- Thread starter
- #261
Neither you nor she is able to show her work is a well thought out and documented argument. Just because you say it doesn't make it a fact or true. If you are fooled by her antiquated methods of hackery and dissemination of misinformation through the presentation of conspiracy theories, that is fine. You have just as much right to an opinion as anyone. When you can defend her distortions and out of context representations with academically accepted methods of refuting the challenging of those misrepresentations your criticism may be respected as something more than misguided whining.If the PoliticalChics and CruesaderFranks had legitimate arguments and points to make they wouldn't have to always rely on name calling, insults and self aggrandizing. They are unable to make their opinions stand on their own. The constant use of these methods indicates that not even they have confidence or really believe the nonsense they spew and blather. In the end it mostly adds up to creative hate speech complimented with lies and misinformation.
PC has made a very well thought out and documented argument, and many of the posts aimed at her have been nothing but name calling.
Funny that doesn't make you think their arguments are weak...
Guess libs can dish it out, but can't take it.
You remain a low-life liar.