Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
What a fool
What a fool
Agreed.
You have liberal thread whining about how the 1% are just getting better off all the time.
The libs whine about how income inequality is getting worse (and they are right....just wish they'd suggest something besides taxing it...and also want them to stop whining).
Then ChrissyThePussy comes along and brags about how net worth goes up 26 trillion.
What gives ?
Is that the middle class...really ? If so, what does that mean on a per household basis ?
If not...is it the one percenters ? And does that mean Obama is basically just making the rich richer ?
Which is it.
We'll never get more from ChrissyThePussy....she never backs anything up with any data or analysis.
Just sucks on the her Obama blow up doll's dick.
Six mother scratching years of He-Who-Shall-Not-Be-Named...
Lovely grasp of economics this is:
Proving once more you can't read a chart.Bush exploded Food Stamps! They were going down until Bush & Republicans took over in 2001. Food stamps went up every year Bush was in office.
There are more people on food stamps today than when Barry took office. Despite an economic recovery and impriving job situation. Even as a percent of the population there are many more.
So if Bush was a failure (he wasnt) Barry is failure squared.
You again? I thought you left for good.Six mother scratching years of He-Who-Shall-Not-Be-Named...
Lovely grasp of economics this is:
2007? LOL DUBYA??/ WHY STOP AT 2011? Yes, Dubya/GOP 'job creator' policies put US in a HUGE hole. AND?
Since Jan 2009 (EVEN COUNTING THE 4+ MILLION JOBS LOST BECAUSE OF DUBYA'S POLICIES in 2009), OBAMA HAS A NET OF 7+ MILION PRIVATE SECTOR JOBS. This was AFTER Dubya/GOP 'job creator' policies lost q
1+ million PRIVATE sector jobs
data.bls.gov/timeseries/CES0500000001
Republicans only econonic solutions are deregulation and cutting taxes for corporations/the wealthy. Both of these methods do next to nothing to help the overall economy.
Regulations cost GDP 2% every year. Now even if you were irresponsible and stupid enough to undo ALL regulations for the sake of growth, you would only be boosting 2%. The growth of that is not nearly worth the chaos that would ensue.
Cutting taxes for corporations does jack shit for the economy in general. Stimuluating supply means dick if you don't stimuluate demand. The extra supply that is created does not meet any increase in demand. This means there is no increase in business just because a company has more to sell. Not only that, but cutting taxes only makes the government borrow more which means more debt. The proposed republican tax cuts would add 440 billion to our national debt.
The recent "experiment" failure in Kansas' economy and the pathetic job growth under Bush proves this.
See the republicans you people elect know this. They say they want to help you but in reality they only care about keeping the wealthy happy.
The reality is that the best way to stimulate economic growth is by stimulating the middle class. That is the driving force of our consumption based economy. Republicans have barely done anything for the middle class since Reagan.
Obama's stimulus created close to 3 million jobs. Why? Because it gave the middle class the biggest middle class tax cut since Reagan. It also extended unemployment benefits for the millions who lost their jobs against their will. This allowed them to spend money they wouldn't have otherwise spent because they were unemployed.
This is what you call demand-side economics.
There's no evidence the economy under Reagan did well because of supply side economics. Zero. Bush's tax cuts were huge and job growth under him was pitiful.Republicans only econonic solutions are deregulation and cutting taxes for corporations/the wealthy. Both of these methods do next to nothing to help the overall economy.
Regulations cost GDP 2% every year. Now even if you were irresponsible and stupid enough to undo ALL regulations for the sake of growth, you would only be boosting 2%. The growth of that is not nearly worth the chaos that would ensue.
Cutting taxes for corporations does jack shit for the economy in general. Stimuluating supply means dick if you don't stimuluate demand. The extra supply that is created does not meet any increase in demand. This means there is no increase in business just because a company has more to sell. Not only that, but cutting taxes only makes the government borrow more which means more debt. The proposed republican tax cuts would add 440 billion to our national debt.
The recent "experiment" failure in Kansas' economy and the pathetic job growth under Bush proves this.
See the republicans you people elect know this. They say they want to help you but in reality they only care about keeping the wealthy happy.
The reality is that the best way to stimulate economic growth is by stimulating the middle class. That is the driving force of our consumption based economy. Republicans have barely done anything for the middle class since Reagan.
Obama's stimulus created close to 3 million jobs. Why? Because it gave the middle class the biggest middle class tax cut since Reagan. It also extended unemployment benefits for the millions who lost their jobs against their will. This allowed them to spend money they wouldn't have otherwise spent because they were unemployed.
This is what you call demand-side economics.
The greatest economy in the entire history of America is the RONALD REAGAN REPUBLICAN SUPPLY SIDE ECONOMICS 80S.
You lose again.
There's no evidence the economy under Reagan did well because of supply side economics. Zero. Bush's tax cuts were huge and job growth under him was pitiful.Republicans only econonic solutions are deregulation and cutting taxes for corporations/the wealthy. Both of these methods do next to nothing to help the overall economy.
Regulations cost GDP 2% every year. Now even if you were irresponsible and stupid enough to undo ALL regulations for the sake of growth, you would only be boosting 2%. The growth of that is not nearly worth the chaos that would ensue.
Cutting taxes for corporations does jack shit for the economy in general. Stimuluating supply means dick if you don't stimuluate demand. The extra supply that is created does not meet any increase in demand. This means there is no increase in business just because a company has more to sell. Not only that, but cutting taxes only makes the government borrow more which means more debt. The proposed republican tax cuts would add 440 billion to our national debt.
The recent "experiment" failure in Kansas' economy and the pathetic job growth under Bush proves this.
See the republicans you people elect know this. They say they want to help you but in reality they only care about keeping the wealthy happy.
The reality is that the best way to stimulate economic growth is by stimulating the middle class. That is the driving force of our consumption based economy. Republicans have barely done anything for the middle class since Reagan.
Obama's stimulus created close to 3 million jobs. Why? Because it gave the middle class the biggest middle class tax cut since Reagan. It also extended unemployment benefits for the millions who lost their jobs against their will. This allowed them to spend money they wouldn't have otherwise spent because they were unemployed.
This is what you call demand-side economics.
The greatest economy in the entire history of America is the RONALD REAGAN REPUBLICAN SUPPLY SIDE ECONOMICS 80S.
You lose again.
No evidence? When were you born 2002?
"Obama's stimulus created close to 3 million jobs"..Republicans only econonic solutions are deregulation and cutting taxes for corporations/the wealthy. Both of these methods do next to nothing to help the overall economy.
Regulations cost GDP 2% every year. Now even if you were irresponsible and stupid enough to undo ALL regulations for the sake of growth, you would only be boosting 2%. The growth of that is not nearly worth the chaos that would ensue.
Cutting taxes for corporations does jack shit for the economy in general. Stimuluating supply means dick if you don't stimuluate demand. The extra supply that is created does not meet any increase in demand. This means there is no increase in business just because a company has more to sell. Not only that, but cutting taxes only makes the government borrow more which means more debt. The proposed republican tax cuts would add 440 billion to our national debt.
The recent "experiment" failure in Kansas' economy and the pathetic job growth under Bush proves this.
See the republicans you people elect know this. They say they want to help you but in reality they only care about keeping the wealthy happy.
The reality is that the best way to stimulate economic growth is by stimulating the middle class. That is the driving force of our consumption based economy. Republicans have barely done anything for the middle class since Reagan.
Obama's stimulus created close to 3 million jobs. Why? Because it gave the middle class the biggest middle class tax cut since Reagan. It also extended unemployment benefits for the millions who lost their jobs against their will. This allowed them to spend money they wouldn't have otherwise spent because they were unemployed.
This is what you call demand-side economics.
"Obama's stimulus created close to 3 million jobs"..Republicans only econonic solutions are deregulation and cutting taxes for corporations/the wealthy. Both of these methods do next to nothing to help the overall economy.
Regulations cost GDP 2% every year. Now even if you were irresponsible and stupid enough to undo ALL regulations for the sake of growth, you would only be boosting 2%. The growth of that is not nearly worth the chaos that would ensue.
Cutting taxes for corporations does jack shit for the economy in general. Stimuluating supply means dick if you don't stimuluate demand. The extra supply that is created does not meet any increase in demand. This means there is no increase in business just because a company has more to sell. Not only that, but cutting taxes only makes the government borrow more which means more debt. The proposed republican tax cuts would add 440 billion to our national debt.
The recent "experiment" failure in Kansas' economy and the pathetic job growth under Bush proves this.
See the republicans you people elect know this. They say they want to help you but in reality they only care about keeping the wealthy happy.
The reality is that the best way to stimulate economic growth is by stimulating the middle class. That is the driving force of our consumption based economy. Republicans have barely done anything for the middle class since Reagan.
Obama's stimulus created close to 3 million jobs. Why? Because it gave the middle class the biggest middle class tax cut since Reagan. It also extended unemployment benefits for the millions who lost their jobs against their will. This allowed them to spend money they wouldn't have otherwise spent because they were unemployed.
This is what you call demand-side economics.
It did?
Prove it..
Then define "job".....
hey, junior, that is YOUR opinion.....Just because you can't seem to find a way to make your life better, you feel compelled to place blame on others.I can't believe I have to explain this to you again. Stimuluating supply doesn't do jack shit do stimuluate demand which is how our economy works. The economy thrives on consumer spending. Stimulating supply would make sense if demand was stimulated just as much but republicans don't do that. They are morons like you.Wow, irony on steroids here.
A troll thread from Billy Three-Zip, whose name represents all he knows.
Hey, Billy. Remind us how government spending creates a mulitplier but spending by private companies doesn.t
The unemployed have no money to spend over time. Benefits gives them money. Consumer spending creates economic growth. Every dollar spent on businesses gives them profit. This isn't hard to figure out. This is capitalism 101.
Also, every dollar lost in revenue is replaced by 1.64 in growth. Bush's tax cuts only created .59 cents in growth for every dollar lost in revenue
Genius....Like it or not, our economy is tied to the availability and pricing of energy.I don't deny the energy industry is huge and is an economic asset, but it doesn't provide for a national economy. It is a single industry.Let me remind you how it was the oil and natural gas industries that saved this economy from the fucking shitter. Industries dominated by Republican voters, top to bottom. Industries who, on their own, developed and perfected the process of high volume high pressure hydraulic fracturing. The result? Just look at North Dakota and it's insanely low unemployment. These are middle-class shlubs with no secondary education making six figure incomes. Folks with that kind of money buy shit- houses, cars, whores. Whores! You see? They are why YOU have a job!I can't believe I have to explain this to you again. Stimuluating supply doesn't do jack shit do stimuluate demand which is how our economy works. The economy thrives on consumer spending. Stimulating supply would make sense if demand was stimulated just as much but republicans don't do that. They are morons like you.Wow, irony on steroids here.
A troll thread from Billy Three-Zip, whose name represents all he knows.
Hey, Billy. Remind us how government spending creates a mulitplier but spending by private companies doesn.t
The unemployed have no money to spend over time. Benefits gives them money. Consumer spending creates economic growth. Every dollar spent on businesses gives them profit. This isn't hard to figure out. This is capitalism 101.
Also, every dollar lost in revenue is replaced by 1.64 in growth. Bush's tax cuts only created .59 cents in growth for every dollar lost in revenue
Cheap plentiful natural gas is rejuvenating domestic industries and drawing factories back into the U.S. Factories that employ Americans who make money and buy shit.
Oversupplies of domestic crude have driven down prices and put billions back into the pockets of all Americans. That money BUYS shit and keeps whores like you employed.
Lol dude do you realize how much of a tool you come across as using Heritage as a source? It, Fox News, and Forbes.com are all partisan non sense. Again there is NO PROOF tax cuts for the wealthy had anything to do with the job growth under him. I'm sure other policies of his helped the job growth but NOT TAX CUTS FOR THE WEALTHY.There's no evidence the economy under Reagan did well because of supply side economics. Zero. Bush's tax cuts were huge and job growth under him was pitiful.Republicans only econonic solutions are deregulation and cutting taxes for corporations/the wealthy. Both of these methods do next to nothing to help the overall economy.
Regulations cost GDP 2% every year. Now even if you were irresponsible and stupid enough to undo ALL regulations for the sake of growth, you would only be boosting 2%. The growth of that is not nearly worth the chaos that would ensue.
Cutting taxes for corporations does jack shit for the economy in general. Stimuluating supply means dick if you don't stimuluate demand. The extra supply that is created does not meet any increase in demand. This means there is no increase in business just because a company has more to sell. Not only that, but cutting taxes only makes the government borrow more which means more debt. The proposed republican tax cuts would add 440 billion to our national debt.
The recent "experiment" failure in Kansas' economy and the pathetic job growth under Bush proves this.
See the republicans you people elect know this. They say they want to help you but in reality they only care about keeping the wealthy happy.
The reality is that the best way to stimulate economic growth is by stimulating the middle class. That is the driving force of our consumption based economy. Republicans have barely done anything for the middle class since Reagan.
Obama's stimulus created close to 3 million jobs. Why? Because it gave the middle class the biggest middle class tax cut since Reagan. It also extended unemployment benefits for the millions who lost their jobs against their will. This allowed them to spend money they wouldn't have otherwise spent because they were unemployed.
This is what you call demand-side economics.
The greatest economy in the entire history of America is the RONALD REAGAN REPUBLICAN SUPPLY SIDE ECONOMICS 80S.
You lose again.
WRONG.
The Real Reagan Economic Record Responsible and Successful Fiscal Policy
President Ronald Reagan's record includes sweeping economic reforms and deep across-the-board tax cuts, market deregulation, and sound monetary policies to contain inflation. His policies resulted in the largest peacetime economic boom in American history and nearly 35 million more jobs. As the Joint Economic Committee reported in April 2000:2
No matter how advocates of big government try to rewrite history, Ronald Reagan's record of fiscal responsibility continues to stand as the most successful economic policy of the 20th century
You lose again.
You know Google helps your political knowledge a great deal."Obama's stimulus created close to 3 million jobs"..Republicans only econonic solutions are deregulation and cutting taxes for corporations/the wealthy. Both of these methods do next to nothing to help the overall economy.
Regulations cost GDP 2% every year. Now even if you were irresponsible and stupid enough to undo ALL regulations for the sake of growth, you would only be boosting 2%. The growth of that is not nearly worth the chaos that would ensue.
Cutting taxes for corporations does jack shit for the economy in general. Stimuluating supply means dick if you don't stimuluate demand. The extra supply that is created does not meet any increase in demand. This means there is no increase in business just because a company has more to sell. Not only that, but cutting taxes only makes the government borrow more which means more debt. The proposed republican tax cuts would add 440 billion to our national debt.
The recent "experiment" failure in Kansas' economy and the pathetic job growth under Bush proves this.
See the republicans you people elect know this. They say they want to help you but in reality they only care about keeping the wealthy happy.
The reality is that the best way to stimulate economic growth is by stimulating the middle class. That is the driving force of our consumption based economy. Republicans have barely done anything for the middle class since Reagan.
Obama's stimulus created close to 3 million jobs. Why? Because it gave the middle class the biggest middle class tax cut since Reagan. It also extended unemployment benefits for the millions who lost their jobs against their will. This allowed them to spend money they wouldn't have otherwise spent because they were unemployed.
This is what you call demand-side economics.
It did?
Prove it..
Then define "job".....
