Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Funny ... though expected. The extreme left are denying that Obama supports this bailout crap so they can say it's all Jrs. fault, but the extreme right are using it to say Obama is bad while ignoring the fact that Jr. did it to.
Nonsense... We didn't like it when GW did it and it's only GOTTEN EXPONENTIALLY WORSE since Hussein took the reigns...
Funny ... though expected. The extreme left are denying that Obama supports this bailout crap so they can say it's all Jrs. fault, but the extreme right are using it to say Obama is bad while ignoring the fact that Jr. did it to.
Nonsense... We didn't like it when GW did it and it's only GOTTEN EXPONENTIALLY WORSE since Hussein took the reigns...
Seriously? So then all that whining about having to support Jr. just because he's president was just someone else?
On the serious side, it wasn't just George ... why can't you acknowledge the fact that none of these people act on their own? Wait ... that's what the cons with brains say ... damn you DiveCon and Gunny!
Care, I imagine Timmy knew. That doesn't mean Obama did know or had any need to know.
amazing how that is, isnt itCare, I imagine Timmy knew. That doesn't mean Obama did know or had any need to know.
Funny.. but when it came to another certain commander in chief.. and possibly not having knowledge of certain things... or when knowledge changed with further evidence... you screamed that either a) he did know or b) that he sould have known
just sayin'
Care, I imagine Timmy knew. That doesn't mean Obama did know or had any need to know.
Link?Care, I imagine Timmy knew. That doesn't mean Obama did know or had any need to know.
Funny.. but when it came to another certain commander in chief.. and possibly not having knowledge of certain things... or when knowledge changed with further evidence... you screamed that either a) he did know or b) that he sould have known
just sayin'
I'm not making excuses for this administration, but those bonus were in place at the time of BOTH Bush II bailouts of AIG.
Give the size of the crises the BUSH II' admin was facing, I can easily see how such minor details as those bonuses were originally, and subsequently (too) overlooked.
The point is that the issue came to our attention eventually and is finally being questioned.
If find it rather disheartening that some of us are still trying to make this a partisan issue.
Now, look. The USA taxpayers owns the majority equity in this loser company.
Fires these bastards for incompetence and screw them and their bonuses.
No extra taxation is necessary. No breaking of contracts is necessary, eiither.
They don't DESERVE bonuses they deserve to be shown the freaking door!
I'm not making excuses for this administration, but those bonus were in place at the time of BOTH Bush II bailouts of AIG.
Give the size of the crises the BUSH II' admin was facing, I can easily see how such minor details as those bonuses were originally, and subsequently (too) overlooked.
The point is that the issue came to our attention eventually and is finally being questioned.
If find it rather disheartening that some of us are still trying to make this a partisan issue.
Now, look. The USA taxpayers owns the majority equity in this loser company.
Fires these bastards for incompetence and screw them and their bonuses.
No extra taxation is necessary. No breaking of contracts is necessary, eiither.
They don't DESERVE bonuses they deserve to be shown the freaking door!
I'm not making excuses for this administration, but those bonus were in place at the time of BOTH Bush II bailouts of AIG.
Give the size of the crises the BUSH II' admin was facing, I can easily see how such minor details as those bonuses were originally, and subsequently (too) overlooked.
The point is that the issue came to our attention eventually and is finally being questioned.
If find it rather disheartening that some of us are still trying to make this a partisan issue.
Now, look. The USA taxpayers owns the majority equity in this loser company.
Fires these bastards for incompetence and screw them and their bonuses.
No extra taxation is necessary. No breaking of contracts is necessary, eiither.
They don't DESERVE bonuses they deserve to be shown the freaking door!
And I can share a lot of that FEELING... but that is a FEELING.... what they are contractually obligated to is a different thing... I don't agree with a lot of the smoke the DEMs are blowing here... some of which can be VERY dangerous... especially if the precedent is set from those ones who are saying dangerous things like they want to 'punish' even if it means taxing those bonuses "100%"... if that precedent is set, look out for dangerous times with government power ahead
got love that the o man hired the dude that started passing out the money with no strings.....
Blarney Frank should get fired for HIS incompetence instead of threatening AIG employees....but this is all a diversionary tactic to keep the eye off the real ball of money....
While Obama, Blarney, and friends make a big stink about a few paltry bonus millions, BILLIONS are going to Goldman Sachs and European banks with no real accountability....
Biggest Sums
Goldman Sachs led beneficiaries, with $12.9 billion, followed by SocGen, France’s No. 3 bank, with $11.9 billion, and Deutsche Bank, Germany’s biggest lender, with $11.8 billion. AIG and the Fed had previously refused to reveal the counterparties, saying the contracts were confidential and that the information could damage AIG’s business prospects.
AIG Discloses Counterparties as Obama, Cuomo Assail Bonuses - Bloomberg.com
Too bad the Obama media is so complicit in his diversionary tactics. The government is not our friend, they are not out to help us, the American people need to wake up.
I'm not making excuses for this administration, but those bonus were in place at the time of BOTH Bush II bailouts of AIG.
Give the size of the crises the BUSH II' admin was facing, I can easily see how such minor details as those bonuses were originally, and subsequently (too) overlooked.
The point is that the issue came to our attention eventually and is finally being questioned.
If find it rather disheartening that some of us are still trying to make this a partisan issue.
Now, look. The USA taxpayers owns the majority equity in this loser company.
Fires these bastards for incompetence and screw them and their bonuses.
No extra taxation is necessary. No breaking of contracts is necessary, eiither.
They don't DESERVE bonuses they deserve to be shown the freaking door!
And I can share a lot of that FEELING... but that is a FEELING.... what they are contractually obligated to is a different thing... I don't agree with a lot of the smoke the DEMs are blowing here... some of which can be VERY dangerous... especially if the precedent is set from those ones who are saying dangerous things like they want to 'punish' even if it means taxing those bonuses "100%"... if that precedent is set, look out for dangerous times with government power ahead
Anybody care that Dodd was responsible for the AIG bonuses being paid out?
had they not given them tax payer funds in the first place, this wouldnt be a problemPeople it was under contracts.
Anybody care about the law?
the reason it was not in there is it was illegal.
They now found a legal way to recoup the money and you guys are still hallucinating about how it means something else.
