2aguy
Diamond Member
- Jul 19, 2014
- 111,975
- 52,248
- 2,290
- Thread starter
- #21
No it wouldn't brain......that is delusional thinking.....what would have stopped him...if the principal and the people in that meeting had one or more pistols on them...that would have actually saved lives....since mass shooters surrender or commit suicide as soon as they are confronted by armed resistance.......that saves lives...
If the principal had a pistol he'd still want the shooter to reload often.
If she had a pistol he would have killed himself right there.....and 26 people would still be alive.....but she was unarmed...and charged anyway...and was gunned down....long before his first reload....one of several reloads
Sorry but you don't know that. And again if an armed defender was there that person would also want the shooter to reload often.
and they would be disappointed since the shooter could get full capacity magazines but the law abiding citizen can't .....just ask the 3 French Terrorists and the Terrorist in belgium who all got 30 round magazines in Countries where all magazines are illegal...and 2 of those terrorists were even on French terrorist watch lists...and still got not only 30 round magazines, but fully automatic weapons, hand grenades, pistols...with standard magazines, and a rocket propelled grenade launcher.....
banning magazines is stupid....
Defense is 2-3 shots. The defender would be fine. Only mass shooters and gang bangers are using hi cap magazines. Why do you want them to be so well armed?
Sorry brain...there are cases where defenders used more than 2-3 rounds......