about as settled as science gets. Scientists have moved on and are now figuring it out how it works, what to expect, etc.
But anyone is invited at any time to challenge that. And no, denying it is not a challenge. A fringe loudmouth with no research is not a skeptic.
They get to sit in the corner with the evolution deniers.
So now you know what you said is stupid, and they are called deniers because they are deniers.
That wouldn't prove any part of AGW theory wrong. Haha, wow, you don't know anything about this topic, do you? And you once again stay overly general and say nothing, anyway. We both know why.Within 30 years everything you believe will be proven wrong by colder temperatures
I’m pretty sure a 2C decrease and all that would entail would be a death knell.That wouldn't prove any part of AGW theory wrong. Haha, wow, you don't know anything about this topic, do you? And you once again stay overly general and say nothing, anyway. We both know why.
Well you are wrong. So remember that next time you think you are pretty sure about something.I’m pretty sure a 2C decrease and all that would entail would be a death knell.
It’s going to be glorious.Well you are wrong. So remember that next time you think you are pretty sure about something.
oh no, we know exactly your ploy! anything is global warming, including cooling. It's why you are full of shit.That wouldn't prove any part of AGW theory wrong. Haha, wow, you don't know anything about this topic, do you? And you once again stay overly general and say nothing, anyway. We both know why.
Well, when you live a fantasy, what isn't? That's the cool thing about fantasy.It’s going to be glorious.
You don't know anything but what your colon tells you.oh no, we know exactly your ploy! anything is global warming, including cooling. It's why you are full of shit.