Conservative65
Gold Member
- Oct 14, 2014
- 26,127
- 2,208
- 265
- Banned
- #21
so do you think if they did that,that private industry would take it upon themselves to make sure they dont pollute?.....because i sure as hell dont....as soon as it comes between making a buck or doing something that might cost something but cuts their pollutants.....i dont trust anyone of them to chose to keep their pollutants down...
House Passes Bill that Prohibits Expert Scientific Advice to the EPA
While everyone’s attention was focused on the Senate and the Keystone XL decision on Tuesday, some pretty shocking stuff was quietly going on in the House of Representatives. The GOP-dominated House passed a bill that effectively prevents scientists who are peer-reviewed experts in their field from providing advice — directly or indirectly — to the EPA, while at the same time allowing industry representatives with financial interests in fossil fuels to have their say. Perversely, all this is being done in the name of “transparency.”
Read more: House Passes Bill that Prohibits Expert Scientific Advice to the EPA | Inhabitat - Sustainable Design Innovation, Eco Architecture, Green Building
Money talks.
My bet is that RWs will actually agree that science should have no voice in government decisions.
If you want to believe certain junk science like global warming, go ahead but that hoax shouldn't be used to make government decisions.
What they need to do is defund the EPA.
As it is, the EPA has no power. Offenders just pay their little fines and go right on polluting our water and air.
If the EPA has no power, how can they issue fines?