Paulie
Diamond Member
- May 19, 2007
- 40,769
- 6,382
- 1,830
Agreed since that's what we have had for a very long time now with a heavily stacked liberal Court and it has been hugely detrimental. But I said nothing about wanting either conservative or liberal judges. I want Constitutionalists who understand that they are to interpret the existing law and that it corrupts the whole purpose of the Court to legislate from the bench as well as violates the integrity of the Constitution.
I don't really understand how you can go on about the constitution, but say that Ron Paul is the last GOP candidate you'd vote for...he's the only one who ABIDES by the constitution!! Romney said in a debate that he'd have to "check with the lawyers" before making a decision...CHECK WITH LAWYERS???? All you have to do is check with the CONSTITUTION! And Ron pointed that out to him with great fervor, I must say.
Likewise with Rudy on the constitution...he'd launch a war against Iran without it being DECLARED by congress...something that doesn't happen anymore in US Government, war declaration, and it's the only constitutionally legal way to go to war. You don't vote to let the president decide if he wants to go to war, you vote to DECLARE it, go FIGHT it, and come home when you're finished...you know, "mission accomplished"?
McCain has even referred to Ron as "the most honest man in congress". So that means that McCain and the rest of congress must lie sometimes then, or else he would be referring to HIMSELF as the most honest. You want to vote for someone who lies? McCain is a stubborn war hawk, and an obvious flip-flopper...just check his record.
Huckabee would let illegals stay here because it's "religiously moral". Is that not absurd?? What does religion have to do with our national immigration LAWS??
Tancredo isn't even close to being electable, if electability plays a role in your decison, and has barely enough money to compete now as it is. Likewise for Hunter.
That leaves Fred. Another flip-flopper, a fake conservative trying to pose as a Reagan protege', when Reagan HIMSELF would endorse Paul before Fred. Reagan and Paul were good friends throughout his administration. He claims "old fashioned conservative vaules". Old fashioned?? Neo-conservatism is hardly old fashioned conservatism. The only thing Fred has going for himself is that wife of his.