Records: Too many votes in 37% of Detroit’s precincts

Cellblock2429

Diamond Member
Gold Supporting Member
Jul 22, 2016
34,263
14,640
1,600
New York
Detailed reports from the office of Wayne County Clerk Cathy Garrett show optical scanners at 248 of the city’s 662 precincts, or 37 percent, tabulated more ballots than the number of voters tallied by workers in the poll books. Voting irregularities in Detroit have spurred plans for an audit by Michigan Secretary of State Ruth Johnson’s office, Elections Director Chris Thomas said Monday.
 
We need voter ID and Baghdad purple finger elections -- to stop Russian hacks, or something
 
Detailed reports from the office of Wayne County Clerk Cathy Garrett show optical scanners at 248 of the city’s 662 precincts, or 37 percent, tabulated more ballots than the number of voters tallied by workers in the poll books. Voting irregularities in Detroit have spurred plans for an audit by Michigan Secretary of State Ruth Johnson’s office, Elections Director Chris Thomas said Monday.

Commies cheat, it's genetic
 
Since the OP didn't provide a link: Records: Too many votes in 37% of Detroit’s precincts

There were some precincts which had too many ballots, compared to the log books, and there were some which had too few.

For the most part, they were only off by two or three ballots. Nowhere near enough to affect the outcome.

From the link:

Here is a breakdown of the irregularities in Detroit’s 662 precincts:

■236 precincts in balance — equal numbers of voters counted by workers and machines

■248 precincts with too many votes and no explanation (77 were 1 over; 62 were 2 over, 37 were 3 over, 20 were 4 over, 52 were 5 or more over).

■144 precincts with too few votes and no explanation (81 were 1 under, 29 were 2 under; 19 were 3 under; 7 were 4 under; 8 were 5 or more under)

■34 precincts out of balance but with an explanation
 
Since the OP didn't provide a link: Records: Too many votes in 37% of Detroit’s precincts

There were some precincts which had too many ballots, compared to the log books, and there were some which had too few.

For the most part, they were only off by two or three ballots. Nowhere near enough to affect the outcome.

From the link:

Here is a breakdown of the irregularities in Detroit’s 662 precincts:

■236 precincts in balance — equal numbers of voters counted by workers and machines

■248 precincts with too many votes and no explanation (77 were 1 over; 62 were 2 over, 37 were 3 over, 20 were 4 over, 52 were 5 or more over).

■144 precincts with too few votes and no explanation (81 were 1 under, 29 were 2 under; 19 were 3 under; 7 were 4 under; 8 were 5 or more under)

■34 precincts out of balance but with an explanation
Looks like we need to throw out all the votes in Michigan

Can't be too safe
 
Poll taxes, only registered (as republican) voters, and republican candidates only allowed on the ballots. There's ya fix.
 
hillary-clinton-crazy.jpg
 
Since the OP didn't provide a link: Records: Too many votes in 37% of Detroit’s precincts

There were some precincts which had too many ballots, compared to the log books, and there were some which had too few.

For the most part, they were only off by two or three ballots. Nowhere near enough to affect the outcome.

From the link:

Here is a breakdown of the irregularities in Detroit’s 662 precincts:

■236 precincts in balance — equal numbers of voters counted by workers and machines

■248 precincts with too many votes and no explanation (77 were 1 over; 62 were 2 over, 37 were 3 over, 20 were 4 over, 52 were 5 or more over).

■144 precincts with too few votes and no explanation (81 were 1 under, 29 were 2 under; 19 were 3 under; 7 were 4 under; 8 were 5 or more under)

■34 precincts out of balance but with an explanation
Looks like we need to throw out all the votes in Michigan

Can't be too safe
As long as we can throw out all the votes in California due to the illegals voting, I can agree with that.
 
Since the OP didn't provide a link: Records: Too many votes in 37% of Detroit’s precincts

There were some precincts which had too many ballots, compared to the log books, and there were some which had too few.

For the most part, they were only off by two or three ballots. Nowhere near enough to affect the outcome.

From the link:

Here is a breakdown of the irregularities in Detroit’s 662 precincts:

■236 precincts in balance — equal numbers of voters counted by workers and machines

■248 precincts with too many votes and no explanation (77 were 1 over; 62 were 2 over, 37 were 3 over, 20 were 4 over, 52 were 5 or more over).

■144 precincts with too few votes and no explanation (81 were 1 under, 29 were 2 under; 19 were 3 under; 7 were 4 under; 8 were 5 or more under)

■34 precincts out of balance but with an explanation
Looks like we need to throw out all the votes in Michigan

Can't be too safe
As long as we can throw out all the votes in California due to the illegals voting, I can agree with that.
I love how you tards drink some piss that was never proved, and then begin to state it as a fact soon after.
 
Since the OP didn't provide a link: Records: Too many votes in 37% of Detroit’s precincts

There were some precincts which had too many ballots, compared to the log books, and there were some which had too few.

For the most part, they were only off by two or three ballots. Nowhere near enough to affect the outcome.

From the link:

Here is a breakdown of the irregularities in Detroit’s 662 precincts:

■236 precincts in balance — equal numbers of voters counted by workers and machines

■248 precincts with too many votes and no explanation (77 were 1 over; 62 were 2 over, 37 were 3 over, 20 were 4 over, 52 were 5 or more over).

■144 precincts with too few votes and no explanation (81 were 1 under, 29 were 2 under; 19 were 3 under; 7 were 4 under; 8 were 5 or more under)

■34 precincts out of balance but with an explanation
Looks like we need to throw out all the votes in Michigan

Can't be too safe
As long as we can throw out all the votes in California due to the illegals voting, I can agree with that.
And after that Clinton may forget her "winning the popular vote"
 
So I wonder who benefits from an entire society being programmed/indoctrinated into discounting/hating their own society, economic system, political system, media, and each other.
 
Poll taxes, only registered (as republican) voters, and republican candidates only allowed on the ballots. There's ya fix.


No we could have an IQ test, we still win that.
You guys can do your fake history and fake math.....
 
I love how you tards drink some piss that was never proved, and then begin to state it as a fact soon after.
Well, maybe.

But there are many ways to commit voter fraud, I know Chicago/ Cook County historically excels in that.

And one cannot help but wonder just how homogenized are black people in this country? Such as, in the 2012 election, in 59 precincts in Philadelphia Obama received 19,605 votes and Romney got 0.
Cannot assign much independent thinking in that group. In 59 Philadelphia voting divisions, Mitt Romney got zero votes
 
I love how you tards drink some piss that was never proved, and then begin to state it as a fact soon after.
Well, maybe.

But there are many ways to commit voter fraud, I know Chicago/ Cook County historically excels in that.

And one cannot help but wonder just how homogenized are black people in this country? Such as, in the 2012 election, in 59 precincts in Philadelphia Obama received 19,605 votes and Romney got 0.
Cannot assign much independent thinking in that group. In 59 Philadelphia voting divisions, Mitt Romney got zero votes
It is not surprising so many black people decided not to vote for the party whose propaganda mills take great pains to convey just how much they hate negroes on a daily basis.
 
Detailed reports from the office of Wayne County Clerk Cathy Garrett show optical scanners at 248 of the city’s 662 precincts, or 37 percent, tabulated more ballots than the number of voters tallied by workers in the poll books. Voting irregularities in Detroit have spurred plans for an audit by Michigan Secretary of State Ruth Johnson’s office, Elections Director Chris Thomas said Monday.

Link?

Or did the voices in your head tell you that?
 
2 or 3 × 248. Let's use 3 since 52 of the precincts had 5 or more. So, in just one city at least 744 votes. That is enough to change any result for a city, whether local or otherwise, yet you claim no big deal. Now multiply that by all the total number of precincts in the nation. We have a problem.
Since the OP didn't provide a link: Records: Too many votes in 37% of Detroit’s precincts

There were some precincts which had too many ballots, compared to the log books, and there were some which had too few.

For the most part, they were only off by two or three ballots. Nowhere near enough to affect the outcome.

From the link:

Here is a breakdown of the irregularities in Detroit’s 662 precincts:

■236 precincts in balance — equal numbers of voters counted by workers and machines

■248 precincts with too many votes and no explanation (77 were 1 over; 62 were 2 over, 37 were 3 over, 20 were 4 over, 52 were 5 or more over).

■144 precincts with too few votes and no explanation (81 were 1 under, 29 were 2 under; 19 were 3 under; 7 were 4 under; 8 were 5 or more under)

■34 precincts out of balance but with an explanation
 

Forum List

Back
Top