berg80
Diamond Member
- Oct 28, 2017
- 15,110
- 12,502
- 2,320
- Thread starter
- #41
Can't read it, i don't subscribe to the WSJ.What the hell does the WSJ have to do with language in Article I accusing Trump of bribery even if they don't use the specific word? Are you an orc?Oh boy.........you're really on to something now! Not. Read Article I. If you don't think what they described was bribery, extortion, a shakedown, whatever you want to call..........you may not be familiar with the English language.It happened. Why do you ask?
Then why have Democrats changed their narrative to “abuse of power”? Impeachment articles mention neither bribery nor extortion. You a Jew, berg?
The importance of the terms they use to accuse Trump of bribery is secondary to the fact he did it.
So you're smarter than the WSJ?
You also didn't answer my question. Are you a Jew?
I am. Are you a Jew? Read and educate yourself.
Opinion | The Incredible Shrinking Impeachment
But there is indeed an aspect of the impeachment that it appears is shrinking. The Senate trial. You know........when Trump gets to bring out all those witnesses to prove his innocence (wink).
“Senate Republicans say there is an early consensus building within their ranks for a short impeachment trial that could see the GOP-led chamber vote on a likely acquittal of President Donald Trump without hearing from any witnesses.”
GOP Senators Leaning Toward Quick Impeachment Trial for Trump
Bloomberg - Are you a robot?