Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Show me a single Detroit candidate who won by less than 800 votes.2 or 3 × 248. Let's use 3 since 52 of the precincts had 5 or more. So, in just one city at least 744 votes. That is enough to change any result for a city, whether local or otherwise, yet you claim no big deal. Now multiply that by all the total number of precincts in the nation. We have a problem.Since the OP didn't provide a link: Records: Too many votes in 37% of Detroit’s precincts
There were some precincts which had too many ballots, compared to the log books, and there were some which had too few.
For the most part, they were only off by two or three ballots. Nowhere near enough to affect the outcome.
From the link:
Here is a breakdown of the irregularities in Detroit’s 662 precincts:
■236 precincts in balance — equal numbers of voters counted by workers and machines
■248 precincts with too many votes and no explanation (77 were 1 over; 62 were 2 over, 37 were 3 over, 20 were 4 over, 52 were 5 or more over).
■144 precincts with too few votes and no explanation (81 were 1 under, 29 were 2 under; 19 were 3 under; 7 were 4 under; 8 were 5 or more under)
■34 precincts out of balance but with an explanation
It is not surprising so many black people decided not to vote for the party whose propaganda mills take great pains to convey just how much they hate negroes on a daily basis.Well, maybe.I love how you tards drink some piss that was never proved, and then begin to state it as a fact soon after.
But there are many ways to commit voter fraud, I know Chicago/ Cook County historically excels in that.
And one cannot help but wonder just how homogenized are black people in this country? Such as, in the 2012 election, in 59 precincts in Philadelphia Obama received 19,605 votes and Romney got 0.
Cannot assign much independent thinking in that group. In 59 Philadelphia voting divisions, Mitt Romney got zero votes
It was not the first answer that came to my mind. I proved it on this very forum a long time ago. I pointed out, every single day, for weeks, the hate the Right directed at blacks.It is not surprising so many black people decided not to vote for the party whose propaganda mills take great pains to convey just how much they hate negroes on a daily basis.Well, maybe.I love how you tards drink some piss that was never proved, and then begin to state it as a fact soon after.
But there are many ways to commit voter fraud, I know Chicago/ Cook County historically excels in that.
And one cannot help but wonder just how homogenized are black people in this country? Such as, in the 2012 election, in 59 precincts in Philadelphia Obama received 19,605 votes and Romney got 0.
Cannot assign much independent thinking in that group. In 59 Philadelphia voting divisions, Mitt Romney got zero votes
And you will take the first answer that comes to your mind, be satisfied nothing odd occurring here, and move on. Interesting.
Hmm, more votes than voters. can you say, 'sanctuary city'?
Well, maybe.I love how you tards drink some piss that was never proved, and then begin to state it as a fact soon after.
But there are many ways to commit voter fraud, I know Chicago/ Cook County historically excels in that.
And one cannot help but wonder just how homogenized are black people in this country? Such as, in the 2012 election, in 59 precincts in Philadelphia Obama received 19,605 votes and Romney got 0.
Cannot assign much independent thinking in that group. In 59 Philadelphia voting divisions, Mitt Romney got zero votes
Ever considered being an example?
Hmm, more votes than voters. can you say, 'sanctuary city'?
It was not more votes than voters. Reading comprehension fail.
Hmm, more votes than voters. can you say, 'sanctuary city'?
It was not more votes than voters. Reading comprehension fail.
r 37 percent, tabulated more ballots than the number of voters tallied by workers in the poll books
My reading comprehension says "More ballots than voters."
It was not the first answer that came to my mind. I proved it on this very forum a long time ago. I pointed out, every single day, for weeks, the hate the Right directed at blacks.It is not surprising so many black people decided not to vote for the party whose propaganda mills take great pains to convey just how much they hate negroes on a daily basis.Well, maybe.I love how you tards drink some piss that was never proved, and then begin to state it as a fact soon after.
But there are many ways to commit voter fraud, I know Chicago/ Cook County historically excels in that.
And one cannot help but wonder just how homogenized are black people in this country? Such as, in the 2012 election, in 59 precincts in Philadelphia Obama received 19,605 votes and Romney got 0.
Cannot assign much independent thinking in that group. In 59 Philadelphia voting divisions, Mitt Romney got zero votes
And you will take the first answer that comes to your mind, be satisfied nothing odd occurring here, and move on. Interesting.
Nice try.
Show me a single Detroit candidate who won by less than 800 votes.2 or 3 × 248. Let's use 3 since 52 of the precincts had 5 or more. So, in just one city at least 744 votes. That is enough to change any result for a city, whether local or otherwise, yet you claim no big deal. Now multiply that by all the total number of precincts in the nation. We have a problem.Since the OP didn't provide a link: Records: Too many votes in 37% of Detroit’s precincts
There were some precincts which had too many ballots, compared to the log books, and there were some which had too few.
For the most part, they were only off by two or three ballots. Nowhere near enough to affect the outcome.
From the link:
Here is a breakdown of the irregularities in Detroit’s 662 precincts:
■236 precincts in balance — equal numbers of voters counted by workers and machines
■248 precincts with too many votes and no explanation (77 were 1 over; 62 were 2 over, 37 were 3 over, 20 were 4 over, 52 were 5 or more over).
■144 precincts with too few votes and no explanation (81 were 1 under, 29 were 2 under; 19 were 3 under; 7 were 4 under; 8 were 5 or more under)
■34 precincts out of balance but with an explanation
And you can't extrapolate out to the entire country. Detroit made the news precisely because they are the EXCEPTION.
You are demonstrating innumeracy.
ETA: Here are the Detroit election results. You will find the candidates for every office won by many thousands, if not tens of thousands: Latest election results from Metro Detroit and Michigan
Well, maybe.I love how you tards drink some piss that was never proved, and then begin to state it as a fact soon after.
But there are many ways to commit voter fraud, I know Chicago/ Cook County historically excels in that.
And one cannot help but wonder just how homogenized are black people in this country? Such as, in the 2012 election, in 59 precincts in Philadelphia Obama received 19,605 votes and Romney got 0.
Cannot assign much independent thinking in that group. In 59 Philadelphia voting divisions, Mitt Romney got zero votes
Ever considered being an example?
Well I have certainly made merry with a number of your "pearls of wisdom"--- so I think it fine for you to try your hand at it.
(still no one can answer my suspicions)
It is not surprising so many black people decided not to vote for the party whose propaganda mills take great pains to convey just how much they hate negroes on a daily basis.Well, maybe.I love how you tards drink some piss that was never proved, and then begin to state it as a fact soon after.
But there are many ways to commit voter fraud, I know Chicago/ Cook County historically excels in that.
And one cannot help but wonder just how homogenized are black people in this country? Such as, in the 2012 election, in 59 precincts in Philadelphia Obama received 19,605 votes and Romney got 0.
Cannot assign much independent thinking in that group. In 59 Philadelphia voting divisions, Mitt Romney got zero votes
I am also certain of this. However, the pseudocon propaganda mills take great pains to coddle and nurture the haters, and thus stain the entire Republican party.I am certain the vast majority of whites in America do not hate anyone!
I believe that was stated back four weeks ago. it's why they didn't want to do the recounts.Since the OP didn't provide a link: Records: Too many votes in 37% of Detroit’s precincts
There were some precincts which had too many ballots, compared to the log books, and there were some which had too few.
For the most part, they were only off by two or three ballots. Nowhere near enough to affect the outcome.
From the link:
Here is a breakdown of the irregularities in Detroit’s 662 precincts:
■236 precincts in balance — equal numbers of voters counted by workers and machines
■248 precincts with too many votes and no explanation (77 were 1 over; 62 were 2 over, 37 were 3 over, 20 were 4 over, 52 were 5 or more over).
■144 precincts with too few votes and no explanation (81 were 1 under, 29 were 2 under; 19 were 3 under; 7 were 4 under; 8 were 5 or more under)
■34 precincts out of balance but with an explanation
No, but you are. And all of your fellow travelers.It is not surprising so many black people decided not to vote for the party whose propaganda mills take great pains to convey just how much they hate negroes on a daily basis.Well, maybe.I love how you tards drink some piss that was never proved, and then begin to state it as a fact soon after.
But there are many ways to commit voter fraud, I know Chicago/ Cook County historically excels in that.
And one cannot help but wonder just how homogenized are black people in this country? Such as, in the 2012 election, in 59 precincts in Philadelphia Obama received 19,605 votes and Romney got 0.
Cannot assign much independent thinking in that group. In 59 Philadelphia voting divisions, Mitt Romney got zero votes
Romney was a "Hater"? Really?
naw, that only happens in California.Poll taxes, only registered (as republican) voters, and republican candidates only allowed on the ballots. There's ya fix.
No, it is why they couldn't do the recounts.I believe that was stated back four weeks ago. it's why they didn't want to do the recounts.Since the OP didn't provide a link: Records: Too many votes in 37% of Detroit’s precincts
There were some precincts which had too many ballots, compared to the log books, and there were some which had too few.
For the most part, they were only off by two or three ballots. Nowhere near enough to affect the outcome.
From the link:
Here is a breakdown of the irregularities in Detroit’s 662 precincts:
■236 precincts in balance — equal numbers of voters counted by workers and machines
■248 precincts with too many votes and no explanation (77 were 1 over; 62 were 2 over, 37 were 3 over, 20 were 4 over, 52 were 5 or more over).
■144 precincts with too few votes and no explanation (81 were 1 under, 29 were 2 under; 19 were 3 under; 7 were 4 under; 8 were 5 or more under)
■34 precincts out of balance but with an explanation
yeah cause we didn't agree to keep in inner cities for their entire lives.No, but you are. And all of your fellow travelers.It is not surprising so many black people decided not to vote for the party whose propaganda mills take great pains to convey just how much they hate negroes on a daily basis.Well, maybe.I love how you tards drink some piss that was never proved, and then begin to state it as a fact soon after.
But there are many ways to commit voter fraud, I know Chicago/ Cook County historically excels in that.
And one cannot help but wonder just how homogenized are black people in this country? Such as, in the 2012 election, in 59 precincts in Philadelphia Obama received 19,605 votes and Romney got 0.
Cannot assign much independent thinking in that group. In 59 Philadelphia voting divisions, Mitt Romney got zero votes
Romney was a "Hater"? Really?
It is YOU and your kind who have run off minority voters.
