HoleInTheVoid
Active Member
- Sep 10, 2008
- 860
- 89
- 28
You're an idiot.Why would the President be discussing troop movements with the press in the first place?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You're an idiot.Why would the President be discussing troop movements with the press in the first place?
3. I have heard this argument before. If I may...
Yes, it was a debate, but the federalists were expounding as to why they wrote what they wrote, a document already produced. They were not seeking Gov George Clinton's (who through some bizarrely frakish teleporter accident would later split into George Bush and Bill Clinton...think about it, man!) advice on its final form.
I am unaware of anything in Fed 23 that contradicts our Constitution and as such will treat it as representative of their thoughts on the extent of executive power.
Furthermore, if we cannot rely on the FP than surely the body of all other founding commentary must equally be jeopardized. We cannot chance such things as the RKBA to the unanchored opinion of judicial fads. Rather, we have a duty to call upon the extra-constitutional writings of the founders that comport with the Constitution to act as bulwarks.
4. Sen Kerry was at least guilty of the Logan Act.