drsmith1072
Senior Member
- Jul 30, 2009
- 6,031
- 250
- 48
Naturally one cannot prove a negative. But disproving it would be easy. Please take 20 seconds and Google the subject and present even one or two articles from the election period where the candidates discussed their view on immigration.
Three years and Democrats failed to even consider immigration. That is the relevant fact here.
The veto proof majority was for over a year. How much time do you need to consider legislation? Is bogus climate change legislation more important than immigration,which has reached a crisis point in many areas?
If I prove you wrong will you admit it or will you do as you usualy do when i prove you wrong and attack me continuously only to cut and run from the thread without admitting wrongdoing?
however, here you go.
Before a huge crowd in San Diego last summer, Barack Obama vowed to make fixing illegal immigration a top priority as president, and Latinos nationwide responded with massive support for him on Election Day. Now, they are pressing him to keep his promise.
Obama faces pressure on immigration reform - The Boston Globe
proof that you are WRONG. AGAIN.
Can you prove immigration was never even "considered" or is that your OPINION?? Seems to me that you are rpesenting OPINION as fact. AGAIN.
The veto proof majority was NOT for over a year but thanks for the spin. When did specter switch sides?? April 28, 2010 and when did scott brown win? jan, 10 2010. (corrected typo)
That does not equal a year let alone exceed a year. Your spin loses AGAIN.
Gosh, another failure on your part. I wanted an article from the primary election period that mentioned candidates' stance on immigration. Your article appears to be after the election. Can you not tell the difference?
But even if the article is accurate, are you saying that Obama failed to follow through on yet another promise? Why did he not deal with immigration which was a top priority, as you posted, despite having overwhelming majorities in both houses of Congress?
Your dishonesty knows no end.
The article references a speech that candidate obama gave the previous summer to the crowd. You wanted proof and i gave it.
You spin you lose AGAIN.
Then you try to hedge your bets by spinning to attack obama for not following through with a campaign promise that you have previously tried to argue wasn't made. Nice contradiction.
Thanks for once again showing that you can't be hoenst and admit that you are wrong even wehn proven to be WRONG. LOL
Furthermore, the fact that you avoided how I proved your assertion that the super majority lasted over a year when it did NOT further exposes your dishonesty.
Why can't you be honest and admit that you are WRONG when proven to be WRONG??