S&P John Chambers, who maybe should remain anonymous, did acknowledge that arithmetic is not involved in their widely public five factors applied to Sovereign Debt.
1. Using The Political Factor, then "The System Sucks." Someone is about to become a 1960's radical, was a 1960's radical, or is friends with the Obama Administration: Which acknowledges that the U.S. has now(?), or not, shown AAA political system status.
2. Using The Fiscal Factor, then see number one.
3. Using The Economy Factor, then the U. S. is prosperous & relatively exemplary.
4. Using The Currency Factor, then the U. S. dollar is the international standard, so no problem there.
5. Using The Money Factor, then the U. S. policy is exemplary and can even be called (socialist). . ."a world standard."
Obama administration official: S&P move 'a facts-be-damned decision' - CNN.com
A weighting system is apparently not invovled, and the $2.0 tril. snafu suggests that just maybe that S&P Chambers doesn't want to admit to any shortcomings.
So a free market Haiti or Somalia, or Kenya, or East Africa the United States is not. But there was the Bush Administration. . .II, (Terms I and II)(?).
That also may be how they count(?), and do math(?): As though there were no decimal points at all!
The stock market should actually do fairly well, by those "standards," and especially if California can legalize marijuana completely--like in Los Angeles dispensary locations: And tax it.
"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Law and Politics, S&P seems to know a great deal about!)
1. Using The Political Factor, then "The System Sucks." Someone is about to become a 1960's radical, was a 1960's radical, or is friends with the Obama Administration: Which acknowledges that the U.S. has now(?), or not, shown AAA political system status.
2. Using The Fiscal Factor, then see number one.
3. Using The Economy Factor, then the U. S. is prosperous & relatively exemplary.
4. Using The Currency Factor, then the U. S. dollar is the international standard, so no problem there.
5. Using The Money Factor, then the U. S. policy is exemplary and can even be called (socialist). . ."a world standard."
Obama administration official: S&P move 'a facts-be-damned decision' - CNN.com
A weighting system is apparently not invovled, and the $2.0 tril. snafu suggests that just maybe that S&P Chambers doesn't want to admit to any shortcomings.
So a free market Haiti or Somalia, or Kenya, or East Africa the United States is not. But there was the Bush Administration. . .II, (Terms I and II)(?).
That also may be how they count(?), and do math(?): As though there were no decimal points at all!
The stock market should actually do fairly well, by those "standards," and especially if California can legalize marijuana completely--like in Los Angeles dispensary locations: And tax it.
"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Law and Politics, S&P seems to know a great deal about!)
Last edited: