Sandy Hook Lawsuit against Remington Arms Allowed to Move Forward

Our law courts stand just fine.
But Comrade Starkiev does not know his ass from a hole in the ground and he loves having someone stick a broom up his ass. He loves those "Moscow Show Trials" from his native USSR.
What a stupid thing to say, but you are Comrade Stupid on this Board.

You and I both know why you want the Rule of Man to replace the Rule of Law.


OK cocksucker, explain why having "judges" be IMMUNE FROM LAWSUITS advances Liberty and Constitutional government .
 
Our law courts stand just fine.
But Comrade Starkiev does not know his ass from a hole in the ground and he loves having someone stick a broom up his ass. He loves those "Moscow Show Trials" from his native USSR.
What a stupid thing to say, but you are Comrade Stupid on this Board.

You and I both know why you want the Rule of Man to replace the Rule of Law.


OK cocksucker, explain why having "judges" be IMMUNE FROM LAWSUITS advances Liberty and Constitutional government .
I will when you tell the Board why you want the Rule of Man.
 
If this prevails, it will bankrupt the gun manufactures. It is the perfect way for the Obama regime to implement gun control. It makes as much sense as suing Ford for being the car the drunk driver was driving when he hit you.
It won't bankrupt the gun manufacturers. It's not that difficult a case to defend. Because if the plaintiff's win it will open a floodgate of lawsuits against the manufacturers of automobiles, fast-foods, candy, liquor and on and on and on.

I don't know what is behind this judge's ruling but it's either political, bribery, blackmail -- or simple ignorance of anything related to guns. Because ignorance is behind all anti-gun reasoning.
 
If this prevails, it will bankrupt the gun manufactures. It is the perfect way for the Obama regime to implement gun control. It makes as much sense as suing Ford for being the car the drunk driver was driving when he hit you.
It won't bankrupt the gun manufacturers. It's not that difficult a case to defend. Because if the plaintiff's win it will open a floodgate of lawsuits against the manufacturers of automobiles, fast-foods, candy, liquor and on and on and on.

I don't know what is behind this judge's ruling but it's either political, bribery, blackmail -- or simple ignorance of anything related to guns. Because ignorance is behind all anti-gun reasoning.

I would agree if we weren't setting libs on the bench and supreme court. The goal is disarmament. What ever means at their disposal.
 
Sandy Hook Lawsuit Allowed to Move Forward

DgQSnLw7odsAcw5FtJ1M61prnHsCwgoGYRI4k7UpcjoBMlfp1hoxGMdvVUrUin8UHGqDeRaZFNfDEhdB-NII3845KuDDe4QNDFbv=s0-d-e1-ft

Connecticut Superior Court Judge Barbara N Bellis ruled Thursday that "a lawsuit can go forward against the maker of the rifle used in the 2012 Sandy Hook Elementary School shootings," rejecting the “argument that a 2005 federal law can protect gun businesses from civil lawsuits.”

Families of several children killed in the Newtown attack and one surviving teacher are suing Remington Arms, parent company of Bushmaster Firearms, who manufactured the weapon — a Bushmaster AR-15 — used by Adam Lanza in the school shooting.

According to The Washington Examiner, the basis of the families' suit is that "the military-style gun should have never been available for civilians to purchase."

Although lawyers for Remington Arms sought to dismiss the lawsuit, Bellis ruled that Remington's argument "that the federal law shields gun manufacturers from most lawsuits over criminal use of their products...would be best made in a motion later in the process and is not grounds to dismiss the lawsuit."

Another miserable piece of shit "judge" who does know her ass from a hole in the ground


.
No, another miserable rightwing nitwit exhibiting his comprehensive ignorance of the law.
 
Sandy Hook Lawsuit Allowed to Move Forward

DgQSnLw7odsAcw5FtJ1M61prnHsCwgoGYRI4k7UpcjoBMlfp1hoxGMdvVUrUin8UHGqDeRaZFNfDEhdB-NII3845KuDDe4QNDFbv=s0-d-e1-ft

Connecticut Superior Court Judge Barbara N Bellis ruled Thursday that "a lawsuit can go forward against the maker of the rifle used in the 2012 Sandy Hook Elementary School shootings," rejecting the “argument that a 2005 federal law can protect gun businesses from civil lawsuits.”

Families of several children killed in the Newtown attack and one surviving teacher are suing Remington Arms, parent company of Bushmaster Firearms, who manufactured the weapon — a Bushmaster AR-15 — used by Adam Lanza in the school shooting.

According to The Washington Examiner, the basis of the families' suit is that "the military-style gun should have never been available for civilians to purchase."

Although lawyers for Remington Arms sought to dismiss the lawsuit, Bellis ruled that Remington's argument "that the federal law shields gun manufacturers from most lawsuits over criminal use of their products...would be best made in a motion later in the process and is not grounds to dismiss the lawsuit."

Another miserable piece of shit "judge" who does know her ass from a hole in the ground


.
Remington will appeal and win.
This is obviously a liberal judge with an ideological ax to grind
This is obviously a ridiculous lie from a rightwing moron who has no idea what he’s talking about.
 
Sandy Hook Lawsuit Allowed to Move Forward

DgQSnLw7odsAcw5FtJ1M61prnHsCwgoGYRI4k7UpcjoBMlfp1hoxGMdvVUrUin8UHGqDeRaZFNfDEhdB-NII3845KuDDe4QNDFbv=s0-d-e1-ft

Connecticut Superior Court Judge Barbara N Bellis ruled Thursday that "a lawsuit can go forward against the maker of the rifle used in the 2012 Sandy Hook Elementary School shootings," rejecting the “argument that a 2005 federal law can protect gun businesses from civil lawsuits.”

Families of several children killed in the Newtown attack and one surviving teacher are suing Remington Arms, parent company of Bushmaster Firearms, who manufactured the weapon — a Bushmaster AR-15 — used by Adam Lanza in the school shooting.

According to The Washington Examiner, the basis of the families' suit is that "the military-style gun should have never been available for civilians to purchase."

Although lawyers for Remington Arms sought to dismiss the lawsuit, Bellis ruled that Remington's argument "that the federal law shields gun manufacturers from most lawsuits over criminal use of their products...would be best made in a motion later in the process and is not grounds to dismiss the lawsuit."

Another miserable piece of shit "judge" who does know her ass from a hole in the ground


.
Remington will appeal and win.
This is obviously a liberal judge with an ideological ax to grind
This is obviously a ridiculous lie from a rightwing moron who has no idea what he’s talking about.
the right wing dont lie or else wed bcalled the rong wing cuz theres the good conservitives right wing and the evil libturdz left wing. itz u libturz that is liers nd r goeng too hell were u belong
 
If this prevails, it will bankrupt the gun manufactures. It is the perfect way for the Obama regime to implement gun control. It makes as much sense as suing Ford for being the car the drunk driver was driving when he hit you.

This is how the left will proceed in their quest to rid the world of guns.
Instead of saying "the left," which is a vague and obscure designation, why not clarify your comment with a more specific and identifiable designation, that being those who know nothing about guns and are afraid of them. Which probably includes the issuing judge.

You might be surprised to know how many who lean toward the political left for a variety of reasons are not opposed to guns or are strongly pro-gun.
 
Can't wait to sue jim beam an Chevy for my cousins dui wreck. Talk about $$$
 

Forum List

Back
Top