Schiff may have mischaracterized Parnas evidence, documents show

Nostra

Diamond Member
Oct 7, 2019
62,897
53,989
3,615
This cretin is completely incapable of telling the truth. Ever. On any subject.



Schiff may have mischaracterized Parnas evidence, documents show

House Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff appears to have mischaracterized a text message exchange between two players in the Ukraine saga, according to documents obtained by POLITICO — a possible error the GOP will likely criticize as another example of the Democrats’ rushed effort to impeach President Donald Trump.

The issue arose when Schiff (D-Calif.) sent a letter to House Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler (D-N.Y.) last week summarizing a trove of evidence from Lev Parnas, an indicted former associate of Trump’s personal attorney Rudy Giuliani. In one section of the letter, Schiff claims that Parnas “continued to try to arrange a meeting with President Zelensky,” citing a specific text message exchange where Parnas tells Giuliani: “trying to get us mr Z.” The remainder of the exchange — which was attached to Schiff’s letter — was redacted.



But an unredacted version of the exchange shows that several days later, Parnas sent Giuliani a word document that appears to show notes from an interview with Mykola Zlochevsky, the founder of Burisma, followed by a text message to Giuliani that states: “mr Z answers my brother.” That suggests Parnas was referring to Zlochevsky not Zelensky.


Schiff may have mischaracterized Parnas evidence, documents show


The word document contains a series of questions and answers, but doesn't identify who is doing the asking or answering. Yet the questions center on the hiring practices at Burisma, while the responses include statements such as "we wanted to build Burisma as [an] international company” and "we also thought it would help in Ukraine to have strong international board figures,” which seems to point to Zlochevsky — not the Ukrainian president — as the respondent.
 
The guy is wearing an ankle monitor, and expected to spend time in prison.
Of course he is the shining star of the Dems.
 
Did he lie about that video with Lev, the Vice President's wife and Pence in it? Or did the Vice President lie and say he didn't know Lev Parnas? We'll wait...
 
Did he lie about that video with Lev, the Vice President's wife and Pence in it? Or did the Vice President lie and say he didn't know Lev Parnas? We'll wait...
Perhaps you should read the link in the OP and get educated on the subject of the thread.
 
This cretin is completely incapable of telling the truth. Ever. On any subject.

Schiff may have mischaracterized Parnas evidence, documents show

House Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff appears to have mischaracterized a text message exchange between two players in the Ukraine saga, according to documents obtained by POLITICO — a possible error the GOP will likely criticize as another example of the Democrats’ rushed effort to impeach President Donald Trump.

The issue arose when Schiff (D-Calif.) sent a letter to House Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler (D-N.Y.) last week summarizing a trove of evidence from Lev Parnas, an indicted former associate of Trump’s personal attorney Rudy Giuliani. In one section of the letter, Schiff claims that Parnas “continued to try to arrange a meeting with President Zelensky,” citing a specific text message exchange where Parnas tells Giuliani: “trying to get us mr Z.” The remainder of the exchange — which was attached to Schiff’s letter — was redacted.



But an unredacted version of the exchange shows that several days later, Parnas sent Giuliani a word document that appears to show notes from an interview with Mykola Zlochevsky, the founder of Burisma, followed by a text message to Giuliani that states: “mr Z answers my brother.” That suggests Parnas was referring to Zlochevsky not Zelensky.


Schiff may have mischaracterized Parnas evidence, documents show


The word document contains a series of questions and answers, but doesn't identify who is doing the asking or answering. Yet the questions center on the hiring practices at Burisma, while the responses include statements such as "we wanted to build Burisma as [an] international company” and "we also thought it would help in Ukraine to have strong international board figures,” which seems to point to Zlochevsky — not the Ukrainian president — as the respondent.

I'm glad someone is paying attention to all this, because I can't stand to watch it at all. I tried to for awhile today and ended up running screaming from the room.
 
This cretin is completely incapable of telling the truth. Ever. On any subject.



Schiff may have mischaracterized Parnas evidence, documents show

House Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff appears to have mischaracterized a text message exchange between two players in the Ukraine saga, according to documents obtained by POLITICO — a possible error the GOP will likely criticize as another example of the Democrats’ rushed effort to impeach President Donald Trump.

The issue arose when Schiff (D-Calif.) sent a letter to House Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler (D-N.Y.) last week summarizing a trove of evidence from Lev Parnas, an indicted former associate of Trump’s personal attorney Rudy Giuliani. In one section of the letter, Schiff claims that Parnas “continued to try to arrange a meeting with President Zelensky,” citing a specific text message exchange where Parnas tells Giuliani: “trying to get us mr Z.” The remainder of the exchange — which was attached to Schiff’s letter — was redacted.



But an unredacted version of the exchange shows that several days later, Parnas sent Giuliani a word document that appears to show notes from an interview with Mykola Zlochevsky, the founder of Burisma, followed by a text message to Giuliani that states: “mr Z answers my brother.” That suggests Parnas was referring to Zlochevsky not Zelensky.


Schiff may have mischaracterized Parnas evidence, documents show


The word document contains a series of questions and answers, but doesn't identify who is doing the asking or answering. Yet the questions center on the hiring practices at Burisma, while the responses include statements such as "we wanted to build Burisma as [an] international company” and "we also thought it would help in Ukraine to have strong international board figures,” which seems to point to Zlochevsky — not the Ukrainian president — as the respondent.
May have?

Unredacted material shows he lied about who "Mr. Z." was.

Schiff claimed that Parnas “continued to try to arrange a meeting with President Zelensky,” and cited a specific text message exchange where Parnas tells Giuliani: “trying to get us mr Z.” The remainder of the exchange — which was attached to Schiff’s letter — was redacted.

But the unredacted version of the exchange shows that Parnas sent Giuliani a word document of an interview with Mykola Zlochevsky, showing that Parnas was referring to Zlochevsky not Zelensky.

The most charitable view is that Schiff committed the equivalent of Congressional malpractice by not looking more than an inch deep to determine the facts before foisting this erroneous information on his colleagues and the American public.

But given the selective redactions and contextual clues, it seems as though Chairman Schiff deliberately sought to portray an innocuous meeting with Ukrainian oligarch Mykola Zlochevsky as an insidious one with the President of Ukraine simply because both of their surnames start with the letter Z.
 
may have - conjecture

conjecture and your stupidity = indisputable
 
If Adolph Schiffler's lips are moving he is lying.

Why is anyone surprised by this when every single time it is proven he is a pathological liar?


This cretin is completely incapable of telling the truth. Ever. On any subject.



Schiff may have mischaracterized Parnas evidence, documents show

House Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff appears to have mischaracterized a text message exchange between two players in the Ukraine saga, according to documents obtained by POLITICO — a possible error the GOP will likely criticize as another example of the Democrats’ rushed effort to impeach President Donald Trump.

The issue arose when Schiff (D-Calif.) sent a letter to House Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler (D-N.Y.) last week summarizing a trove of evidence from Lev Parnas, an indicted former associate of Trump’s personal attorney Rudy Giuliani. In one section of the letter, Schiff claims that Parnas “continued to try to arrange a meeting with President Zelensky,” citing a specific text message exchange where Parnas tells Giuliani: “trying to get us mr Z.” The remainder of the exchange — which was attached to Schiff’s letter — was redacted.



But an unredacted version of the exchange shows that several days later, Parnas sent Giuliani a word document that appears to show notes from an interview with Mykola Zlochevsky, the founder of Burisma, followed by a text message to Giuliani that states: “mr Z answers my brother.” That suggests Parnas was referring to Zlochevsky not Zelensky.


Schiff may have mischaracterized Parnas evidence, documents show


The word document contains a series of questions and answers, but doesn't identify who is doing the asking or answering. Yet the questions center on the hiring practices at Burisma, while the responses include statements such as "we wanted to build Burisma as [an] international company” and "we also thought it would help in Ukraine to have strong international board figures,” which seems to point to Zlochevsky — not the Ukrainian president — as the respondent.
 
'Mis-characterized'?

Bwuhahahaha......just call it what it is: SCHIFF LIED...AGAIN!

It is down-right TREASONOUS that the House Coup Managers appear before the Senate and declare them to be guilty of a cover-up by hiding information when Schiff and the Democrats have continued to hide probably the 2 most significant pieces of evidence that completely destroys their House Impeachment:

1. The Ukraine Prosecutor had already begun an investigation of Burisma and was planning on calling in Hunter Biden to answer questions BEFORE President Trump's phone call with the Ukraine PM

2. Falsely claiming / implying 'Mr. Z' was Ukraine President Zelensky.

Let me guess - by the end of the day Schiff and CNN will be claiming this Parnas 'Evidence' was just another one of his 'PARODIES'.

:rolleyes:
 
may have - conjecture

conjecture and your stupidity = indisputable
Sez the single digit IQ Dimwinger who thinks it only takes 51 Senators to remove a President.:21:
 
may have - conjecture

conjecture and your stupidity = indisputable
I love how ACTUAL evidence of Democrat misconduct and crimes makes you squeal like a stuck pig, always willing to bend the space / time continuum and outer limits of reason and reality to give proven, repeated, admitted law-breaking Democrats the 'benefit of the LIE' (not doubt)....
 

Forum List

Back
Top