drsmith1072
Senior Member
- Jul 30, 2009
- 6,031
- 250
- 48
nodog, I gotta tell you that I'm not following your logic. I don't think you have an argument here. I asked you if you knew why DeMint was against the appointment and you responded quite rhetorically. I'm willing to be persuaded but I need some rationale information to sway me. It sounds like you have an agenda against the Republicans. If you don't know DeMint's argument then you certainly don't understand your own. What you seem to be saying is that Republicans that don't "rubber-stamp" Obama's nominees into office are aiding terrorists. That won't fly and I don't take your statements seriously; who would?
Like many in this forum, I don't believe you are willing to have a rational discussion nor do you appear to be willing to be persuaded. I think you have an agenda against the Republicans. It also sounds like your love of the Democrats is greater than your love of country.
The logic behind claiming that anyone critical of the administration is therefore providing aid and comfort to the enemy came from the right under the last administration. So it's surprising that so many on the right fail to remember a standard that they used to apply to anyone who dared being critical of w.
Demint's claim is that southers hasn't given a good enough response to his question and that is why demint has held up southers confirmation. Demint's hold up is based on the mere POSSIBLITY that southers COULD allow TSA employees to unionize not that he definitely would.