sadly, for anti gunners, mass shooting was black on black, so they can't exploit it...

2aguy

Diamond Member
Jul 19, 2014
111,978
52,258
2,290
Yes. the mass shooting in New Orleans......should have had pages and pages of anti gun extremists going nuts...or more nuts, over the shooting of 7 people...and it should have had wall to wall coverage on the cable networks...but gosh darn it........it was black on black.....and that ruined it.....

Where Is Liberal Rage Over Mass Shooting In New Orleans? | RedState

The fact that there were no fatalities absolutely contributes to the lesser cable news coverage, but how to explain our liberal friends, who rush to Twitter every time a shell casing or ear plug is found on the ground? As I said, after other mass shootings, as any RedState reader knows, Twitter is wall-to-wall liberals and celebrities bashing guns and gun owners. MSNBC does dedicated coverage for hours.

And keep in mind that this was not a mere nothing. Seventeen people were hit by bullets. One was just a ten-year-old boy. Another will probably never walk again. At the time this article was written, several were still in the hospital. It is only chance that there were not more victims, and that none died. As many as 500 people were in the park for the block party and for the filming of a music video. This was a dramatic, mass shooting, with hundreds of Americans running for their lives in a panic in their own community from a hail of bullets. This doesn’t merit the Twitter deluge?

Here is something to know: the shooting took place between two rival groups and is believed to be gang-related. The police chief believes that it may have something to do with the heroin trade. That means it was a crime shooting, a shootout between criminals (and that witnesses, incidentally, appear afraid to talk to the police, though it is believed many in attendance know who the shooters were.)
 
It could have been five Beaners, who shot five *******, trying to shoot five Gooks, who were holding hostage five Micks raping five Cracker bitches and it wouldn't matter a fuckin' damn, we still want all the fucking guns. Clear??
 
Yes. the mass shooting in New Orleans......should have had pages and pages of anti gun extremists going nuts...or more nuts, over the shooting of 7 people...and it should have had wall to wall coverage on the cable networks...but gosh darn it........it was black on black.....and that ruined it.....

Where Is Liberal Rage Over Mass Shooting In New Orleans? | RedState

The fact that there were no fatalities absolutely contributes to the lesser cable news coverage, but how to explain our liberal friends, who rush to Twitter every time a shell casing or ear plug is found on the ground? As I said, after other mass shootings, as any RedState reader knows, Twitter is wall-to-wall liberals and celebrities bashing guns and gun owners. MSNBC does dedicated coverage for hours.

And keep in mind that this was not a mere nothing. Seventeen people were hit by bullets. One was just a ten-year-old boy. Another will probably never walk again. At the time this article was written, several were still in the hospital. It is only chance that there were not more victims, and that none died. As many as 500 people were in the park for the block party and for the filming of a music video. This was a dramatic, mass shooting, with hundreds of Americans running for their lives in a panic in their own community from a hail of bullets. This doesn’t merit the Twitter deluge?

Here is something to know: the shooting took place between two rival groups and is believed to be gang-related. The police chief believes that it may have something to do with the heroin trade. That means it was a crime shooting, a shootout between criminals (and that witnesses, incidentally, appear afraid to talk to the police, though it is believed many in attendance know who the shooters were.)

New Orleans doesn't really have "gangs" the same way other cities do.

More like different groups of kinfolk.
 

Forum List

Back
Top