Ron Paul On Compromise & Democracy...

[paulitician]

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jh9OzjECfaY]Ron Paul on compromise and democracy - YouTube[/ame]

 

[paulitician]

As usual, the Good Doctor is Spot-On. Seriously, he might just be the only Politician worth listening to at this point.

 

[eflatminor]

He's spot on, again...

 

[Truthmatters]

why does he hate the founders?

 

[peach174]

why does he hate the founders?

Howdy TM.
How ya doing? Was you sick or on vacay or something?
Glad to see you back

It's the progressives of both parties (big Federal Government) who hate the founders.

 

[Wry Catcher]

Let's parse Rep. Paul's comments.

1. We live in a democratic republic;

2. Our form of democracy is not pure, it is a republican form wherein we elected those who make the laws;

3. Our form of government isn't perfect, but the best human beings have been able to create;

4. Radicals will always seek to change our form of government to suit their own purpose;

5. And, radicals will always manipulate a rule of law to justify their ends.

 

[jillian]

Let's parse Rep. Paul's comments.

1. We live in a democratic republic;

2. Our form of democaracy is not pure, it is a republican form wherein we elected those who make the laws;

3. Our form of government isn't perfect, but the best human beings have been able to create;

4. Radicals will always seek to change our form of government to suit their own purpose;

5. And, radicals will always employ a rule of law to justify their ends.

your evidence that ours is "best" for this day and time? i'm not saying it is or isn't. but other than jingoistic nonsense, link?

4 and 5 are nonsensical premises and don't derive from the prior statements.

Reality: (and once again why paul is nonsensical and laughed at)

EVERYONE always seeks to change government to suit their own purposes

and EVERYONE uses law as a means to an end.
not exactly deep thunking there by paul

 

[eflatminor]

why does he hate the founders?

Your ignorance never ceases...

But what the hell, just for shits and giggles, tell us exactly why you believe Dr Paul hates the founders. This ought to be a hoot.

 

[paulitician]

why does he hate the founders?

Please explain how he hates the Founders.

 

[jillian]

why does he hate the founders?

Your ignorance never ceases...

But what the hell, just for shits and giggles, tell us exactly why you believe Dr Paul hates the founders. This ought to be a hoot.

ronnie probably doesn't hate them... just what they created.

actually, not even... he's using weak people suseptible to simplistic messages to advance himself.

 

[paulitician]

why does he hate the founders?

Your ignorance never ceases...

But what the hell, just for shits and giggles, tell us exactly why you believe Dr Paul hates the founders. This ought to be a hoot.

ronnie probably doesn't hate them... just what they created.

actually, not even... he's using weak people suseptible to simplistic messages to advance himself.

Another gem from a loyal Obamabot wingnut. Truly priceless.

 

[eflatminor]

...weak people suseptible to simplistic messages to advance himself.

Weak and simple like Hayek, Mises, and Friedman? Whatever you say genius...

 

[jillian]

...weak people suseptible to simplistic messages to advance himself.

Weak and simple like Hayek, Mises, and Friedman? Whatever you say genius...

no one takes mises and the austians seriously...

except for paulian idiots.

truth hurts, sorry, little boy.

 

[paulitician]

...weak people suseptible to simplistic messages to advance himself.

Weak and simple like Hayek, Mises, and Friedman? Whatever you say genius...

Message Boards can be so hilarious. She's too dumb to realize she actually just described herself perfectly. Oh Obamabots, they soo craaazy.

 

[jillian]

Your ignorance never ceases...

But what the hell, just for shits and giggles, tell us exactly why you believe Dr Paul hates the founders. This ought to be a hoot.

ronnie probably doesn't hate them... just what they created.

actually, not even... he's using weak people suseptible to simplistic messages to advance himself.

Another gem from a loyal Obamabot wingnut. Truly priceless.

you keep spouting silliness like that.

you know, i think, that i supported hillary last time around.

knowing your guy is a twit and a hypocrite isn't an anything-bot.

grow up.

 

[TakeAStepBack]

Let's parse Rep. Paul's comments.

1. We live in a democratic republic;

2. Our form of democracy is not pure, it is a republican form wherein we elected those who make the laws;

3. Our form of government isn't perfect, but the best human beings have been able to create;

4. Radicals will always seek to change our form of government to suit their own purpose;
5. And, radicals will always manipulate a rule of law to justify their ends.

 

[eflatminor]

...weak people suseptible to simplistic messages to advance himself.

Weak and simple like Hayek, Mises, and Friedman? Whatever you say genius...

no one takes mises and the austians seriously...

except for paulian idiots.

truth hurts, sorry, little boy.

Well by all means, show us how we're wrong...seeing how you have the 'truth'. Please be specific, use logic and reason, and tell us in your own words why we should not take the Austrian School of Economics seriously.

This ought to be quite revealing...

 

[TakeAStepBack]

Weak and simple like Hayek, Mises, and Friedman? Whatever you say genius...

no one takes mises and the austians seriously...

except for paulian idiots.

truth hurts, sorry, little boy.

Well by all means, show us how we're wrong...seeing how you have the 'truth'. Please be specific, use logic and reason, and tell us in your own words why we should not take the Austrian School of Economics seriously.

This ought to be quite revealing...

More like quite hilarious. She's right. No one does take the guys in the room that have been adding profound knowledge to the field, or predicting it right for 100 years or more serious. It demolishes the states central planning controls to listen to those guys.

Look how they ostricized Schiff and Paul when they called the housing bubble burst right in the early 2000s. Laughed them off almost every media slot they got. Even though they were 100% accurate.

 

[ItsjustmeIthink]

...weak people suseptible to simplistic messages to advance himself.

Weak and simple like Hayek, Mises, and Friedman? Whatever you say genius...

Message Boards can be so hilarious. She's too dumb to realize she actually just described herself perfectly. Oh Obamabots, they soo craaazy.

You're the biggest bot in USMB. No matter what, your "great teacher" or whatever you call him is ALWAYS right. Seldom are their facts or studies to back him up, but who needs facts when you're always right, right?

If the voting age were 21 Paul wouldn't even be in politics.

 

[TakeAStepBack]

Weak and simple like Hayek, Mises, and Friedman? Whatever you say genius...

Message Boards can be so hilarious. She's too dumb to realize she actually just described herself perfectly. Oh Obamabots, they soo craaazy.

You're the biggest bot in USMB. No matter what, your "great teacher" or whatever you call him is ALWAYS right. Seldom are their facts or studies to back him up, but who needs facts when you're always right, right?

If the voting age were 21 Paul wouldn't even be in politics.

Yes. His voting constituency in texas consisted of 21 or younger. It's pretty funny to listen to some people's babble.