Russian spending on Google for advertising in 2016 election was $4700 ---WITH SOURCE! GOOGLE CEO

ColonelAngus

Diamond Member
Feb 25, 2015
52,026
51,923
3,615
Jesus, TAZ, the Google CEO testified about it to Congress. I thought it was common knowledge.

HERE IS THE SOURCE:

‘Full Extent’ of Russian Meddling on Google in 2016? $4,700 Spent on Ads (VIDEO)












Search Modes
All
News
Images
Shopping
Videos
Settings
upload_2018-12-13_16-42-55.jpeg
‘Full Extent’ of Russian Meddling on Google in 2016? $4,700 Spent on Ads (VIDEO)

Sputnik International
2 days ago
upload_2018-12-13_16-42-55.jpeg
‘4,700 on Google ads – that’s it? We never found evidence of Russian collusion’

RT
6 hours ago
upload_2018-12-13_16-42-55.jpeg
Google CEO Splashes Cold Water On A Major Russian Meddling Narrative

The Daily Caller
1 day ago
More for $4700 Russian Ads
Web results
'Full Extent' of Russian Meddling on Google in 2016? $4,700 Spent on ...

https://sputniknews.com/.../201812111070598758-full-extent-russian-meddling-4700...

2 days ago - $4,700 Spent on Ads (VIDEO) ... ad accounts linked to Russia which advertised on Google for about $4,700 in advertising," Pichai responded.
'4,700 on Google ads – that's it? We never found evidence of Russian ...

https://www.rt.com/usa/446381-google-4700-russian-collusion/

7 hours ago - The goal of 'Russian collusion' hearings is not the truth – the Democrats are still trying to explain the people who gave a lot of money to Hillary ...
Videos
upload_2018-12-13_16-42-55.jpeg
1:33
Google CEO Admits Russians Only Spent $4700 Dollars On The 2016 ...

Amicus Humani Generis
YouTube - 2 days ago
upload_2018-12-13_16-42-55.jpeg
2:56:23
Facebook 'disruptive Russian ads Clinton's & Trump's campaign

wraps
C-Span - Nov 1, 2017
upload_2018-12-13_16-42-55.jpeg
2:21
Google CEO Sunday Pichai: Russia-Linked Accounts Spent $4700 On ...

Bob Israel
YouTube - 2 days ago
2:42:42
Intelligence Cmte Hearing Russia Ads | User Clip


C-Span - Nov 1, 2017
3:07:00
Senator Al Franken Questions Facebook VP Political Ads Purchased


C-Span - Oct 31, 2017
2:56:23
Facebook Google Twitter Executives Testify Russia's Influence 2016 ...


C-Span - Nov 1, 2017
2:42:42
Facebook Google Twitter Executives Testify Russia's Influence 2016 ...


C-Span - Nov 1, 2017
3:07:00
Facebook, Google and Twitter Executives Testify on Russia Election Ads


C-Span - Oct 31, 2017
2:05
Congress releases sample of Russian ads

CBS Evening News
YouTube - Nov 1, 2017
Web results
Google CEO: Russia-Linked Accounts Spent $4,700 on 2016 Election ...

https://www.breitbart.com/.../google-ceo-russia-linked-ad-accounts-spent-4700-on-20...

2 days ago - Google CEO Sundar Pichai said "ad accounts linked to Russia" spent "about $4700 inadvertising" to influence 2016's presidential election.
Google Finds Accounts Connected to Russia Bought Election Ads ...

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/09/technology/google-russian-ads.html

Oct 9, 2017 - Using accounts believed to be connected to the Russian government, the agents purchased $4,700 worth of search ads and more traditional ...
 
Compare this to the $14 Million Obama, Clinton, and The DNC spent on Russian Propaganda which was then distributed to every media outlet possible resulting in an expenditure of Billions of Dollars in an attempt to alter the outcome of The Election. The Dirty Clinton-Obama funded Russian Dossier was distributed through The FBI, DOJ, FISA Court and resulted so far in the expenditure of $50 Million on one investigation, and another $25 Million spent on another 6 investigations run by various groups.

We don't know how many millions was spent on Illegal Surveillance of The Trump Campaign, and Mueller refuses to investigate how much of this Obama shared with Hillary Clinton Campaign. They essentially were listening in to campaign meetings until Donald Trump got wind of it and started holding them in bug proof conference rooms.

BUT Alltogether $100 Million dollars directly was spent on The Dirty Russian Dossier and Billions spent on Free Advertising about it in the Radio, TV, and Internet.

So Billions spent on The Dirty Dossier to get Clinton Elected, and 4 thousand LEGALLY spent by Russia for some stupid Memes on Twitter and Facebook?

GTFO!

HERR MUELLER WILL GET TO THE BOTTOM OF THAT........ANY.....DAY......NOW!
 
Last edited:
upload_2018-12-13_17-5-30.png
 
Jesus, TAZ, the Google CEO testified about it to Congress. I thought it was common knowledge.

HERE IS THE SOURCE:

‘Full Extent’ of Russian Meddling on Google in 2016? $4,700 Spent on Ads (VIDEO)












Search Modes
All
News
Images
Shopping
Videos
Settings
View attachment 234539
‘Full Extent’ of Russian Meddling on Google in 2016? $4,700 Spent on Ads (VIDEO)
Sputnik International
2 days ago
View attachment 234538
‘4,700 on Google ads – that’s it? We never found evidence of Russian collusion’
RT
6 hours ago
View attachment 234537
Google CEO Splashes Cold Water On A Major Russian Meddling Narrative
The Daily Caller
1 day ago
More for $4700 Russian Ads
Web results
'Full Extent' of Russian Meddling on Google in 2016? $4,700 Spent on ...

https://sputniknews.com/.../201812111070598758-full-extent-russian-meddling-4700...

2 days ago - $4,700 Spent on Ads (VIDEO) ... ad accounts linked to Russia which advertised on Google for about $4,700 in advertising," Pichai responded.
'4,700 on Google ads – that's it? We never found evidence of Russian ...

‘4,700 on Google ads – that’s it? We never found evidence of Russian collusion’
7 hours ago - The goal of 'Russian collusion' hearings is not the truth – the Democrats are still trying to explain the people who gave a lot of money to Hillary ...
Videos
View attachment 234534
1:33
Google CEO Admits Russians Only Spent $4700 Dollars On The 2016 ...
Amicus Humani Generis
YouTube - 2 days ago
View attachment 234536
2:56:23
Facebook 'disruptive Russian ads Clinton's & Trump's campaign
wraps
C-Span - Nov 1, 2017
View attachment 234535
2:21
Google CEO Sunday Pichai: Russia-Linked Accounts Spent $4700 On ...
Bob Israel
YouTube - 2 days ago
2:42:42
Intelligence Cmte Hearing Russia Ads | User Clip


C-Span - Nov 1, 2017
3:07:00
Senator Al Franken Questions Facebook VP Political Ads Purchased


C-Span - Oct 31, 2017
2:56:23
Facebook Google Twitter Executives Testify Russia's Influence 2016 ...


C-Span - Nov 1, 2017
2:42:42
Facebook Google Twitter Executives Testify Russia's Influence 2016 ...


C-Span - Nov 1, 2017
3:07:00
Facebook, Google and Twitter Executives Testify on Russia Election Ads


C-Span - Oct 31, 2017
2:05
Congress releases sample of Russian ads

CBS Evening News
YouTube - Nov 1, 2017
Web results
Google CEO: Russia-Linked Accounts Spent $4,700 on 2016 Election ...

https://www.breitbart.com/.../google-ceo-russia-linked-ad-accounts-spent-4700-on-20...

2 days ago - Google CEO Sundar Pichai said "ad accounts linked to Russia" spent "about $4700 inadvertising" to influence 2016's presidential election.
Google Finds Accounts Connected to Russia Bought Election Ads ...

Google Finds Accounts Connected to Russia Bought Election Ads
Oct 9, 2017 - Using accounts believed to be connected to the Russian government, the agents purchased $4,700 worth of search ads and more traditional ...

Yes, that which can be traced directly back to the Russian Government. Ever hear about Shell Companies? I saw one hell of a lot more false ads than 4700 bucks worth in 2016.
 
So the Google CEO was lying to Congress?

Ouch!

Prison?

No, he was reporting what his records showed. Nothing more, nothing less. In order to find out if there is more, that's up to the Justice Department and good luck with that ever happening.

Of course it’s not going to happen. Nor should it.

You’re speculating when you say Russian shell companies bought more advertisements on google.
 
LOL!
Google wasn't the problem for Russian meddling in 2016.
Social media was: Twitter and Facebook.
How fascinating that the O/P's post missed this fucking elephant in the room:

Russia Spent $1.25M Per Month on Ads, Acted Like an Ad Agency: Mueller

.
Users don't go to Google ads to find what they are looking for in the elections. They go to social media.
.
.
That doesnt sound like much money at all. Who knew you could win a presidential election with just a few million dollars? :laugh:
 
So the Google CEO was lying to Congress?

Ouch!

Prison?

No, he was reporting what his records showed. Nothing more, nothing less. In order to find out if there is more, that's up to the Justice Department and good luck with that ever happening.

Of course it’s not going to happen. Nor should it.

You’re speculating when you say Russian shell companies bought more advertisements on google.

It's like figuring out how a magician does a trick. Don't try and figure out how HE does the trick. Figure out how YOU would do the trick. Chances are, that is exactly how he did the trick.
 
So the Google CEO was lying to Congress?

Ouch!

Prison?

No, he was reporting what his records showed. Nothing more, nothing less. In order to find out if there is more, that's up to the Justice Department and good luck with that ever happening.

Of course it’s not going to happen. Nor should it.

You’re speculating when you say Russian shell companies bought more advertisements on google.

It's like figuring out how a magician does a trick. Don't try and figure out how HE does the trick. Figure out how YOU would do the trick. Chances are, that is exactly how he did the trick.

I don’t disagree with you that it stands to reason that Russia bought more than $4700 of advertising on Google, but for there to be any sort of legal ramifications, it has to be evidentiary.

The Google CEO claimed they did a very thorough investigation.
 
Actually that's pretty cheap compared to what taxpayers spend in a secret budget to pay the CIA to do the same freaking thing. Thanks to the democrat funded education system that teaches high school kids how to put a condom on a freaking pickle we have a generation of citizens who ain't got a freaking clue. Young kids pretty much don't read for enjoyment or knowledge anymore so they aren't aware that the CIA and the KGB have been engaged in a propaganda war going back to freaking Harry Truman (who)? . When the idiots in the media claim to discover a KGB plot to disrupt the presidential election it comes as a shock to voting age kids who were raised on video games.
 
All they ever have is fantastically spun fabrication.
So the Google CEO was lying to Congress?

Ouch!

Prison?

No, he was reporting what his records showed. Nothing more, nothing less. In order to find out if there is more, that's up to the Justice Department and good luck with that ever happening.

Of course it’s not going to happen. Nor should it.

You’re speculating when you say Russian shell companies bought more advertisements on google.
 
Though I thought it was a banana... lol, times change, I guess.
Great post.
Actually that's pretty cheap compared to what taxpayers spend in a secret budget to pay the CIA to do the same freaking thing. Thanks to the democrat funded education system that teaches high school kids how to put a condom on a freaking pickle we have a generation of citizens who ain't got a freaking clue. Young kids pretty much don't read for enjoyment or knowledge anymore so they aren't aware that the CIA and the KGB have been engaged in a propaganda war going back to freaking Harry Truman (who)? . When the idiots in the media claim to discover a KGB plot to disrupt the presidential election it comes as a shock to voting age kids who were raised on video games.
 
LOL!
Google wasn't the problem for Russian meddling in 2016.
Social media was: Twitter and Facebook.
How fascinating that the O/P's post missed this little tidbit:

Russia Spent $1.25M Per Month on Ads, Acted Like an Ad Agency: Mueller

.
.
.
.
What Mueller is ignoring maybe, is what was the effectiveness of the alledged meddling, and the reasoning for it by the Russians ???? Otherwise did it really warrant this expensive investigation in regards to the electorate being swayed or not by it ??

Russian alledged meddling either supports one ideology or another in America, so if Russian adds spurred on Americans to vote based upon an ideology that was accepted and practiced by Americans already, then how does this change election results if such adds could only support the ideology of Americans who embrace the accepted American ideology in which the adds targeted ??

Now if the Russians knew that the incoming candidate (who is supposed to be their alledged puppet), was dialed in on the mood and/or wants or needs of the electorate, and the meddling targeted those same needs by building the adds upon those needs and/or wants found in the electorate for a candidate supposedly beholding to them, then what was the goal after such a candidate was to be elected to power ?? Was there gonna be something in it for them after the candidate was to be elected in the same way that Obama was overheard on the open mic saying he could do more after the election for Vlad ??

Ok, so after our President was elected, and he is surrounded by power who is there to keep him in check, and so tell me how any President is able to secretly make deals with, or to sell arms to or to share secrets with, and all without our government finding this out anytime during a presidents years in office ???

Do we have no faith what so ever in our country or is this all about something way more sinical going on in all of this ??

Otherwise is there a coup taking place in all of this ??
 
Last edited:
LOL!
Google wasn't the problem for Russian meddling in 2016.
Social media was: Twitter and Facebook.
How fascinating that the O/P's post missed this little tidbit:

Russia Spent $1.25M Per Month on Ads, Acted Like an Ad Agency: Mueller

.
.
.
.
What Mueller is ignoring maybe, is what was the effectiveness of the alledged meddling, and the reasoning for it by the Russians ???? Otherwise did it really warrant this expensive investigation in regards to the electorate being swayed or not by it ??

Russian alledged meddling either supports one ideology or another in America, so if Russian adds spurred on Americans to vote based upon an ideology that was accepted and practiced by Americans already, then how does this change election results if such adds could only support the ideology of Americans who embrace the accepted American ideology in which the adds targeted ??

Now if the Russians knew that the incoming candidate (who is supposed to be their alledged puppet), was dialed in on the mood and/or wants or needs of the electorate, and the meddling targeted those same needs by building the adds upon those needs and/or wants found in the electorate for a candidate supposedly beholding to them, then what was the goal after such a candidate was to be elected to power ?? Was there gonna be something in it for them after the candidate was to be elected in the same way that Obama was overheard on the open mic saying he could do more after the election for Vlad ??

Ok, so after our President was elected, and he is surrounded by power who is there to keep him in check, then tell me how any President is able to secretly make deals with, or to sell arms to or to share secrets with, and all without our government finding this out anytime during a presidents years in office ???

Do we have no faith what so ever in our country or is this all about something way more sinical going on in all of this ??

Otherwise is there a couple taking place in all of this ??

There is a very powerful sect within DC that is about money and power and Trump is a direct threat to that group. They need him out, period, so they can get back to fleecing the taxpayers and growing their power.

That’s what this whole thing is about.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top